Post-Game Talk: Game #21: Sharks 2, Canucks 1 in OT - At least we don't play tham again this season

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
78,724
33,580
I will say this, These 5 games were the "test" vs good teams.

We went 1-4, Sure we should have won 3, but we did not.

Not good at all
 

thepuckmonster

Professional Winner.
Oct 25, 2011
31,251
684
Vancouver
tumblr_m3dv9nAtC01qfw2dno1_500.gif


TPM IRL.

**** I hate losing to the Sharks. They're such an overrated piece of **** team.
 

Luongos Knob

Daaaaa Nucks
Jan 20, 2009
4,316
621
how the **** do they lose?

HOW THE **** DO YOU LOSE?????????

idiots

if this game doesnt show the need for someone who can score, no game will.
 

Imuzi

Viaduct Villains
Mar 18, 2012
315
1
Representin' the COQ
Definition of smash and grab.

Sharks do nothing all game and come away with the two points.

Anywho, still early days and plenty more ups and downs to come.

Also Hertl is overrated as ****
 

StIllmatic

Registered User
Mar 27, 2010
4,754
0
Vancouver
I'm not too upset. I thought we dominated the Sharks and had a chance to score few more goals. Henrik and Higgins missed open nets.
 

NuxFan09

Registered User
Jun 8, 2008
21,649
2,638
Merritt, BC
This is what happens when you only score one goal all ******* game. Bad reffing or not, that is simply not good enough for a team this talented.

This. People, stop pointing fingers and put the blame where it belongs. On the team for not scoring more than 1 goal for the 3rd consecutive game. Is it that hard to just point the finger at the team?

Nope, gotta be the refs. Gotta be luck.
 

thekernel

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
6,476
3,941
People *****ing about the call? are u kidding me. It was a clear hook, You guys should be screaming at sedin not the ref.

your stick is allowed to be located in their midsection, it's only a penalty if there's a TUG. there is no TUG to be found within MILES OF THE PLAY.
 

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
8,973
8,928
I seriously think that Luongo has no choice other than to fall flat on his face when moving from side to side.

He used to be able to stay up, but as he's aged I think he honestly lost that ability.
 

Hammer Time

Registered User
May 3, 2011
3,957
11
This one stinks. We really needed that 2nd goal.

Booth didn't look that noticeable.

Why Henrik? (Also, Torts will probably regret leaving him on for 2+ minutes)
 

mossey3535

Registered User
Feb 7, 2011
14,071
11,317
Uh, the Sharks didn't exactly light it up either. Are we going to whine about their lack of secondary scoring too? Man, talk about over reaction.

Still, it's always little details in hockey. Stay on for a long shift? You take a hooking penalty. This one is on Henrik in the end.

Having said that, I think this whole thing was based on a very bad bounce. Who are we going to blame for that one, the ice maintenance crew?
 

bsjezz

Registered User
Nov 28, 2011
895
0
sharks looked horrendous all game, and they still manage to beat us because of a lax final 5 minutes

sounds about right.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad