canuck2010
Registered User
- Dec 21, 2010
- 2,700
- 849
Yes but he should publicly apologize.
an apology wouldn't hurt
Yes but he should publicly apologize.
Podkolzin vs our boys. Can't wait for this one.
I really like this Canadian team. Lafrienere is a beast, we got some good centers, I like the defense & our goaltending was very good in the opener. Got a better feeling this year than last year.
Giving Canada its biggest loss ever (since best on best) gives me almost as much satisfaction as winning the gold
Didn't say anything positive about Canada, so not sure where you get "epitome of sportsmanship" bs. They didn't lose their cool when they had plenty of goading -- so I guess I'll give them that. Meanwhile Sokolov cross-checks Smith in the neck in the dying seconds of a blowout. On this day one team was clearly the better one, and it also happened to have no class.So, everything Russia does is classless, and everything Canada does is the epitome of sportsmanship?
Give me a break.
I called out the Russians for Kovalchuk leaving the ice at the World Championships before the Canadian anthem.
The game is over. Show some class.
Of course not.
Agreed. It just seems lazy to me to say "everyone needs to work harder!" It's a bit like saying, "Do that again, just better." I think there was a psychological component to this game. Canada came in thinking it would be easy, and Russia came in thinking they had to fight for their lives. Then Lafreniere goes down, and nobody steps up. They looked like they thought they were doomed. I know coaching isn't magic, but part of their job is to take a group of players with that kind of negative mindset and make them believe again. That didn't happen today. They just kinda stayed that way.Not sure if I agree with Jeff O’Neill.
“It’s not about Xs and Os. Just everyone has to elevate their game.”
When you get beaten all over the ice, something is wrong with the Xs and Os.
OHL players need to pick it up doing nothing?
Agreed. It just seems lazy to me to say "everyone needs to work harder!" It's a bit like saying, "Do that again, just better." I think there was a psychological component to this game. Canada came in thinking it would be easy, and Russia came in thinking they had to fight for their lives. Then Lafreniere goes down, and nobody steps up. They looked like they thought they were doomed. I know coaching isn't magic, but part of their job is to take a group of players with that kind of negative mindset and make them believe again. That didn't happen today. They just kinda stayed that way.
I just feel like Canada needs to start over. Break up the lines. Think about relaxing the system a little. Let them be more creative if they can. Give everybody a fresh look at things. Take your day off, go do something fun and distracting. Get their minds off it.
They didn't lose their cool when they had plenty of goading -- so I guess I'll give them that. Meanwhile Sokolov cross-checks Smith in the neck in the dying seconds of a blowout. On this day one team was clearly the better one, and it also happened to have no class.
I think it's also X's and O's. The part about the system. I think it's absurd to say everything went wrong, but nothing had anything to do with the system. That's a bit like saying your car broke down, but the problem isn't any of the parts.You agree its X's and O's and then elaborate on emotion and mindset ...nothing to do with X's and O's.
I'm fine with that if we win the gold.Giving Canada its biggest loss ever (since best on best) gives me almost as much satisfaction as winning the gold
I think it's also X's and O's. The part about the system. I think it's absurd to say everything went wrong, but nothing had anything to do with the system. That's a bit like saying your car broke down, but the problem isn't any of the parts.
My real expectation, though, is that they're going to bag skate these kids into Bolivian, practice the system some more, and nothing will get any better.
You are probably right. I thought that Canada simply needed a win against the Soviets to win the championship.To pip Finland for the gold, Canada needed to beat the Soviets by five goals or more in the final game. When the fight broke out with 6:07 left in the second period, Canada were up by two.
It's not like the Finns were some lucky chumps who got handed the gold by their betters.
I agree with this. Everybody wants to catastrophize and point fingers. This is the same team that beat the US (minus Lafreniere, I guess) and mostly the same Russian team that lost to the Czechs. Psychology plays a huge part. If the US had scored the 3rd goal maybe that game gets out of hand. If the first one here is called offside maybe things don't snowball out of control. How they respond to a demoralizing loss and injury will be interesting to see. It'll be a tough thing to overcome. I'd like to see them cross paths with Russia again in the medal round. Might be the same outcome, but interesting to see how they can respond.Agreed. It just seems lazy to me to say "everyone needs to work harder!" It's a bit like saying, "Do that again, just better." I think there was a psychological component to this game. Canada came in thinking it would be easy, and Russia came in thinking they had to fight for their lives. Then Lafreniere goes down, and nobody steps up. They looked like they thought they were doomed. I know coaching isn't magic, but part of their job is to take a group of players with that kind of negative mindset and make them believe again. That didn't happen today. They just kinda stayed that way.
I just feel like Canada needs to start over. Break up the lines. Think about relaxing the system a little. Let them be more creative if they can. Give everybody a fresh look at things. Take your day off, go do something fun and distracting. Get their minds off it.
He put up 30 wins and 30 losses in the regular season with a hugely talented team, and then lost in the 2nd round of the playoffs. Wasn’t brought back for a second season, as he was making very poor use of his talent. I’d say it was a far from successful coaching stint.
I agree with this. Everybody wants to catastrophize and point fingers. This is the same team that beat the US (minus Lafreniere, I guess) and mostly the same Russian team that lost to the Czechs. Psychology plays a huge part. If the US had scored the 3rd goal maybe that game gets out of hand. If the first one here is called offside maybe things don't snowball or of control. How they respond to a demoralizing loss and injury will be interesting to see. It'll be a tough thing to overcome. If like to see them cross paths with Russia again in the medal round. Might be the same outcome, but interesting to see how they can respond.
LOL. Seriously, if you look back at the roster, it was stacked.They had to be to lose to Kazakhstan by 3![]()
I do not think this can be blamed on Daws. Yes, he let in a couple of softies, but when the team scores 0 goals, it's not just the goalie. Daws had a bad game, and so did the rest of the team.
I am quite surprised how overmatched team Canada looked. On paper the 1st round pick count is 12-3 in favour of Canada, so the talent is there. Looked quite opposite on the ice. At any rate, this is the 2nd game of the tourney, plenty of time to regain the footing.
Was it wrong to keep the helmet on? Yes, of course. But Russia really does take dirty play and gloating to another level. And they do that against every team so it's not just a Canadian thing. I, like you, wish it would stop.Didn't say anything positive about Canada, so not sure where you get "epitome of sportsmanship" bs. They didn't lose their cool when they had plenty of goading -- so I guess I'll give them that. Meanwhile Sokolov cross-checks Smith in the neck in the dying seconds of a blowout. On this day one team was clearly the better one, and it also happened to have no class.
Canada is in a pickle. On paper, Daws should be the easy choice, but he hasn't been good and he hasn't inspired confidence.I do not think this can be blamed on Daws. Yes, he let in a couple of softies, but when the team scores 0 goals, it's not just the goalie. Daws had a bad game, and so did the rest of the team.
12-9-1 when he took over, 30-23-7 with him, basically identical. Boudreau had a long run but the team was sick of him, normally there’s a significant “new coach bump” in those situations, especially when the team is so talented and underperforming, but Hunter didn’t get one. And a lot of firings are framed as a “mutual decision to part ways, want to spend more time with my family”. It may have been that for real, but I’m always special when that’s the public reason.The team was in 11th place at the time though and he helped them get into the playoffs and then won the first round. He got a lot out of a season that was going nowhere.
It's also not correct to say he "wasn't brought back". He left of his own accord.