Empoleon8771
Registered User
That Lizotte deal definitely suggests he'll be a regular. I figure something else has to be coming with their depth forwards, namely Eller and/or Acciari.
Wait wait wait, a much better use of our time is go through draft by draft and looking at all they players they COULD have draft and then bemoaning the fac they didn't!
That Lizotte deal definitely suggests he'll be a regular. I figure something else has to be coming with their depth forwards, namely Eller and/or Acciari.
I can't see anyone clamoring for Acciari another two years. Dude's a total nothingburger.That Lizotte deal definitely suggests he'll be a regular. I figure something else has to be coming with their depth forwards, namely Eller and/or Acciari.
I mean. Hea no world better, but surely he'd have a lineup spot? Figured as much as soon as I saw "multi-year deal"That Lizotte deal definitely suggests he'll be a regular. I figure something else has to be coming with their depth forwards, namely Eller and/or Acciari.
NopeYou forgot "the Penguins chipped in and got him a lawnmower, leaf blower, and weedeater".
What's the cap hit if we put him to WBS?I can't see anyone clamoring for Acciari another two years. Dude's a total nothingburger.
We have Graves' and Letang's contract term extending out long so they can pass on their knowledge to young defenseman so we don't need Petts around. I mean when defenseman asks about Sullivan's defensive prowess/system, they both should be able to answer, "There isn't any so don't worry about it, there isn't any thing to learn".
I think we'll have Graves, Jarry and Rakell around for awhile. I have my doubts on Rust being movable too.
This is the problem with the generationals. You tell yourselves it's okay if you suck in year 1, but then in year 1 that player looks great and everyone panics and says, 'he's so good, you're failing him if you don't surround him with talent!' So now you're forced to move a year or two too fast.Very interesting off-season for them. I would have thought they would have waited an additional year or two before trying to pull out of the gutter but they committed some real money and real term to decent players. Add what they have to Bedard and Levshunov and it will be interesting to see what they come up with.
I mean. Hea no world better, but surely he'd have a lineup spot? Figured as much as soon as I saw "multi-year deal"
I wasn't sure if he was being brought in as a 13th forward or as a regular. The money makes me think he's a regular.
I think he's the obvious Eller replacement when Eller gets moved. But before then, I'm curious about how the bottom-6 shakes up.
Assuming DOC is on the first line, this is what we seem to have in the bottom-6:
Beau/Poulin/Gruden - Lizotte - Puusty/Poolparty
Beau/Poulin/Gruden - Hayes - Acciari
Eller
Which is why getting him when they did in the state that they did is tough. In 2008 when the Pens went to the Cup, they had a solid team built and Sid and Geno were on their ELCs. The next year, when they won, Malkin was on his ELC. So I think there's definitely a positive to wanting to take advantage of his ELC value but at the same time, I don't think you can build a solid cup contender in 1-2 off-seasons through the FA market.This is the problem with the generationals. You tell yourselves it's okay if you suck in year 1, but then in year 1 that player looks great and everyone panics and says, 'he's so good, you're failing him if you don't surround him with talent!' So now you're forced to move a year or two too fast.
It was obvious he didn't. His camp had a high number that didn't make sense for the Penguins cap structure from the start, then the negotiations seemed very tense and stopped. It's not new for players to price themselves off to avoid the negative backlash of stating outright they want to test the market or request a trade. I don't hate any player that does that personally - it's their livelihood and if they are happy elsewhere, good for them.Are we sure Jake even wanted to re-sign here?
Seems pretty obvious he went to the market that he could make the most money in possible.
I laugh when they say multi year and it's always like 2yrs. Say f***ing two years. Multi years is when you have more than a couple of years. Makes everyone feel like it's some 5 year deal.
Illegal emoji, five yard penalty, it is still second down.
Why would VGK? They walked from Marchessault as well.Little annoying we had to retain a bit on Smith. I know he hurt his value this year, but I do really think he could look good, just somewhere else. Really surprised VGK didn't just try to get him back.
Beauvillier is good value.
Hayes trade is fine.
Grzelcyk is pretty good value.
Annoying that we lost POJ for nothing. He didn't live up to potential, but we may as well have got rid of him way earlier and get something for him.
Please don't trade Jarry. Please do trade Graves.
It was a success for VGK. Reports were Smith had no desire to be on the Pens. Maybe that's why his play was not great. Not sure if NYR will work out for him, but he was definitely good for VGK.Why would VGK? They walked from Marchessault as well.
The rest, bless your soul mate. You're being positive and I don't want to ruin that for you.