saska sault
Registered User
Stamkos and a defenseman please Steve, some creativity in the crease would be welcomed also but that may not be the easiest task with Husso around.
do we really want Matt Roy at some ridiculous contract like 6x6 though?Looks like Montour is going to Seattle.
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Really need to get Roy now. And/or Skjei.
Yesdo we really want Matt Roy at some ridiculous contract like 6x6 though?
I don't know how you expect these bad defenseman to be gone if we don't add anyone who is clearly better.do we really want Matt Roy at some ridiculous contract like 6x6 though?
That sounds like robbing Peter to pay Paul. You want the instant gratification of 34 year-old Stamkos while ignoring what impact his cap hit will have on this team when we approach our competitive window three years from now. Stamkos will fall off of a cliff at some point. My guess is that it occurs during the next four years (like most players). He improves us during the short term, but makes us worse when we really need him to make us better.Because he still has a fantastic shot and would be one of the 3-4 best forwards on the team.
If somebody goes 6x6 that's one thing. But if Detroit could get him for something like 5.5x4 I'd be all over that.
Literally would prefer Maatta or Johansson.All signs are pointing that way.
yeah, I get that...but like, Matt Roy is not worth 6 million per year. I just don't think Yzerman should panic and sign another "good ol' Michigan boy" to an overpriced deal just beacuseI don't know how you expect these bad defenseman to be gone if we don't add anyone who is clearly better.
This is really sick....
Senators once had imo, the NHL best kid center core in Stutzle, Norris, Pinto and Kastelic.
- Now, Norris could be injured for rest of the career (both shoulders) with 8-year 8M deal.
- Kastelic was just traded to Boston, because they got Ullmark, and wanted to get rid of Korpisalo's long deal.
- And Pinto is wanting out.
Poor Stutzle.
I don't care about last year. I care about the next three or four.you need someone else to explain to you why people want a free agent that just scored 40 goals this year?
Ok well they are off the table and it's possible Montour and Pesce just didn't want to come here.yeah, I get that...but like, Matt Roy is not worth 6 million per year. I just don't think Yzerman should panic and sign another "good ol' Michigan boy" to an overpriced deal just beacuse
Like Montour is wayyyyyy better than Roy, Personally I would have given Montour more than Seattle just gave him. Of course there needs to be a desire by the player to sign, but if we give Roy over 5 million, I don't like it.
Pesce is way better than Matt Roy, so if we pay Roy more than Pesce, thats a bad look.
do we really want Matt Roy at some ridiculous contract like 6x6 though?
You know when people who win the lottery overpay for stuff? It is like thatI don't care about last year. I care about the next three or four.
Literally no clue who this is.. why do we want him?Duhaime
I guess I just don’t see how this team in good faith says it wants to compete next season and then run a first pairing that we’ve seen struggle consistently. If you’re first pair is busted it’s tough to stack wins.All signs are pointing that way.
Maybe that cap hit on a bridge deal, but I don't think Seider signs long term for that money with the cap going up the way it is.Just looking straight stats wise... 8x7 for Seider?