GDT: Game # 22 - 11/26/2022 - New York Rangers vs Edmonton Oilers - 1pm EST, MSG

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ve never seen anything like that offside no goal. Just absolutely horrible for the league completely absurd to take goals away by what a half an inch for a game of this speed. Just absolute nonsense

And then we don’t even get the angle that shows it was actually offside. Just criminal
 
Rangers down a center and Goodrow still playing wing. Gallant really does not like Goodrow at center.
 
Chytil needs to keep his head up or he's gonna get rocked some day
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW
stuck with the edmonton announcers on this stream, any word from sam/joe on Vinny? who is playing C on that line now?
 
So gallant seriously put a line together of vesey Trocheck and goodrow which is totally fine good idea for a checking line but he put them as the second line lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: duhmetreE
I’ve never seen anything like that offside no goal. Just absolutely horrible for the league completely absurd to take goals away by what a half an inch for a game of this speed. Just absolute nonsense

And then we don’t even get the angle that shows it was actually offside. Just criminal
That’s on MSG for not giving a good angle, it was pretty clearly not over the line (watching the Edmonton broadcast) and the rule is the rule. If they’re gonna review it then they’re going to go by the letter of the law. This idea of ‘well it didn’t affect the play’ is dumb, just get rid of the review if you want that and we’ll be left with 5 foot off sides calls missed then
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mandar
That’s on MSG for not giving a good angle, it was pretty clearly not over the line (watching the Edmonton broadcast) and the rule is the rule. If they’re gonna review it then they’re going to go by the letter of the law. This idea of ‘well it didn’t affect the play’ is dumb, just get rid of the review if you want that and we’ll be left with 5 foot off sides calls missed then
The difference was very minimal. There was no clearly about it. Just speculation from those calling it over the line and those calling it behind the line.
 
The puck was on the f***ing blue line how the hell was that offside???
It’s like the goal line, the puck isn’t in unless it completely crosses the line.

In order to change “states” at all (aka entering the goal, neutral zone, or defensive zone) the puck always needs to 100% cross the line or it’s not in.
 
That’s on MSG for not giving a good angle, it was pretty clearly not over the line (watching the Edmonton broadcast) and the rule is the rule. If they’re gonna review it then they’re going to go by the letter of the law. This idea of ‘well it didn’t affect the play’ is dumb, just get rid of the review if you want that and we’ll be left with 5 foot off sides calls missed then
our last challenge turned out to be miles off. Maybe if they can't say right away then it's not off? The same thing absolutely *plagues* soccer VAR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad