He'd be the 5th D-man on this team at best, and the only D-man currently on this roster that I'd commit 7 years to is McD.
wow you really have no clue what youre talking about
He'd be the 5th D-man on this team at best, and the only D-man currently on this roster that I'd commit 7 years to is McD.
There's a report out of Quebec that the Flyers and Habs are working on a multi-player deal involving Talbot and Coburn.
http://translate.google.com/transla...lbot-et-braydon-coburn-a-montreal-250984.html
Except it's been proven having Henrik Lundqvist isn't enough. Hank has been here eight years, and we've won five playoff series total in those eight years. In the NHL, that's a huge sample size.
We would need MUCH better players in front of Hank to be legitimate contenders every year.
should've kept Rupp?
wow you really have no clue what youre talking about
should've kept Rupp?
What we don't? We have a star player (Nash), an elite goaltender (Henrik), great young defenseman (McDonagh), emerging young players.
The rest is maneuvering. We have a legit chance to win the Cup, yes. Not sure if you were being sarcastic.
Bring in a good GM
Well he'd arguably be the 5th best dman if Staal is healthy, but probably 4th. Is he better than McD, Staal, or Girardi? I don't know man.
LeBrun: "David Clarkson signed a big deal in Toronto but I can tell you he left money on the table elsewhere..."
Why would anyone offer him more than that?
LeBrun: "David Clarkson signed a big deal in Toronto but I can tell you he left money on the table elsewhere..."
Why would anyone offer him more than that?
So pissed about Bobby Ryan. We could have offered a better deal then that.
So pissed about Bobby Ryan. We could have offered a better deal then that.
My exact thoughts. Hamonic is really tough to play against.hamonic would easily be ahead of girardi and del zotto. depending on how staal plays when he comes back, hamonic would be either #2 or #3 on this team.
Except it's been proven having Henrik Lundqvist isn't enough. Hank has been here eight years, and we've won five playoff series total in those eight years. In the NHL, that's a huge sample size.
We would need MUCH better players in front of Hank to be legitimate contenders every year.
Would you really want to though? I am not sure I would. You would be looking at something like Kreider + Miller + 1st '14.
I don't think I would take that considering how inconsistent he is.
So pissed about Bobby Ryan. We could have offered a better deal then that.
Well he'd arguably be the 5th best dman if Staal is healthy, but probably 4th. Is he better than McD, Staal, or Girardi? I don't know man.
The point is that we have a good/great team. We have made it to the second round two years in a row and one ECF appearance. Thus, if Lundqvist plays otherworldly, and we get a few surprises, we can find ourselves in the finals with our current roster.
Obviously you want to improve every year, but we don't need to model our team after other teams.
Would you really want to though? I am not sure I would. You would be looking at something like Kreider + Miller + 1st '14.
I don't think I would take that considering how inconsistent he is.
Would you really want to though? I am not sure I would. You would be looking at something like Kreider + Miller + 1st '14.
I don't think I would take that considering how inconsistent he is.
Sens paid pretty good imo