GDT: Game 34: Columbus vs. Boston | 12/27 7PM EST

[punk_o_holic]

B's announcer still saying it won't count. Now pissed off.

 

[Cowumbus]

Just out working them completely

 

[JacketFanInFL]

Mattural Ice!!!!

 

[nhldiedinthe90s*]

Jack Edwards is going crazy saying this goal shouldnt' count.

I'm pretty sure he's right.

 

[The Jones Zone]

Big goal to take back momentum

 

[punk_o_holic]

Jack Edwards is going crazy saying this goal shouldnt' count.

I'm pretty sure he's right.

He is and that goal is is huge.

 

[Halfboard]

Rimer just informed us we're playing the Pens????!!!!!..............

 

[Socks]

Jack Edwards is going crazy saying this goal shouldnt' count.

I'm pretty sure he's right.

Yeah I think so too. But it's only cheating if you get caught.

 

[blahblah]

Hey there is our forecheck. Given up a couple of odd-mans, but some of our best 5 on 5 play all year.

 

[Cowumbus]

Jack Edwards is going crazy saying this goal shouldnt' count.

I'm pretty sure he's right.

Why should it not count I missed it

Edit: if you're saying bc it hit the net it's not reviewable and jack Edwards would not be mad if it was the bruins who scored a min later

 

[DJA]

**** Jack Edwards. even B's fans are telling him to S T F U

 

[The Jones Zone]

Did they change the rule?

Is the netting now reviewable....if so Toronto screwed up, I don't recall them changing the rule since the Detroit goal fiasco

 

[EspenK]

Rimer just informed us we're playing the Pens????!!!!!..............

At least the uni colors are the same - gotta give him that. Not like he said the Sharks.

 

[punk_o_holic]

Why should it not count I missed it

A couple of minutes earlier,a Bruins shot got deflected into the net. Play should have been dead but play happened for a couple of minutes. Then the goal. To his defense, he was saying all this play is for nothing when it went out. Not once they scored. He was also saying the NHL said they would look at any play like this because of what happened last season.

**** Jack Edwards. even B's fans are telling him to S T F U

As mentioned in my above post, he was saying this the minute it hit the net. He didn't start crying once they scored. During the play, he kept on saying(both shots by Boston and Columbus) that if it goes it, it won't count.

Also, I'm pretty sure a lot of us were outraged when it happened last year when it happened in the Wings game which gave the Wings 2 points and not 0.

 

[EspenK]

Last 5 minutes of 2nd was some of the most entertaining hockey the Jackets have played all year.

And boy has Boston really regressed from last year.

 

[Socks]

I kinda kinda hope we go on to score a couple more and get the game firmly in hand and then in the last minute or so of the game Prout dummies Lucic again out of the blue just to troll him. I know, I know, bad hockey etiquette, but it would make for an amusing end to the game given he's got to be feeling good about himself right now.

But really I just want the two points and **** Lucic.

 

[DJA]

Should the puck strike the spectator netting at the ends and the corners of the arena, play shall be stopped and the ensuing face-off shall be determined as if the puck went outside the playing area. However, if the puck striking the spectator netting goes unnoticed by the on-ice officials, play shall continue as normal and resulting play with the puck shall be deemed a legitimate play. Players must not stop playing the game until they hear the whistle to do so.

Rule 85.1

 

[CBJx614]

Am I the only one who feels Prout didn't necessarily lose that fight? He did a really good job of holding Lucic off after his rapid fire punch method didn't work and completely regained his composure and held off Lucic and completely controlled him, yeah he took some punches and was the first to fall but that doesn't mean he lost

 

[Socks]

Skille hurt too? INJURIES FOR EVERYBODY!

 

[nhldiedinthe90s*]

Did they change the rule?

Is the netting now reviewable....if so Toronto screwed up, I don't recall them changing the rule since the Detroit goal fiasco

Yes Jack was saying the rule change happened over the summer.

He's saying the NHL told the broadcasters in detail at a meeting that in this exact situation the goal would not count, the clock would be turned back to when the puck went out of play, and penalties would count.

He has not sourced any literature verifying this.

 

[DJA]

Yes Jack was saying the rule change happened over the summer.

He's saying the NHL told the broadcasters in detail at a meeting that in this exact situation the goal would not count, the clock would be turned back to when the puck went out of play, and penalties would count.

He has not sourced any literature verifying this.

he's full of ****

 

[The Jones Zone]

We need our first hat trick in a long time

get Hartnell the puck

 

[DJA]

"Morin fights off the check from Skille"

 

[nhldiedinthe90s*]

he's full of ****

The color guy is saying he was at the meeting and remembers the exact slideshow the NHL put together detailing this.

I really doubt they'd both lie about this on national TV. Especially when they had made their opinion clear well before the Jackets scored.

I don't know what to think but it's definitely a huge goal in the hockey game.

 

[The Jones Zone]

Morin!