Because I'm bored at work. I hate wedding season.
Yo how much ****ing money are the Isles spending on bottom-6 forwards?
over 20M LOLYo how much ****ing money are the Isles spending on bottom-6 forwards?
Dallas would be an interesting landing spot for Karlsson. If they do it without sending Heiskanen or Klingberg that would be highway robbery. They do have Lindell who is an underrated player. They also have Point and Oettinger and I bet Ottawa would love a high end goalie in the pipeline. Hintz is an interesting prospect as well, so they're not totally devoid of the pieces to make it happen without Heiskanen or Klingberg.
Ah yes, the plan
1. Be bad for three years just because
2. Collect character
3. ????
4. Win cup
Could be trying to go the Toronto model and build a nucleus of cost-controlled top assets, cheap depth, and the flexibility to add a big name in the next year or two.Ah yes, the plan
1. Be bad for three years just because
2. Collect character
3. ????
4. Win cup
Could be trying to go the Toronto model and build a nucleus of cost-controlled top assets, cheap depth, and the flexibility to add a big name in the next year or two.
I’d rather try to get the elite asset while he’s potentially available for cheaper than he’s worth.
What would Chevy realistically give up for Zucc? Prospect other than Ves and a 2nd?
Ah yes, the plan
1. Be bad for three years just because
2. Collect character
3. ????
4. Win cup
They just got the Swedish goalie prospect in the Brass deal. Getting Heiskanen would make too much sense for Ottawa, especially if Bobby Ryan isn’t part of the deal.
I legitimately don't understand your problem with the plan. They are stockpiling draft picks and young players. They just drafted a highly skilled Russian forward at 9OA. They seem to be willing to be bad again next year to have a chance at another really high end kid.
What should they be doing otherwise? Trying to make the playoffs next year?
I legitimately don't understand your problem with the plan. They are stockpiling draft picks and young players. They just drafted a highly skilled Russian forward at 9OA. They seem to be willing to be bad again next year to have a chance at another really high end kid.
What should they be doing otherwise? Trying to make the playoffs next year?
Yea the thing is this is a rare year. When was the last time someone like Tavares and Karlsson were available? Rarely happens. Sometimes things happen and you have to accelerate your timeline. I wouldn't be banking on Seguin or Panarin becoming FA next year.
I’d only guess Panarin, but I agree with you. I’d love to have EK65, and I posted in the July 1 thread how this rebuild has already been kickstarted since the Brassard trade.Without sending Klingberg? Klingberg has more value than Karlsson.
Yea the thing is this is a rare year. When was the last time someone like Tavares and Karlsson were available? Rarely happens. Sometimes things happen and you have to accelerate your timeline. I wouldn't be banking on Seguin or Panarin becoming FA next year.
Do they even need wingers?
Reason and logic have no place in this thread.Adjusting the plan if a player of this caliber becomes available.
True but I consider Point and Oettinger to be significantly better prospects than Gustavsson.
You don't, but with the Rangers pockets, and the propensity for players to want to play here, it would be foolish to not go after elite talent that just costs money.Why do we need to count on signing a big name free agent at all?