HoweHullOrr
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 11,928
- 2,416
So you're saying Peter Jackson is going to help us get Karlsson back?
I enjoyed that. Thanks for sharing that video.
So you're saying Peter Jackson is going to help us get Karlsson back?
Every man has his price. Will they eat half and throw in a pick for us to take him? Then I would honestly think about it. Maybe get another team to eat some more as well. Sure.
It's been so long since we've been able to say something like this lolThe problem is that we don't have any obvious bad contracts to move for Karlsson, and we don't have the cap flexibility to add player that isn't a direct need for 5M. If we still had Korpisalo, Karlsson @ 5M for Korpisalo @ 4M and an asset would make sense even if we don't outright need Karlsson.
Yes, would have been really interesting to see that band keep going and producing music. They (Beatles) were prodigious. McCartney, Lennon & Harrison together were greater than the sum of their parts. So, it would been interesting to see what they would have produced if they kept going and technology advanced.Oooh a Beatles reference!
We were robbed of a reunion, especially with Lennon's solo work being so underwhelming and a waste of time imo, but Wings was so incredible that I'm glad they broke up. Criminally underrated catalogue, even though it is still revered, and really extends the Beatles experience more than any of their solo work.
when you correct for games played, the Sens are 2/3 in the division for "goals for" and 2/3 for "goals against."The maximum Karlsson's contract can be retained to is 5M. Contract retention can only be done twice.
Pittsburgh is not going to package a pick with him. I could see them giving him away for "free" and taking back bad contracts that aren't buyout proof. But including a pick would go against their goal, which is apparently to rebuild their pool of assets.
The problem is that we don't have any obvious bad contracts to move for Karlsson, and we don't have the cap flexibility to add player that isn't a direct need for 5M. If we still had Korpisalo, Karlsson @ 5M for Korpisalo @ 4M and an asset would make sense even if we don't outright need Karlsson.
Kind of interesting how a lack of reflection (understanding, consideration, whatever) and common sense seem to work hand-in-hand for some. I’m just not getting the idea of Karlsson to Ottawa either except for the pure nostalgia element I suppose.The maximum Karlsson's contract can be retained to is 5M. Contract retention can only be done twice.
Pittsburgh is not going to package a pick with him. I could see them giving him away for "free" and taking back bad contracts that aren't buyout proof. But including a pick would go against their goal, which is apparently to rebuild their pool of assets.
The problem is that we don't have any obvious bad contracts to move for Karlsson, and we don't have the cap flexibility to add player that isn't a direct need for 5M. If we still had Korpisalo, Karlsson @ 5M for Korpisalo @ 4M and an asset would make sense even if we don't outright need Karlsson.
Kind of interesting how a lack of reflection (understanding, consideration, whatever) and common sense seem to work hand-in-hand for some. I’m just not getting the idea of Karlsson to Ottawa either except for the pure nostalgia element I suppose.
Don't see how we can make Karlsson work anytime soon. Maybe if there's a good chunk of retention in the summer of 2027 or he gets bought out and we sign him for cheap as a UFA.
why the obsession. He is no longer the Karlsson that left here.Don't see how we can make Karlsson work anytime soon. Maybe if there's a good chunk of retention in the summer of 2027 or he gets bought out and we sign him for cheap as a UFA.
It's been so long since we've been able to say something like this lol
I think it has more to do with the fact that he's still decent and obviously wants to come here. The only reason I'd trade for him in a couple years is if Jensen declines and/or leaves and we have a hole at RD. I'm not going to prematurely pencil in Yakemchuk there right now.why the obsession. He is no longer the Karlsson that left here.
He is 34, has slowed. Was a -26 when he scored those 101 points 2 years ago.
what is left of the guy, belongs on some team that uses him on the powerplay, pays him 3-5 M and plays him 16-17 min. And is a stone's throw away from a cup.
At the moment, with his salary. It is not possible.
In 2-3 years, he will be 36 and 37, and what may be left?
Yes, some (many?) trade posts could be fantasy type trade proposals. In fact, I’ve asked that question before a number of times including in the threads that are specifically focused on rosters and cap (for this year, next year, etc.). Its when you see posts that talk about adding a $2.5 m cap hit for a player off of waivers and adding that player to our current 3rd pairing that make it difficult to tell and make you wonder. Just using that as an example as there’s plenty of them floating around.I think you have to take trade thread talk with a grain of salt, especially this time of year when there are nearly no rumours or traction with trades.
As in, people will discuss every possible rumour or available player and see how we could acquire them, but that doesn't always mean that they actually think we should. I think it's more of a thought exercise. People aren't always going to preface their ideas with "I know this isn't what we need but he is rumoured to be available let's see how this works for fun."
As far as Karlsson goes, I think it's kind of like your first serious high school girlfriend. You remember the fun you had running around in the summer, all the big firsts. You have a place for them in your heart, and maybe sometimes you catch yourself thinking about them every few years, but if you ran into them at the Rideau Center you wouldn't seriously want to pursue a relationship with them. You know that it was something of the time that cannot be recaptured but sometimes it's fun to browse their Facebook at 2AM and cry.
Okay, but you may be trading one faded veteran for another. ( as in spots, not a team to team trade)I think it has more to do with the fact that he's still decent and obviously wants to come here. The only reason I'd trade for him in a couple years is if Jensen declines and/or leaves and we have a hole at RD. I'm not going to prematurely pencil in Yakemchuk there right now.
We'll be missing a first rounder this year or next year, don't have next years 2nd, and don't have prospects to trade. Yakemchuk is untouchable right now, Halliday, Sebrango, Andonovski & Ostapchuk are the only prospects of value but at this point I feel its better to let them cook and start having some cheap elc talent to help out in a year or two if we get injuries than moving them. Plus no one is giving us an upgrade on RD for any of those guys.Which is good because we don't really have much to trade in that regard after Dorion sold so much of the team's future on shortsighted acquisitions.
Ostapchuk is the only guy there who has value. The others are just contracts to even out deals.We'll be missing a first rounder this year or next year, don't have next years 2nd, and don't have prospects to trade. Yakemchuk is untouchable right now, Halliday, Sebrango, Andonovski & Ostapchuk are the only prospects of value but at this point I feel its better to let them cook and start having some cheap elc talent to help out in a year or two if we get injuries than moving them. Plus no one is giving us an upgrade on RD for any of those guys.
Really hope the current roster can make some noise while we try to replenish assets.
Going forward we should be drafting a couple long RDs with some strong defensive/shutdown abilities to have in the pipeline. This draft has a couple .And it's been so long since we had so few glaring weaknesses on the roster.
Could use some depth at RD and insurance at LD, but other than that I don't see much wrong with the lineup that is worth trading picks/prospects to improve.
Which is good because we don't really have much to trade in that regard after Dorion sold so much of the team's future on shortsighted acquisitions.
A bit of a misnomer. ELC starts at 20 when you are in the minors. a YEAR can be burnt if you come out of college and play a handful of games.We'll be missing a first rounder this year or next year, don't have next years 2nd, and don't have prospects to trade. Yakemchuk is untouchable right now, Halliday, Sebrango, Andonovski & Ostapchuk are the only prospects of value but at this point I feel its better to let them cook and start having some cheap elc talent to help out in a year or two if we get injuries than moving them. Plus no one is giving us an upgrade on RD for any of those guys.
Really hope the current roster can make some noise while we try to replenish assets.
Yeah i was trying to cover myself there by saying any of the available Penguins vets since i know they said he wasnt available for trade. He'd be perfect, even at his age.Crosby? I would say he has it in spades.
Ya, I am probably right up there with you. As great of a story as it would be with Chabot playing well, there just isn't a spot for him anymore, even at 50% retained.I am probably biggest Karlsson fan ever.
He is not the guy to get anymore. I love you, EK, but that ship has sailed. Fair well, dear captain.
Ya, I pushed the idea for a bit too, or at least tried to argue there was some merit to the idea, but the whole idea was predicated on a Chabot for Karlsson swap, which at this point would be ridiculous with the way Chabot is playing.Ya, I am probably right up there with you. As great of a story as it would be with Chabot playing well, there just isn't a spot for him anymore, even at 50% retained.
Dreger today in the pre-game show said he expects Nashville to be buyers after Thanksgiving/trade deadline as they have a lot of draft capital and prospect pool. From what I've read, they seem to have too many shooters, not enough playmakers or players who can get them the puck.Doubt it. Preds already have 3 firsts and 2 seconds next year - they're in win now(ish) mode with those signings. They need to improve their bottom 6 fwds and bottom 3 D in a bad way (Lauzon getting top 4 minutes is not a recipe for success), plus Sissons and Novak are hurt so they are weak down the middle. If anything, Trotz is likely to be the one dealing draft picks this year despite him stating he'll let the young guys play. The Sens could likely cash in on that if they wanted to, but to what benefit?
It would have to be unprotected as it would mean that we're giving up the 2026 1st rounder.I doubt they will but, IF the Islanders decide to blow it up
To Ottawa:
Mat Barzal
To Islanders
2025 1st
Greig
Although I dunno what the rules would be with trading a 1st given the league penalty on us.
Yeah, that's what I think too. If he'd do a Spezza deal and sign here for minimum. Imagine Alfie being one of his coaches. Then they could retire his jersey once he retires. Or maybe they do what they did with Alfie, sign him to one day contract when he retires. I think he'll be a HHOFamer with his 3 Norris trophies. The only way he isn't is if you can't get in unless you've won a championships (SC or Olympics gold).Don't see how we can make Karlsson work anytime soon. Maybe if there's a good chunk of retention in the summer of 2027 or he gets bought out and we sign him for cheap as a UFA.
Seems about right. Trotz is not going to be okay being last!Dreger today in the pre-game show said he expects Nashville to be buyers after Thanksgiving/trade deadline as they have a lot of draft capital and prospect pool. From what I've read, they seem to have too many shooters, not enough playmakers or players who can get them the puck.