Sens of Anarchy
Registered User
- Jul 9, 2013
- 67,141
- 52,860
Big boy. Built like Larry Robinson.Is the camera angle kinda weird in that shot or is Tyler Kleven an absolute f***ing monster?
Big boy. Built like Larry Robinson.Is the camera angle kinda weird in that shot or is Tyler Kleven an absolute f***ing monster?
Bingo.
That’s the good news I was alluding to.
Saw some of the designs for the upcoming season and he is part of the marketing.
Time to forget about him as Sens fans was a year agoAnything on Formenton?
Time to forget about him as Sens fans was a year ago
Will be really important to have a strong front office that has talented individuals to really navigate the next few years. The Sens are setup well with the cap exploding so its important to take advantage.I hope bath isn’t suspended.
A real underrated element of our team next year is even if you give sanderson 8 and pinto signs for 2 that still leaves 11M in cap space with not many holes on the roster to fill. We could easily sign a nice 7-9M short term deal with a UFA. And the UFAs next year is pretty deep. Scheiffle may be the 4-7th best player available.
A semi vet who doesn’t mind playing in ottawa for 2-3 years if we make some noise?
Another year of development for greig, Kleven, I like boucher so a healthy league.
Maybe JBD makes Zub expendable and who doesn’t want a RHD? Save another 4M.
Honestly, not signing cat may be for the best. That first is a nice pick to watch how boston begins their season.
With Brady leading the team I think it’s important that players stand up for themselves. He is an irritant and drags the team to the fight by sticking up for you. But he demands you do as well. I like it. It’s one of many “winners attitude” types. I didn’t get the vibe cat wanted to do that. I saw the fight and everything. I also just saw him manhandled sometimes or smoked on a hit.
I think he will do better in detroit. Bergren looks good. Similar player. I could see some Kane-Cat chemistry reigniting. And maybe Kane does to play there too now! But then you ship out Bergren maybe. That’s gonna need a strong D to make up for it.
I think Sebrango is gonna be a beast too. Ottawa does well with skating on players. Stone. Kaestalic, Batherson, let’s see with Sokolov.
Sebrango has some Twitter videos and hits are awesome. Him and Kleven. Bottom pair. Lots of lefts but he’d be a great and valuable piece.
Earth will almost assuredly be destroyed at some point. Well not almost it definitely will beNo, just comparing highly unlikely events
but will it be in 3 seasons...Earth will almost assuredly be destroyed at some point. Well not almost it definitely will be
Banner is pretty small I mean we had our old logo on shit forever lol.Featured on the 2023-24 season tickets banner right above his post so I assume that's what he referenced
No likely not. But it is likely to happenbut will it be in 3 seasons...
Planet earth needs a rebuildbut will it be in 3 seasons...
I really liked the Imama addition for Belleville but I’m a little surprised to see the team seemingly seeing him on the NHL roster.
Would be surprising to see Imama and MacEwen on the roster at the same time.
I thought we could waive Joseph and save 1.5 million or close to that? If that's the case, I'd like to keep him and call him up when there are injuries. That way, if he gets picked up on waivers, you're clear of the contract, but if he clears, he's at your disposal. It sucks for him, but it is what it is.Saw something interesting on Twitter.
This guy was proposing trading Kubalik instead of Joseph in order to get under the Cap.
His reasons:
we have to attach a sweetner with Joseph, whereas trading Kubalik, we get back a decent asset
the team has probably bonded with Joseph, they like him and want him around, whereas Kubalik they probably don't know anything about him
yes trading Kubalik hurts our depth, but Joseph is a good PKer and that is more of an area of need for the Sens
In a perfect world, we keep both.
I thought we could waive Joseph and save 1.5 million or close to that? If that's the case, I'd like to keep him and call him up when there are injuries. That way, if he gets picked up on waivers, you're clear of the contract, but if he clears, he's at your disposal. It sucks for him, but it is what it is.
Saw something interesting on Twitter.
This guy was proposing trading Kubalik instead of Joseph in order to get under the Cap.
His reasons:
we have to attach a sweetner with Joseph, whereas trading Kubalik, we get back a decent asset
the team has probably bonded with Joseph, they like him and want him around, whereas Kubalik they probably don't know anything about him
yes trading Kubalik hurts our depth, but Joseph is a good PKer and that is more of an area of need for the Sens
In a perfect world, we keep both.
People keep on using that word (gaslighting). I do not think it means what they think it means.I don't really understand how that is gaslighting; it looks like textbook Sens Fan Syndrome to me.
That's not much of a solution if it makes the on ice product worse.We'd save 1.1M burying him, but would then need to replace him on the roster with a cheaper and worse forward, so we'd probably only save 0.3-0.4M doing that.
An easy solution to our cap issues would have been signing Caleb Jones for 0.775M and dealing Brannstrom's 2M cap hit.
Dumping Joseph at the cost of a quality pick would be dumb.
1. I think we need a sweetener to dump Joseph. As good as some people think he is he showed a lot of warts last year. And you didn't have to look to hard. If he stays we need him to be a lot better. (all tools). I question if he has it in him to be a consistent contributor on a 3rd line .
2. I think Brannstrom has earned everything he's gotten here. I think if we are not quite ready to move on from him we are very close with Kleven. Lets see how he does at training camp. I do not see any team giving up more than a 2nd for Brannstrom. A 2nd is what it could take to move Joseph. I am ok with less if that happens,
3. It would be a bold move to package these guys and somehow get Laughton in the lineup. I'd be all for that if we can move a B prospect and keep that 1st. Out Brannstrom, Joseph.. In Kleven, Laughton is a win for me. We lose something (depth and versatility on D) with Brannstrom but gain that at F in Laughton.
People keep on using that word (gaslighting). I do not think it means what they think it means.
OK, I misinterpreted the comment to be more about how his expected usage should be.Absolutely it’s expected. Never claimed otherwise but when drawing attention to his +/- it’s important context. I’d argue that Ottawa’s third pair last year was more sheltered that most but that’s a different conversation.
Saw something interesting on Twitter.
This guy was proposing trading Kubalik instead of Joseph in order to get under the Cap.
His reasons:
we have to attach a sweetner with Joseph, whereas trading Kubalik, we get back a decent asset
the team has probably bonded with Joseph, they like him and want him around, whereas Kubalik they probably don't know anything about him
yes trading Kubalik hurts our depth, but Joseph is a good PKer and that is more of an area of need for the Sens
In a perfect world, we keep both.
Boko Imama is jacked too. Goodness, he's built like a brick shithouse.
That's not much of a solution if it makes the on ice product worse.