I can see the argument for either. Trouba had a pretty lousy playoffs all things considered for his $8m. Other than KO’ing two guys he was actually relatively mediocre. And we have guys who can do what he does RELATIVELY soon in our pipeline in spades.
Kreider is both more unique, less expensive, a long time favorite, we have less depth at forward in our prospect pool, etc, but what depth we do have is at LW and his inability to play RW and the fanbase’s complete reluctance to consider pairing with him anyone but Zibanejad so that Lafreniere can benefit is annoying. He would (could) also return way more in trade coming off a 50 goal season (that he likely won’t replicate) with term. The haul could be enticing.
Chris Kreider is a career underachiever and one season hasn’t changed a damn thing. I’m tired of the guy being on our top line all the time frankly, I want elite talent there and he’s not it and has never been it.
He’s a nice player…. If he could finally be relegated to the middle six where he belongs on a truly elite team.
HFboards Rangers forum, the only place on earth where a career 25 goal scorer is a complete untouchable simply because he has tenure.