GDT: Game 50: Phoenix Coyotes @ Calgary Flames 1/22/14| 7:30PM

JTPoni23

Registered User
Dec 26, 2012
787
46
Barrie, Ontario
Doesn't really help that we literally have the worst offence in the league the past 8 games. Obviously Smith is playing average this season overall. But even if he played in his 2012 form these past 8 games, would it really make a difference with how bad our defence and offence compared to back then is?
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Smith didn't lose the game for us. It's just we wouldn't have been any worse off with any of the 800kay/yr goalies in the league tonight. Or any night this season, so far. It's not that he's the worst goalie in the world and an absolute travesty on ice, it's just that his pay is about five times higher than his production. Luis ridiculously bloated would be much better used plugging other holes. And there are plenty of other holes.

Best typo ever. My autocorrect is disturbing. Luis? Haha.
 

zz

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
6,170
353
Smith didn't lose the game for us. It's just we wouldn't have been any worse off with any of the 800kay/yr goalies in the league tonight. Or any night this season, so far. It's not that he's the worst goalie in the world and an absolute travesty on ice, it's just that his pay is about five times higher than his production. Luis ridiculously bloated would be much better used plugging other holes. And there are plenty of other holes.

Exactly. I would have no problem with Smith at $ 3M / yr.
 

zz

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
6,170
353
You mean the one where Stajan hit one off the ladies tee and because we are lacking physical defencemen Smith was screened and didn't even see the shot? Or the one where the worst 2 on 1 defence in the history of the league happened?

Smith could see the puck all the way on all 3 goals. Look closely at the replay. That 'screen' on the third goal was 6 feet away from him. No ugly goal, no unlucky bounce, no unfortunate rebound. Can most goalies stop all 3? Of course not. Should an elite goalie be expected to save 1 or 2 out of those 3? Yes. Absolutely.

He made 5 big saves in a row to keep it a one goal game in the second, and then our defensive coverage came through again and gave Stajan all the time in the world to tee it up.

How many times did Karri Rämö save the Flames' bacon? We could have switched goalies and would not have fared worse. Maybe better, who knows, but definitely not worse. Karri Ramo makes $ 2.8M / yr. That's about how much Mike Smith is worth. I would have no problem with him being our starter at that price. The guy's just an average NHL goalie paid like a HOFer.
 
Last edited:

JTPoni23

Registered User
Dec 26, 2012
787
46
Barrie, Ontario
Smith could see the puck all the way on all 3 goals. Look closely at the replay. That 'screen' on the third goal was 6 feet away from him. No ugly goal, no unlucky bounce, no unfortunate rebound. Can most goalies stop all 3? Of course not. Should an elite goalie be expected to save 1 or 2 out of those 3? Yes. Absolutely.



How many times did Karri Rämö save the Flames' bacon? We could have switched goalies and would not have fared worse. Maybe better, who knows, but definitely not worse. Karri Ramo makes $ 2.8M / yr. That's about how much Mike Smith is worth. I would have no problem with him being our started at that price. The guy's just an average NHL goalie paid like a HOFer.

I'm not arguing the contract bit. Everyone knows he's overpaid. But what "elite" goalie in the league today plays behind a combination of terrible offense and defense like ours? The Kings don't score many goals, but their defensive structure is superb and I rarely see them give up as many quality chances as we do. The Hawks have a terrible defensive structure, but they score their way out of a defensive blackhole.

We have neither situation here.

The Buffalo Sabres are currently scoring at a higher pace than we are the past couple games. Couple that with a defence core that is praised league wide but in reality is terrible in it's own zone, and you get the embarrassing performances we've seen lately. At least in the first part of the season our offense masked our defence.
 

Etch

Relegate the Oilers
Jun 1, 2011
1,051
65
Moncton, NB
I'm not arguing the contract bit. Everyone knows he's overpaid. But what "elite" goalie in the league today plays behind a combination of terrible offense and defense like ours? The Kings don't score many goals, but their defensive structure is superb and I rarely see them give up as many quality chances as we do. The Hawks have a terrible defensive structure, but they score their way out of a defensive blackhole.

We have neither situation here.

The Buffalo Sabres are currently scoring at a higher pace than we are the past couple games. Couple that with a defence core that is praised league wide but in reality is terrible in it's own zone, and you get the embarrassing performances we've seen lately. At least in the first part of the season our offense masked our defence.

I'll agree some games we've been soft on D, but I still think an above average goaltender would give a lot more points in the standings right now. I'd argue the Leafs didn't get more than 1-2 quality scoring chance and still threw 4 past Smith. There have been games where a 2 on 1 against was our biggest defensive lapse.
If it's even got a hint of seeming like a scoring chance Smith just seems to let er in sometimes :dunno:

Last night he did make some decent saves for sure. I'm not happy with the goals that he let in. Overall he's definitely had much worse games. Ramo still significantly outplayed him in the end.
 

Grimes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 5, 2012
8,680
5,202
Tippet's Doghouse
cleanhits.substack.com
Yotes are going to have to play above .500 hockey to make the playoffs. If they win half the remaining games they will end the season at 87 points. Not enough. Do or die time. Also, because of the large break in Feb aren't they currently in the time frame which they usually go on a tear? Hopefully if they miss the playoffs this will be seen more as a transitional year.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
Smith could see the puck all the way on all 3 goals. Look closely at the replay. That 'screen' on the third goal was 6 feet away from him. No ugly goal, no unlucky bounce, no unfortunate rebound. Can most goalies stop all 3? Of course not. Should an elite goalie be expected to save 1 or 2 out of those 3? Yes. Absolutely.



How many times did Karri Rämö save the Flames' bacon? We could have switched goalies and would not have fared worse. Maybe better, who knows, but definitely not worse. Karri Ramo makes $ 2.8M / yr. That's about how much Mike Smith is worth. I would have no problem with him being our starter at that price. The guy's just an average NHL goalie paid like a HOFer.

Their goalie outplayed our goalie, end of story. I am not saying this loss is Smith's fault. This is really a simple analysis, same for 90% of our games, Smith has to be the better goalie period.
 

BUX7PHX

Registered User
Jul 7, 2011
5,581
1,350
I don't think Smith is bad. His numbers look pretty good and are not far from 11-12 Smith numbers. I think the line shuffling needs to stop. And I do not know what happened to this team but sometimes they look like a bunch players lost and not sure what to do. While the other team skates around them.

I think Yandle should not join the rush as much. He makes great plays from the point and he is good at bringing the puck in but sometimes it seems like he gets cocky.

This.

When Yandle is reigned in, he has fewer points, but does anyone notice that the TEAM succeeds?

2009-10: Yandle - 41 points, Team - 107 points; nearly took out Detroit in 1st round, and still, IMHO, the best Coyotes team that we have had, hands-down (put Smith circa 2011-12 season in net and we win the Cup)
2010-11: Yandle - 59 points, Team - 99 points; embarassed by Detroit in 1st round, although there were a lot of distractions during that point in the season (although I don't think anyone could say that we were true "contenders" that year)
2011-12: Yandle - 43 points, Team - 97 points; first Division title in history and run to WCF
2012-13: Yandle - 30 points, Team - 51 points; Yandle leads team in points and we miss the playoffs
2013-14: Yandle - 35 points, Team - 55 points; clinging to 9th side and still trying to move up in standings

I understand it is foolish for me to say that when Yandle has a good year, we fail. But at the same time, these results are also hard to ignore. And that's why I've advocated getting a return on Yandle - he is offense, offense, offense, and eventually that path leads to trouble (whether him making defensive gaffes or creating scenarios where our offensive play becomes unbalanced). Get me a more solid defensive D-man who can put up about 25-30 points in a season and a top 6 forward for him. I truly believe that we become much more dangerous that way.
 

BUX7PHX

Registered User
Jul 7, 2011
5,581
1,350
Our PP would be garbage without Yandle. Until somebody comes up with a replacement puck mover his positives outweigh the negatives. And no, not even OEL can do it. The only guy I've seen close to doing it as well and as consistently as Yands is Ribs.

Of course, Yandle has been everything about our PP, and Newell Brown (who coached a Canuck PP to a 1st and 5th PP% in 2010-11 and 2011-12) has had nothing to do with it.

Look at where Vancouver is this year in PP% (similar players playing) without him.
 

zz

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
6,170
353
Their goalie outplayed our goalie, end of story. I am not saying this loss is Smith's fault. This is really a simple analysis, same for 90% of our games, Smith has to be the better goalie period.

That sums it up.

I thought Yandle and Stone were a lot worse than Smith last night.

That's beside the point. Yandle also had many games this season where he was again 'super Yandle'. You can argue whether he's worth the gamble, but as far as offensive d-men go, there is no longer any doubt the guy's elite. ANd if we change our mind regarding Yandle, I am 100% positive we could trade the guy without taking salary back.

Stone's contract is $ 1M, and he's still got upside. Can easily be traded as well.

Smith? Not so much. We're stuck.
 

CC96

Serious Offender
Nov 6, 2012
18,098
1,029
Mesa, Arizona
That's beside the point. Yandle also had many games this season where he was again 'super Yandle'. You can argue whether he's worth the gamble, but as far as offensive d-men go, there is no longer any doubt the guy's elite. ANd if we change our mind regarding Yandle, I am 100% positive we could trade the guy without taking salary back.

Stone's contract is $ 1M, and he's still got upside. Can easily be traded as well.

Smith? Not so much. We're stuck.

I hold Yandle accountable the same way I hold Smith. Smith's also had games where he's played outstanding this season, but that does not give him a free pass to play poorly in other games.

Yandle is also one of the highest paid players on the team, he shouldn't get a free pass for not playing well over a stretch of games, because he scored against the Oilers. I don't mind if he has a bad pinch here or a turnover there, but he's looked like a trainwreck defensively over the last 6 or 7 games. I'm sure he'll snap out of it soon enough, but he's got to step it up, along with a number of players right now.
 

cobra427

Registered User
May 6, 2012
9,383
3,421
I hold Yandle accountable the same way I hold Smith. Smith's also had games where he's played outstanding this season, but that does not give him a free pass to play poorly in other games.

Yandle is also one of the highest paid players on the team, he shouldn't get a free pass for not playing well over a stretch of games, because he scored against the Oilers. I don't mind if he has a bad pinch here or a turnover there, but he's looked like a trainwreck defensively over the last 6 or 7 games. I'm sure he'll snap out of it soon enough, but he's got to step it up, along with a number of players right now.

I don't think he should get a free pass either. I think with the team struggles, key D being out, and the Olympic snub, Keith has maybe been trying to do too much lately. Yandle is not the best D man, we all know that, and has had some more noticeable lapses lately. I do think the way I would measure Yandle as a player is this: How many plays does he make that wind up in the back of the opponents net. This would be goals and primary assists. Versus, how many mistakes does he make that wind up in our net. I think he makes way more plays that lead to points then he gives up.

Last nights mistake was not good but not near as bad as Stone misplaying the 2 on 1 after it. Dmo or Z would not have misplayed a 2 on 1. I think he has been our best all around player this year. If Yandle is out, how would we ever score more then a goal a game? Think about that for a minute...
 

GiveAFlyingPuck

Boring hockey aficionado
Jun 19, 2011
10,349
7,555
NW Valley of the Sun
Five for Howling posted this on facebook:

Coyotes through 50 games: (10/11): 57 points (11/12): 52 points (13/14): 55 points. Team needs to play better but don't give up on 'em yet.


Maybe there is still hope. Going to come down to injuries, I think.
 

Grimes

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 5, 2012
8,680
5,202
Tippet's Doghouse
cleanhits.substack.com
Five for Howling posted this on facebook:

Coyotes through 50 games: (10/11): 57 points (11/12): 52 points (13/14): 55 points. Team needs to play better but don't give up on 'em yet.


Maybe there is still hope. Going to come down to injuries, I think.

This is reassuring. They are still going to have to play lights out though.
 

KG

Registered User
Sep 23, 2010
4,873
744
They usually go streaking in February. Remember WCF season. 11 straight
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad