Pastor Of Muppetz
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 26,387
- 16,361
Derek Grant is a quality defensive center who scored 15 goals last year and is a flat-out better hockey player than Beagle, is 5 years younger, and is a local guy ... and just signed for $1.5 million.
Honest question: what kind of picks do you think would need to be added to either of those packages to garner a top end D in return? Because I think 2-3 first rounders ought to do it.Benning best option long term is to trade for a top end Defenseman
Virtanen, Rousell/Eriksson, Picks and Lind/Rafferty for a Ekblad/OEL.
We shift bad salary to something that brings value. Most important aspect should be to keep Podkolzin/Rathbone/Hoglander/Juolevi if it is possible.
Or even something like Gaudette+Virtanen+Loui/Rousell+Pick for A top end Defenseman
This would open up cap space to spend salary in FA and pick up a top pairing Defenseman in trade
No team is taking that package for a stud dman.Benning best option long term is to trade for a top end Defenseman
Virtanen, Rousell/Eriksson, Picks and Lind/Rafferty for a Ekblad/OEL.
We shift bad salary to something that brings value. Most important aspect should be to keep Podkolzin/Rathbone/Hoglander/Juolevi if it is possible.
Or even something like Gaudette+Virtanen+Loui/Rousell+Pick for A top end Defenseman
This would open up cap space to spend salary in FA and pick up a top pairing Defenseman in trade
For a prime Defenseman like Ekblad yeah, the players i would target that wouldn't cost a leg and a arm are Doogie Hamilton and OEL.Honest question: what kind of picks do you think would need to be added to either of those packages to garner a top end D in return? Because I think 2-3 first rounders ought to do it.
Unlike the OEL deal, I have a feeling that if Florida were to trade Ekblad, they wont take back bad contracts..Just a hunchBenning best option long term is to trade for a top end Defenseman
Virtanen, Rousell/Eriksson, Picks and Lind/Rafferty for a Ekblad/OEL.
We shift bad salary to something that brings value. Most important aspect should be to keep Podkolzin/Rathbone/Hoglander/Juolevi if it is possible.
Or even something like Gaudette+Virtanen+Loui/Rousell+Pick for A top end Defenseman
This would open up cap space to spend salary in FA and pick up a top pairing Defenseman in trade
Can Vegas just sign Petro and trade us Schmidt already
Unlike the OEL deal, I have a feeling that if Florida were to trade Ekblad, they wont take back bad contracts..Just a hunch
I'm also not convinced at all that we wouldn't be on Schmidt's NTC list. Vancouver is not exactly a popular destination for guys from the Eastern US. Edit - or maybe he's fine to go to Winnipeg? Who knows???
If nothing pans out in terms of a trade then Canucks will play their Utica defenceman or sign depth defenceman at 1 year contracts. There is no incentive for Canucks to sign free agents to long term contracts in another covid season. There is no revenue flowing from Rogers Arena and Canucks will have an ample amount of cap space and flexibility next season to sign Pettersson/Hughes/Demko and add one more key piece while Podkolzin/Hoglander enter the lineup on ELCs.
My theory is Canucks will let Juolevi or Rathbone play the year out to gain NHL experience and next year they target Dougie Hamilton. Hamilton was one of Benning's picks in Boston and I bet Benning is salivating over him as a free agent. Canucks also want Tryamkin back, he's take a considerable step this season in the KHL with Bill Peters as the coach, he's being used as their top pairing and playing in every situation. This upcoming year will be a transition year for the defence so don't expect any home run moves at this point forward.
Agreed, there's definitely more moves incoming, they're not just going to throw rookies into the deep end of the pool...Rathbone /and or Juolevi are going to get a great opportunity here.I can’t see Green and Benning being OK with just throwing in 2 - possibly 3 - rookies onto the blueline. It doesn’t set the kids up for success and it doesn’t set the team up for success. And it runs completely counter to how they’ve handled such situations before.
Good or bad, Benning is going to do something about it.
How we feel about Vince Dunn?
Fair, but that sweetener would not be significant. Looking at similar players traded for value such as Gudbranson, at most we’d add a mid round pickWe're seeing a lot of actual good players like Murray being dumped for almost nothing because of the flat cap. Others include Maata, Saad, Nutivaara, Johnsson and Stastny. These are all positive value assets netting zilch on the market.
Roussel has been reduced to a 4th line role (as seen in the playoffs). If he establishes himself in the top 9 again next year maybe he can recoup some of his value but it's hard to say given how little trust Green puts in that duo of him and Gaudette. Right now he's overpaid for what he brings and is a negative asset.
Beagle was legitimately one of the worst forwards in the league last year - we get absolutely killed in possession whenever he's out there. Why would anyone take him on for free without demanding a sweetener on top?
I truly believe Gaudette+Virtanen+1st+3rd/Prospect+Rousel would get us Ekblad or Dougie Hamilton.
Virtanen+Sutter, 2nd+3rd+ Juolevi gets us OEL
Look at the Karlsson, Dougie Hamilton, ROR, Duchene tradesNo, it doesn't.