Saying you didn’t read a single one that said that Smith made the correct read it ignoring the note by Jack Han that states some coaches want the F3 to attack the puck carrier. Yes he dismisses it a sentence later but it is very possible that Smith made the correct read based on the Sharks system.
I didn't ignore the note by Jack, I specifically screenshotted and included it because it counters the exact discussion. "Some coaches will want the F3 to attack the puck carrier, but at the OZ blue or before red line, and so this was executed poorly."
In contrast, watch the first 5 minutes of last night's game. A handful of 3 on 2's with back checkers that become 3 on 3's because the center/F3 pulls up at the red line to keep the trailer in front of him. Just like Jack Han said - attack the puck carrier at the OZ blue or before the red, maybe, but after that, shade back and pick up the trailer.
He didn't make the correct read, or he "made" it 1-2 seconds and 20-30 feet late, which means he failed to adjust and basically made the wrong read. It wasn't the only mistake, it might not have even been the biggest mistake, but it was the mistake that started the problems. Like Jack Han said, and a bunch of folks on the thread said.
This is the last post I'm going to respond to in this thread, but it's pretty clear from basic hockey knowledge to former pro coach analysis that he didn't make the right play. Who cares.
Edit after your edit: I agree what matters is Smith's development but the best thing for him is Celebrini back, freeing up Granlund to play with Smith. Kostin and Zetts aren't play drivers, Smith can't currently drive play well, but he looked better with Granlund in game 1.
He's not likely to get PP1 time, at least not yet.
We've got 2-3 seasons before we can even sniff at evaluating whether we are destroying his development, so everyone should strap in.