ref19
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2017
- 1,854
- 749
Wish granted. Wow.Well that definitely a good goal,
Would feel good to be on the right side of a bad call for once
Wish granted. Wow.Well that definitely a good goal,
Would feel good to be on the right side of a bad call for once
Why couldn’t they just review the play on the first review? Good reffing would have blown that play dead when the puck was covered. Decent Redding would have ruled it no goal on the first review.Good reffing. They reviewed both things unbiased... Made the right call
Yeah no f***ing kidding that's interference. How it took this long to determine it is mind boggling
They don’t want to muddle things up…you mean they can’t look at more than one thing in the 50 times they review it? That was the most muddled review of the season.The thing is, the refs are looking at if the puck crossed the line, not if there was interference. That's up to the coach afterwards. lol. I don't like it but I get why. They don't want to muddle things up.