Post-Game Talk: GAME #34 - Canucks 1 @ Ducks 2 OT

[y2kcanucks]

I can't believe what I'm reading. So I can't say that I'm absolutely sure about something without backing it up with money or something else? Can't I just say my own opinion and be pretty sure about it?

Yeah, I think I'm done with this nonsense. Some of you really need to get a grip.

No, apparently we aren't allowed to have our own opinions otherwise a bunch of people will get mad. Such a shame really. The Sedin's have a poor game and haven't looked that great at all this season outside of games against Edmonton, and yet when someone brings it up people get all defensive. Such a shame.

 

[Taelin]

No, apparently we aren't allowed to have our own opinions otherwise a bunch of people will get mad. Such a shame really. The Sedin's have a poor game and haven't looked that great at all this season outside of games against Edmonton, and yet when someone brings it up people get all defensive. Such a shame.

To be fair, everyone looks great against Edmonton, especially if you play them 6 times a year.

 

[Scurr]

I can't believe what I'm reading. So I can't say that I'm absolutely sure about something without backing it up with money or something else? Can't I just say my own opinion and be pretty sure about it?

Yeah, I think I'm done with this nonsense. Some of you really need to get a grip.

It seems you're the one taking it far too seriously.

No, apparently we aren't allowed to have our own opinions otherwise a bunch of people will get mad. Such a shame really. The Sedin's have a poor game and haven't looked that great at all this season outside of games against Edmonton, and yet when someone brings it up people get all defensive. Such a shame.

Is this your comeback to actual stats that disprove your half baked theory?

 

[Taelin]

No, apparently we aren't allowed to have our own opinions otherwise a bunch of people will get mad. Such a shame really. The Sedin's have a poor game and haven't looked that great at all this season outside of games against Edmonton, and yet when someone brings it up people get all defensive. Such a shame.

Henrik Sedin this season:

EDM: .67PPG
CGY: 1.5PPG
WSH: 1.5PPG
COL: 1 PPG
ARZ: 1 PPG

Daniel Sedin this season:

EDM: 0.75PPG
CGY: 1PPG
WSH: 2PPG
COL: 1.5PPG
ARZ: 1PPG

 

[Zaddy91]

Points are still points, just because they lit up the Sharks doesn't make them less valuable points.

They did well in 2012 and 2013 when our bot 9 was shambles, i still question their effectiveness going into these playoffs.

and considering them agqinst boston, i dont see a difference when we play a nashville or stl in 2014

 

[Barney Gumble]

Yeah, I think I'm done with this nonsense.

You referring to the Sedin "unique points" argument?

 

[arsmaster*]

I can't believe what I'm reading. So I can't say that I'm absolutely sure about something without backing it up with money or something else? Can't I just say my own opinion and be pretty sure about it?

Yeah, I think I'm done with this nonsense. Some of you really need to get a grip.

No. The people who need to get a grip are the ones who believe that a player who is scoring at a 0.88ppg rate through 33 games is going to score at a 0.48ppg for the rest of the season. That is irrational and there is nothing to back it up.

I think betting on it, is just to get people to stand up for their wild claims.

 

[MS]

No. The people who need to get a grip are the ones who believe that a player who is scoring at a 0.88ppg rate through 33 games is going to score at a 0.48ppg for the rest of the season. That is irrational and there is nothing to back it up.

I think betting on it, is just to get people to stand up for their wild claims.

Exactly.

If the Sedins fall off (which may happen), they'll end up in the 60-65 point range, barring injury. Not 50 points. It's a ridiculous notion.

 

[vadim sharifijanov]

whoa what the hell happened in this thread?

 

[Peen]

whoa what the hell happened in this thread?

Shinkaruk is a #1 winger, sedins are 40 point players

 

[Barney Gumble]

whoa what the hell happened in this thread?

 

[Rotting Corpse*]

No. The people who need to get a grip are the ones who believe that a player who is scoring at a 0.88ppg rate through 33 games is going to score at a 0.48ppg for the rest of the season. That is irrational and there is nothing to back it up.

I think betting on it, is just to get people to stand up for their wild claims.

Pretty much.

If you can't defend what you say then don't bother saying it. Simple.

 

[carolinacanuck]

Pretty much.

If you can't defend what you say then don't bother saying it. Simple.

dude, you sound like you've spent time in the clink.

not that there's anything wrong with that, everyone makes mistakes lol

 

[Rotting Corpse*]

whoa what the hell happened in this thread?

Claude lemieux cheapshot. Turtled when challenged.

 

[Brock Boeser]

Why bother arguing with someone though when they wanted the twins gone back in 09'. Really don't know how someone could dislike them so much.

 

[The Stig]

Next pregame is up