On the bench.Where was Smith on that one?
Send him to the A already.
I sense scarsm in this one!Where was Smith on that one?
Send him to the A already.
Pull the goalie that’s allowed 2 goals on 25 shots and have kept the boys in it? Would be an odd choicePull Blackwood now, he looked tire. Can't blame him after peppered with 25 shot and we're not even finish with 2nd per.
Goodrow also gave the puck away in the neutral zone prior to the goal instead of getting it deep. Lazy play, send him downSo just to be clear, we're going to spend 10 pages in the GDT talking about how Goodrow shouldn't have chased the puck-carrier who was already covered by Benning, right?
Or can we talk about Ferraro just being awful on being on absolutely no one at any point in that play?So just to be clear, we're going to spend 10 pages in the GDT talking about how Goodrow shouldn't have chased the puck-carrier who was already covered by Ferraro, right?
That's with sarcasm intended. We might need to move Blackwood to the AHL for more seasoning. He let 1 goal in. It is his fault, Blackwood is not ready for the NHL.Pull the goalie that’s allowed 2 goals on 25 shots and have kept the boys in it? Would be an odd choice
So what you are saying is smith did as the coaching staff is instructing the players to do in those situations?So just to be clear, we're going to spend 10 pages in the GDT talking about how Goodrow shouldn't have chased the puck-carrier who was already covered by Ferraro, right?
Last season our GDT’s lasted about 4 pages.So just to be clear, we're going to spend 10 pages in the GDT talking about how Goodrow shouldn't have chased the puck-carrier who was already covered by Ferraro, right?
The north remembersLast season our GDT’s lasted about 4 pages.
And my dumb jokes were about half of emLast season our GDT’s lasted about 4 pages.
I am guessing the other half was hawks win lolAnd my dumb jokes were about half of em
I think there was some confusion because Goodrow went towards the puck carrier instead of the trailer, so Ferraro was kinda caught between them. Not a fantastic play from him by any means but I don't think he's at fault for that play.Or can we talk about Ferraro just being awful on being on absolutely no one at any point in that play?
Beats me. No idea how the players are being instructed to cover rushes. I just mean that veteran defensive presence was just responsible for a goal against in the same way that our 19 year old rookie was last game, and we went insane over it.So what you are saying is smith did as the coaching staff is instructing the players to do in those situations?
I am just glad it wasn't smith that was lazy in the back check like Zetterlund was, as it would have been 200 pages of complaints.
i was thinking it was basically the same circumstances as that smith one.So just to be clear, we're going to spend 10 pages in the GDT talking about how Goodrow shouldn't have chased the puck-carrier who was already covered by Ferraro, right?
100%. Guy was one of the more unique studio hostsI kinda miss Brodie
You're probably close. Most were probably posts about other bottom feeders winning or losing.I am guessing the other half was hawks win lol
I am guessing they are, as that article from earlier today stated some teams instruct to attack the puck carrier by the first forward back. And now multiple shark players has done the same situation in back to back games. With one of those players being a veteran defensive player.I think there was some confusion because Goodrow went towards the puck carrier instead of the trailer, so Ferraro was kinda caught between them. Not a fantastic play from him by any means but I don't think he's at fault for that play.
Beats me. No idea how the players are being instructed to cover rushes. I just mean that veteran defensive presence was just responsible for a goal against in the same way that our 19 year old rookie was last game, and we went insane over it.
You miss Brodie from five years after he started. People relentlessly made fun of him when he was new. I'm happy to give the new crew time to settle in, even if it's fair to say they're a bit stilted right now.I kinda miss Brodie
To be fair, it was like one person who had 50 in-depth posts about it.Beats me. No idea how the players are being instructed to cover rushes. I just mean that veteran defensive presence was just responsible for a goal against in the same way that our 19 year old rookie was last game, and we went insane over it.
My issue is that he has plenty of time to see Goodrow as the puck carrier. Rather than step up to the open man, he continues to float backwards towards Blackwood well after the original pass to the middle from Johnston.I think there was some confusion because Goodrow went towards the puck carrier instead of the trailer, so Ferraro was kinda caught between them. Not a fantastic play from him by any means but I don't think he's at fault for that play.
Definitely possible. But if that's the case, then the defense should know that and play more of a zone defense, I would think, no?I am guessing they are, as that article from earlier today stated some teams instruct to attack the puck carrier by the first forward back. And now multiple shark players has done the same situation in back to back games. With one of those players being a veteran defensive player.
It was discussed so much that it literally made it to Jack Han on twitter. Don't think PF has that kinda sway alone.To be fair, it was like one person who had 50 in-depth posts about it.
Lol. that's funny.Definitely possible. But if that's the case, then the defense should know that and play more of a zone defense, I would think, no?
It was discussed so much that it literally made it to Jack Han on twitter. Don't think PF has that kinda sway alone.