A few bits, in no particular order:
A lot of fans and media types underestimated Patrice Bergeron's value to the Boston Bruins for a long time. It wasn't until he added significant scoring production that he received acclaim.
Those who followed Patrice closely understood how dominant he was in the faceoff circle and beyond. I'm not certain we understood how central to Boston's success he was.
Not a stats person but will look for a piece published upon his retirement. The numbers relative to Bergeron's impact on the Bruins' defensive game are eye popping, never mind offense.
So, there's that. Krejci too.
That things went swimmingly through the regular season last year can be attributed to a] far greater depth; b] greater talent; c] the novelty of Montgomery's "system" -- predicated on getting to the puck in the defensive zone and a full throttle rush -- had opponents flat-footed for a time.
The Panthers solved this riddle in the first round with a relentless forecheck and physical play, thus handing the rest of the NHL a cheat sheet on how to beat the Bruins, to paraphrase Nick Colageo.
This season, the Bruins are no longer a high-octane, smooth-running machine with reliable scoring depth.
It's thin gruel at best, and that's not Montgomery's fault.
As Brian Sutter would say, Sunny Jim doesn't have the horses.
The D corps is a a mess and you have to ask why. Carlo is having a career season. Forbort is more valuable than those eager to jettison him imagine or admit.
Matt Gryzlick (oft injured), Hampus Lindholm (clearly frustrated and exhausted), and Charlie McAvoy (gun shy and beat up) have vastly underperformed.
Now, again, why?
To me, on defense, this is about an inability to execute a system that opponents are wise to and can, evidently, easily disrupt.
Relative to Boston's defense, the Bruins are easily knocked off the puck and offer little physical resistance, never mind initiative (as with the rest of their lineup, save Frederic, Lauko and Steen, which tells you everything you need to know about their team toughness). D corps cannot break out cleanly with a pass or carrying the puck; they're soft as puppy poop, do not check, cannot clear their crease, and therefore, surprise surprise, wind up hemmed in their own zone not for seconds, but minutes.
This is the worst defensive Bruins team I've seen in a long time.
On paper, this should be a top D corps. Whatever is ailing Gryz, Lindholm and Charlie can be corrected, beginning with bringing in size and intimidation.
Nonetheless it seems to me the main reason for the clusterf*ck is a system that is not working, hasn't for a long time, and must be redrawn or discarded.
I realize it's unfair and probably untrue, but I don't believe Jim Montgomery is up to the task.
That's harsh and of course it is a transitional season. Yet, from overreliance/overburdening goaltending, to shortening the bench and exhausting his best players, to juggling lines from shift to shift FOR MONTHS, I am not sanguine about this head coach going forward.
Too much chaos, too little stability, less than sound judgement.
Again, I realize this criticism is harsh. I also realize I'm not an NHL coach.
Hear hear, and there there!