66-30-33
Registered User
It's about time we "rebuild" the D.Arizona, granted. But I loved the way the "new" defense looked.
Also wanted to give a shout to Zucker. Monster game from him.
It's about time we "rebuild" the D.Arizona, granted. But I loved the way the "new" defense looked.
Also wanted to give a shout to Zucker. Monster game from him.
It's about time we "rebuild" the D.
I'd like them to keep improving things.Glad they finally brought in a defenseman that isn't just yet another in our collection of #4/5 guys.
Maybe we should make a thread about it on the main board. Seems like a thing that would fit there.So we winning the cup going 82-0-0 and 16-0?
After I said in the 2nd intermission that I didn't like how little Rutta was being used, Sullivan definitely fixed that in the 3rd.
Defensemen TOI tonight:
1. Letang: 22:27
2. Petry: 21:39
3. Dumoulin: 18:23
4. Rutta: 18:16
5. Pettersson: 17:10
6: POJ: 15:00
Also another really encouraging sign from tonight: Sullivan didn't use Letang much on the PK at all. The 4 PKers today were Petry, Dumoulin, Rutta and Pettersson. That is exactly what the Penguins should be doing, don't burn out Letang by playing him 26 minutes a night and having him kill penalties. If Letang isn't PKing this year, he'll be at a much more manageable 24 minutes a night.
Oh no, a poorly designed bar graph. My kryptonite!All of the Zucker and Pettersson haters, cover your eyes and duck.
For real, though I find myself screaming at this team for not doing it sooner because it just looks so much better. I'm happy it's working out though and it's been something we've been clamoring for like 4 years.Glad they finally brought in a defenseman that isn't just yet another in our collection of #4/5 guys.
There's a lack of structure with new personnel on the PK right now. The middle of the box was left wide open twice.Yah but Letang is one of the best PKing D in the league. And it shows that maybe we do need him PKing if we gave up 2 to the yotes.
& Was Far Beyond DrivenMy only negative is the worry about why Sid wasn't taking faceoffs. Great starting point otherwise. Can't take much from it, but a 60 minute vulgar display of power is all you could ask for.
Sure he can afford it tooWorth it for the abuse he takes
I feel this can be true but over the last few seasons this team has lost a lot of focus and games against lesser opponents.I’m going to temper my reaction. The Yotes might be historically bad.
That Micceli kid #63 looked pretty good for a recent middle round pick tooFor Arizona - Keller is awesome.
Not talked about player: Poehling. Keeping up with his great preseason. He is REALLY good defensively, imo.
It’s literally been one game…against Arizona.Get over his last two injury riddled seasons.
It's still amazing to me that the Penguins managed to turn Matheson having a great season into Petry and Poehling. I'll never shit talk Matheson because I was probably one of his biggest fans on here, but Petry is just a clearly better player than him and brings such a welcomed element to this defense. Add on Poehling, who's not anything super special but is a solid depth guy, and it just makes it that much better.
I think this deal will have "Sutter for Bonino" impact. Petry is just so god damn good and will anchor a 2nd pair, to a point well beyond whatever Matheson or Marino could do.
Looking back at the highlights, both those PK goals against came on passes right through our box... gotta clean that up and keep the puck on the perimeter like they were so good at last year.
Yeah, Keller reminds me a lot of Jake. Really smart player.
How does the almighty bar graph account for him taking 2 penalties that resulted in PP goals because his guy got behind him and he had to haul him down?He was on the ice for 16 shots for and 2 GF at 5v5.
7 HDCF to 1 HDCA.