without Taylor, the Kings wouldn't have Kopitar and Quick, so no Cups either.
How long does Dean get a pass? Another year or 2 of terrible drafts, and maybe he'll rival Taylor in fans' scorn.
I'm not sure, Butch. To be frank, of my three sports teams across three leagues, this franchise is the most successful. So I'm inclined to give him more time purely due to what innept upper mgmt can do to a franchise, and Dean is a proven, elite GM. And I'd hate to lose that off of knee jerk, he isn't doing well lately, reactions.
On the other hand, if it's clear the franchise is sinking, and there's no clear answer for the future within his regime and Sutter's scheme, all of your guys' questions are bonafide and just.
I, personally, as a sports fanatic (who understands the rarity of GM's of DL's ilk), want to see us hold on to him for three more seasons, to see if he can start the rebuild that Futa can finish. With a full implementation of draft picks and a strong desire to gain back what we once had.
I think this braintrust is elite enough to regain that magic, get back to that upper echelon of teams in the NHL. But that it will also take a little time.
The greatest of the greats have down time (the tenured Greats). They need it to regroup. The NHL is tricky in that we can't escape albatross contracts like some of the other leagues can, so Dean has, admittedly, handcuffed the franchise on some knee jerk, heart-instead-of-head contracts.
But he has also brought us two cups, with solids draft picks, timely trades, and selecting a coach who could tap into the team and rally them to success. For me, this buys the benefit of the doubt (again, for me).
I want three more years with him, and in these three years, I want to see an upward trajectory in team philosophy that mimics those of other franchises that remain somewhat competitive (not barn-burners, mind you), while also rebuilding, like the other elite GMs across sports have done.