unicornpig
Registered User
- Dec 8, 2017
- 3,755
- 5,493
Rangers are reciprocally in the same place.Actually, he is exactly the type of forward the Kings need. He's a big forward that can play multiple positions. I don't see the Kings being interested in moving him at all. If they did, the cost would be so prohibitive that I doubt any team would be interested. Right now isn't the time to be moving any of their youth.
again noAgain, Nils Lundkvist for Gabe Vilardi
theres nothing of interest on the leafs that would sense.
Again, Nils Lundkvist for Gabe Vilardi
I don't think you get either of those players for Vilardi 1-1
I don't know what LA would need to add to entice Tampa to trade Sergachev, but something like Vilardi and Kempe as a starting point would be of great interest. Or perhaps just LA's first round pick with smaller pieces if need be. The only pieces I'd keep off the table for Sergachev are Byfield and Clarke.
That wouldn't be near enough from the Kings point of view.Sandin is too much from the Leafs, Lilj is prob not enough for the Kings
if we can work something out in between that I’m down, but i don’t know if there’s a fit
I like Vilardi for Kravtsov
It should be 100% availableLa’s 1st should not even remotely be available.
my offers? I've only suggested to the Leafs fan what would be a fair deal and answered it
and you certainly do not get sergachev or chyt for vilardi 1-1, just like the offer you just liked suggests
I like Vilardi for Kravtsov
We already know this, but Kings fans do not like this idea and you know this.
sorry.. misread that.. mea culpaThat’s why he clearly said “iN a PaCkAgE”
I guess technically that IS 2 offers ..This was your offers, is it not?
“silly.. the correct answer if Kerfoot+3rd
how about Sandin? Lily's not enuff.. is Sandin more appropriate?”
I use this forum to share my ideas, not appease Kings fans...
La’s 1st should not even remotely be available.
His value is a second round pick IMO.
Same as Andersson when the Rangers traded him.
LOLAgain, Nils Lundkvist for Gabe Vilardi
Definitely better than Andersson and worth more. At least Vilardi has put up somewhat respectable numbers in his short career so far.His value is a second round pick IMO.
Same as Andersson when the Rangers traded him.
Is the "want to move Vilardi to the wing position" so he doesn't get lost in the shuffle, or because you don't really see him as a top 6 center, ever? If it's the latter, maybe that should tell fans something about wanting to make a trade for him as a center.
Actually, he is exactly the type of forward the Kings need. He's a big forward that can play multiple positions. I don't see the Kings being interested in moving him at all. If they did, the cost would be so prohibitive that I doubt any team would be interested. Right now isn't the time to be moving any of their youth.