GDT: Game 42: Columbus vs. New York Rangers | 1/16 7PM EST

[aRussian]

Good pass, good release.
Won't mean anything if we don't get some pressure to get goals outside of rare plays like that

 

[Samkow]

Nice.

Lundqvist fail.

And holy **** was that a great pass by RyJO.

 

[Johansen2Foligno]

Trade Hartnell while his stock is high. Blow up the team. Put Richards in the press box.

Did I miss anything?

 

[MoeBartoli]

43!!!! And Bob is doing it the defensive and offensive end.

 

[Derby]

Trade Hartnell while his stock is high. Blow up the team. Put Richards in the press box.

Did I miss anything?

I don't think you really know us. There is a large and loyal sunshine contingent. You're not really accurate. Great first impression you make, lol.

 

[major major]

Did Wennberg or Morin hit the post there?

 

[aRussian]

Wennberg at game 42 looks MUCH better than Wennberg in games ~1-35

 

[hockey17jp]

Did Wennberg or Morin hit the post there?

Don't know about post but Wennberg was awfully close.

 

[MFRONE]

Anderson's game is perfect for this team

 

[major major]

Don't know about post but Wennberg was awfully close.

Yep Wennberg hit the post. I saw it on the replay on the MSG feed.

 

[Zarathustra]

Anderson's game is perfect for this team

Yeah, I've liked Anderson since the pre-season. I'm surprised he didn't get called up sooner.

 

[MFRONE]

Replay clearly shows Bob having his foot kicked out from under him by the Rangers player. No idea how that wasn't a penalty

 

[MFRONE]

Of course

 

[MFRONE]

High stick and the Rangers were offsides

 

[Samkow]

Think that'll be a goal.

 

[EspenK]

Off of Hartnell.

 

[Samkow]

High stick and the Rangers were offsides

Looks like the Ranger didn't touch it. They were offsides, but that's not reviewable unfortunately.

 

[MoeBartoli]

High stick and the Rangers were offsides

I think it'll be a goal but it should've been called back before it got to that point

 

[EspenK]

They never called high stick did they? Even if it was it wasn't called that's not reviewable is it?

 

[aRussian]

Either/or.
1:26 to go.

 

[MFRONE]

Jackets have a legitimate complaint tonight. Rangers got away with breaking the rules all 3rd period, making a comeback very difficult

 

[Samkow]

They never called high stick did they? Even if it was it wasn't called that's not reviewable is it?

It's reviewable, but the Nash high stick (if he even touched it) is negated by it touching Bob/Hartnell.

 

[Zarathustra]

Even if it wasn't a high-stick, he hit Bob too in the crease, so should have been incidental contact either way, but I didn't think it would have been called back.

 

[EspenK]

Dodged a break there.

 

[Samkow]

Haha, an incorrect call in the Jackets favor (not that they weren't offsides in the first place)