I agree with this. I just don't think he makes us a top cup contender and not worth two firsts. The entertainment value would be great no doubt.Sure, but at what level does that turn into JR 2.0 with us throwing dumb amounts of assets at players that don’t really have any way of improving things?
I’d like EK from an entertainment standpoint but I in no way believe he’s going to make our coach and our mediocre roster into a contender.
I think DeAngelo loses value around the league because of his reputation with his personality, more than anything hockey related.Not sure if that’s good or bad for us. Deangelo having pretty low value even at 50% might be at least a barometer for Karlsson’s value even though they’re not entirely comparable. On the other hand, it’s also a barometer for just how low Petry’s value could be too.
And with so much retention it doesn’t necessarily take Carolina out of the running for Karlsson.
At least if this is true they are valuing the defensemen correctly now..Not sure if that’s good or bad for us. Deangelo having pretty low value even at 50% might be at least a barometer for Karlsson’s value even though they’re not entirely comparable. On the other hand, it’s also a barometer for just how low Petry’s value could be too.
And with so much retention it doesn’t necessarily take Carolina out of the running for Karlsson.
Yeah he basically has his own limited movement clause with his behavior lol. He wouldn’t work in like the Seattle or Vancouver markets, has already flamed out of NY and I don’t see a guy like Dubas being interested in him even for free.I think DeAngelo loses value around the league because of his reputation with his personality, more than anything hockey related.
He was a +30 in Carolina before. Defense wasn't a problem. And he had 51 points in 64 games.
That's a Karlsson level stat line with much better defense at 2.5M lol.
I was scalding the board, if that counts for anything.
You decide if it's valid.
I dunno Emp, what is losing in 4 games gonna do for us besides make a few schmucks in Boston a few bonuses?
Karlsson sucks so bad at D, he should come here we will somehow "survive".TDA is just a worse version of Karlsson who happens to also be a psychotic bigot. -edit- They're both neck and neck for the worst defensive defenseman in the league, just absolutely, unequivocally hot trash in their own zone.
f*** TDA.
Do you want the supposed trade details?You know, I cannot get on twitter anymore. Such a shame...
I was scolding people for praising the guy for attempting to make a trade because Hextall wouldn’t.Weren't you scolding the board earlier for comparing Dubas to past GM's?
Signing anyone else or atleast Jarry one 1 yr contract. So when Jarry stinks again this year an causes us to miss the playoffs the Pens are stuck with him.what was the better option?
I honestly believe you could win the Cup with exclusively 30+ y/o's on the roster, especially now with where sports science is at.
But they have to be carefully chosen, with all the roles accounted for and play commensurate to their cap hit. Can't tie yourself up to ridiculous long term deals at fat AAV's for short term returns. You get those sneaky upside vets at near league minimum, and you get equivalent output to many ELC's.
I thought Sid was magnificent 2-way in 2018-19 at 31. That's the hardest I can remember him busting his ass for a season. That was not a great team around him at all. What a waste!
Malkin in 2019-20 after that summer training when he got totally ripped...the best 5v5 producer in the league at 32.
Letang was brilliant the previous 2 seasons at 33-35.
It just has to line up. Look at what we just got from Zucker at 30.
Acquisitions like Smith at ages 32 and 33 will surely be better than many good 25 year olds.
Do you want the supposed trade details?
To CAR: TDA at 50%I saw them, I think. But sure.
Well wth? How'd Broz look?Rizzo actually a baller every time I saw Broz