THe dump and chase strategy against Dallas' D wasn't really working either. They have a really mobile and strong D core that can move the puck really well. We just couldn't put any sort of pressure on them.
GDT: Game 03 - Winnipeg Jets @ Colorado Avalanche- Wednesday, October 19th, 2022 - 7:00pm CDT - SN1/SNW - CJOB/POWER 97
- Thread starter macmaroon
- Start date
- Status
THe dump and chase strategy against Dallas' D wasn't really working either. They have a really mobile and strong D core that can move the puck really well. We just couldn't put any sort of pressure on them.
- Jun 10, 2014
- 58,958
- 31,478
Ok, which 20 minutes?
I prefer all of them to be honest .....
Sure, 60 sounds like it would be nice. Not sure I can remember ever seeing that, so I'm not sure.
First 10 is good, getting that first goal is supposed to be important. Last 10 and last goal also works for me, at least if Helle can hold the fort in between.
Any minutes in any 2nd period would be a change of pace.
nobody imp0rtant
Registered pessimist
- May 23, 2018
- 10,950
- 18,297
Sure, 60 sounds like it would be nice. Not sure I can remember ever seeing that, so I'm not sure.
First 10 is good, getting that first goal is supposed to be important. Last 10 and last goal also works for me, at least if Helle can hold the fort in between.
Any minutes in any 2nd period would be a change of pace.
Yeah tough to keep the pedal to the metal for 60 minutes straight. There's always gonna be an ebb and flow to every game. It's more about how you weather that ebb and flow when the momentum shifts. Even the worst teams in the league will win some games.
The only RD that Morrissey's done worse with in the last 3-4 seasons is Tucker Poolman
Also looks like Samberg's going in unless Demelo's getting benched for poor play
Why do we have 4 players on the 4th line... ?
Is that a new NHL handicap system... ?
Meh... go with the Flow'....
AlphaLackey
Registered User
"Of course, there are people who will be biased against a woman doing the job - so she'll always fight that", and that's absolutely true enough. Just remember to include in your equation that there are also people who will be biased in favour of a woman doing the job, so she'll always benefit from that.
As for whether she has a chance to improve? Of course anything is possible, but based on how she's responded so far, I'd think it'll be a long shot.
When you hand-wave away the 99%+ of your negative feedback that is substantive criticism of your ability, then elevate the sub-1% of it that's bog-standard internet trolls, and use that belligerent minority to cast aspersions on anyone who criticizes you?
When you suggest you receive unprecedented levels of negative feedback and vitriol that no man in sports broadcasting ever had to field, as if Pierre MacGuire doesn't exist and Howard Cosell didn't?
When you suggest that your actual skill level is merely "not the best", when it's in fact "among the worst"?
Next to the many competent women in sports broadcasting and play-by-play have performed and how they handle themselves, Leah's responses have been as distorted and off-the-mark as a funhouse mirror reflection.
... note that NONE of this, by the way, is me criticizing you or anyone else that likes her style. That is absolutely your prerogative and you certainly are a very knowledgeable hockey mind, so it's not like you're speaking like some Joe Blow just stirring up shit on the internet. But like I said closer to the start of the year, I was so much happier hearing that she was being put back in a position to succeed, as she really is an effective reporter and of course a very keen sports aficionado.
The worst team in the league, on the road, against the best team in the league at home is almost always no worse than a 3-1 underdog. That means winning about 25% of the time. And as any gambler can tell you, this is a very very VERY big number.
I agree about the Winnipeg Mint. It's quite striking, However, it's obvious that you've never been to Denver if you think that it's a $#!t hole relative to Winnipeg....and I've lived here all of my life.Thanks @macmaroon
Denver looks like a Shit hole to me!
GO JETS GO….
I prefer our Mint!
View attachment 595967
Bo' knows swear words...
Bo' knows sarcasm...
Bo' knows Covid...
Bo' knows what he's up against now...
Go Jets Go... or else...
Pffft... Scarlett...
Bo' knows sarcasm...
Bo' knows Covid...
Bo' knows what he's up against now...
Go Jets Go... or else...
Pffft... Scarlett...
None
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2012
- 11,875
- 17,589
That's what I was trying to suggest, that unless both get better that's not really a first pair. Even if they were to be sheltered then what, we'd expose Dillon-Schmidt or Samberg-Demelo to those matchups instead?
Morrissey hasn't really elevated Pionk's game in the past and Pionk's game has just been lacking since we left the Canadian division.
I think I just don't like our roster of defensemen. To me there just isn't any good combination of pairs.
sipowicz
The thrill is gone
- Mar 16, 2011
- 32,265
- 43,273
Yup, hate to lose one of our top 4 forwards!
Our bantam sized D really needs a decent puck moving D man with size but they aren’t exactly falling out of trees!
Thing would fall into place a lot better if we had a true #1. Morrissey and Pionk are both 2/3 types at best. Dillon and DeMelo are both more 4-6 types depending on the day. Stanley is a 7/8 at this point and Samberg is largely untested but I don't think he has #1 upside, probably closer to where Dillon and DeMelo are. Heinola's realistic ceiling is probably more of a 2/3 offensive type as well. We just really need to get ourselves a true #1 and the only way that's likely going to happen in through the draft.
ICdave
Registered User
Hope folks will join us tonight on the IC Post-Game Show:
This season you’ll have a chance to win great schwag including authentic Jets jerseys, hats, Moose tickets, etc after every single game (For a variety of ways to enter click here).
Be part of the conversation tonight following the final buzzer.
P.S. Even if I preferred you join us you don't have to in order to win. There are a variety of ways to enter.
This season you’ll have a chance to win great schwag including authentic Jets jerseys, hats, Moose tickets, etc after every single game (For a variety of ways to enter click here).
Be part of the conversation tonight following the final buzzer.
P.S. Even if I preferred you join us you don't have to in order to win. There are a variety of ways to enter.
I'd really like to see what this Axil Fjallby can do as well. We're going to need a lot of Axil grease if we expect to beat the Avs without Ehlers in the lineup.
Or we could all just agree to call him Gorgeous.
I understand they have injections now which will control eyebrow spasms.AxelJo in, ScarJo says...
Last edited:
If you want her to be always young and sexy, don't look up "Heather Locklear now" on Google Images. Kinda scary.
Stumbledore
Registered User
Well, I just looked up "Inanna" on Wikipedia. Definitely scary, LOL.
bennylundholm
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2014
- 3,904
- 5,208
gojetsgo
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2015
- 11,203
- 31,552
well it's not the injury that might keep him out and lmao trying to blame scheifele for it when ehlers stuck his hand out to block it...
JetsFan815
Replacement Level Poster
- Jan 16, 2012
- 19,697
- 25,795
Ehlers took shifts after blocking that shot with his hand. Arniel said that he has a nagging lowerbody injury before last game, I assume it is related to that.
Stumbledore
Registered User
Any update yet on whether Ehlers is playing tonight?
Last I heard he was going to be a game time decision. Well, it's almost game time...
Last I heard he was going to be a game time decision. Well, it's almost game time...
The Blue Baron
Registered User
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
GDT: Joue au Pickard s'il te plaît. Les Pétroliers v l'Hab. 5:30 en Prime.- Latest: KeithIsActuallyBad
-
-
-
