Willy Stylez
Wiff
- Mar 14, 2015
- 3,721
- 653
If Larsson got Hall, Lindholm would get a huge return . Lindholm is much better than Larsson and Landeskog is not as good as Hall.
1 of the top young dmen in the league who is already performing at high levels should check him out.Thaaaaat's not really how that works, but then again I'm not all that familiar with Lindholm. Bear in mind that Erik Johnson had #1 written all over him when we acquired him as well - I feel like Landeskog is at least a known quantity and a good one.
Landeskog > Hall
Regardless, Why would AVS trade their Captain?
Landeskog is not better than Hall.
Hall could return Lindholm 1 for 1 had the Oilers been interested in trading Hall to a team in the West and had the Ducks been interested in trading Lindholm.
Landeskog could not bring back Lindholm 1 for 1. There would have to be an add on the Avs part.
If Larsson got Hall, Lindholm would get a huge return . Lindholm is much better than Larsson and Landeskog is not as good as Hall.
Larsson is a RD, Lindholm a LD.
Handedness in defencemen means a lot, when it comes to value.
There are so few top-4 young defencemen that are playing RD.
1 of the top young dmen in the league who is already performing at high levels should check him out.
If Larsson got Hall, Lindholm would get a huge return . Lindholm is much better than Larsson and Landeskog is not as good as Hall.
I can't wait for the next decent d-man to be traded so everyone can stop using the Hall-Larsson deal as the new benchmark. Edmonton knew they were overpaying and their hands were tied because they needed a massive shakeup. That trade does not in any way signify the new market value for d-men so I wish people would stop using it as so.
lol great in-depth info, thanks. I'm familiar enough with him to know his reputation, what I'm wondering is why he has it. His stats aren't mind-blowing, what does he excel at?
If Anaheim was willing to trade Lindholm for a W they would already have Taylor Hall.
Landeskog is not better than Hall.
Hall could return Lindholm 1 for 1 had the Oilers been interested in trading Hall to a team in the West and had the Ducks been interested in trading Lindholm.
Landeskog could not bring back Lindholm 1 for 1. There would have to be an add on the Avs part.
I can't wait for the next decent d-man to be traded so everyone can stop using the Hall-Larsson deal as the new benchmark. Edmonton knew they were overpaying and their hands were tied because they needed a massive shakeup. That trade does not in any way signify the new market value for d-men so I wish people would stop using it as so.
Sorry, no GM would choose Hall over Landeskog.
No GM wouldn’t choose Hall over Landeskog, and that’s coming from someone who thinks Hall is overrated.
thw just tossing crao against the wall
roy gone---no trades
This should enlighten you a little bit. http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/anahem-ducks-blueliner-hampus-lindholm-changing-way-judge-nhl-defencemen/
If only Bieksa would waive his NMC before the expansion draft, Anaheim wouldn't end up losing any of their defensemen via trade or expansion.
Landeskog is not better than Hall.
Hall could return Lindholm 1 for 1 had the Oilers been interested in trading Hall to a team in the West and had the Ducks been interested in trading Lindholm.
Landeskog could not bring back Lindholm 1 for 1. There would have to be an add on the Avs part.
Larsson is a RD, Lindholm a LD.
Handedness in defencemen means a lot, when it comes to value.
There are so few top-4 young defencemen that are playing RD.