Future POWERHOUSE -- yay or nay?
- Thread starter Axl Rhoadz
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Rorschach
Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
I think the road is long and windy, and you will need some insane luck to fall your way. But first you must head the right direction.
I believe we all feel the previous regime under Dean Lombardi, their success was not only beyond many of ours' wildest dreams, we also feel His way is now the Kings' way and we would like to emulate this in order to duplicate that recent past success.
Looking at 2009, we had a bunch of nice young forwards. I would say our prospect pool was even deeper now than then, although we don't have the Drew Doughty. And no one yet has emerged to be our Kopitar...plus we don't know if Petersen will become our Quick. But our overall defensive depth is no where near as bad as 2008 when DL had to spend all the early picks on defensemen.
Normally, we like to have a lot of leadership on our team. One thing we prided the 2012 on that DL built was the number of potential Cs and As we got from other teams and added on to our team as glue guys. Of all the things that Danault brings, that's one of the things I think he brings. Edler is no Mitchell so I don't count him. But Arvidsson certainly brings some. So we took a BIG step forward on that. Hopefully once some of these other overpaid, old Kings fall off the books, we can poach some more 24-28 YOs with significant NHL experience from other teams too stupid to retain them.
So we're on our way. But I feel like this is our 2010/11 season.
I believe we all feel the previous regime under Dean Lombardi, their success was not only beyond many of ours' wildest dreams, we also feel His way is now the Kings' way and we would like to emulate this in order to duplicate that recent past success.
Looking at 2009, we had a bunch of nice young forwards. I would say our prospect pool was even deeper now than then, although we don't have the Drew Doughty. And no one yet has emerged to be our Kopitar...plus we don't know if Petersen will become our Quick. But our overall defensive depth is no where near as bad as 2008 when DL had to spend all the early picks on defensemen.
Normally, we like to have a lot of leadership on our team. One thing we prided the 2012 on that DL built was the number of potential Cs and As we got from other teams and added on to our team as glue guys. Of all the things that Danault brings, that's one of the things I think he brings. Edler is no Mitchell so I don't count him. But Arvidsson certainly brings some. So we took a BIG step forward on that. Hopefully once some of these other overpaid, old Kings fall off the books, we can poach some more 24-28 YOs with significant NHL experience from other teams too stupid to retain them.
So we're on our way. But I feel like this is our 2010/11 season.
We didn't leadership a a Stanley Cup.
We had a very talented defense first team, with a 2nd line where all players scored around 30 goals
You still need to put a puck into a net and i have never seen someone leadershipping or locker rooming a puck into the net
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
-
Beanpot Boston University vs Harvard - TD Garden, BostonWagers: 7Staked: $19,456.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
