Toggle sidebar

Fox or Faber

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Fox or Faber

  • Total voters
    104
Raccoon Jesus said:
I think Fox gets a bit of a bum rap, and the tournament certainly isn't helping but

If you're seriously asking me if I'd want to build around a 27 year old or a 22 year old it's a pretty easy choice even before considering how Faber constantly rises to the occasion and learns and grows...he's a sponge...
Click to expand...
Age isn't even a factor because this is like choosing between Eichel and Lafreniere.
 
It’s ok guys, the advanced stats guys know more than the rest of us. And also they know more than Guerin, Sullivan, Torts, and the countless other legendary figures involved in US Hockey who rode Faber like a rented mule against McDavid & MacKinnon.

Their charts say Fox is the East Coast Makar/Hughes - we must be baboons if we don’t agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass
In his first game back, Faber played over 30:00 minutes. I would not trade Faber straight up for Fox, but that is taking into account age, and contracts.

I don't watch enough Fox to have an opinion besides the fact that i think Faber is better compared to McAvoy. Ultimately, I think Faber will end up as lesser offensive, and better defensive player than Fox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus
Raccoon Jesus said:
disagree, 5 years is an eternity in sports

Especially if we're talking about building a team
Click to expand...
Five years of what tho?

He'll never be as good as Fox. He's the third-best defenseman on the Wild.

If it were Sanderson or maybe even Hutson, I would agree with you on the age thing if the question is "build a team around."

I don't get Faber. His underlying numbers are completely f***ing mid. And everyone's gonna call me a nerd and say I don't watch the games. That's fine. This feels like Rasmus Ristolainen all over again. Everyone will get excited about the player, attack me when I point out the numbers, and then forget I told them so when the guy is a nobody at 27.

The only reason Faber gets so much glaze is because his coaches really like putting him on the ice. You know, like Rasmus Ristolainen.
 
Machinehead said:
Five years of what tho?

He'll never be as good as Fox. He's the third-best defenseman on the Wild.

If it were Sanderson or maybe even Hutson, I would agree with you on the age thing if the question is "build a team around."

I don't get Faber. His underlying numbers are completely f***ing mid. And everyone's gonna call me a nerd and say I don't watch the games. That's fine. This feels like Rasmus Ristolainen all over again. Everyone will get excited about the player, attack me when I point out the numbers, and then forget I told them so when the guy is a nobody at 27.

The only reason Faber gets so much glaze is because his coaches really like putting him on the ice. You know, like Rasmus Ristolainen.
Click to expand...
Horrible player comp. If anything, he is like Doughty who has also had questionable advanced stats. Or McAvoy.

And every single Wild fan, coach, player, FO member would confirm he is a better player than both Brodin & Spurgeon.
 
MNRube said:
Horrible player comp. If anything, he is like Doughty who has also had questionable advanced stats. Or McAvoy.

And every single Wild fan, coach, player, FO member would confirm he is a better player than both Brodin & Spurgeon.
Click to expand...
When did Doughty and McAvoy have questionable advanced stats?

Here's all three of them in D+4:

download (9).png


download (10).png


download (11).png


BTW that's the year Drew Doughty won a Stanley Cup and he had already been a Norris finalist.

I understand that Faber is a young player but everyone he's getting compared to in this thread was already a superstar at the age he is now.
 
Phrasing said:
Hughes too.
Click to expand...
Oh, by far.

Werenski, Morrissey, McAvoy, Forsling who everyone just forgot about because it didn't happen yesterday; he's having a good year.

Just scratching the surface here.

Look, I don't wanna sit here and just shit on this kid. He's 22 years old and clearly has some talent. He has the chance to really be something. I just think we're forgetting the caliber of players we're comparing him to here.

Fox, again, already won a Norris at that age and he really should have two. I understand how special Karlsson's production was in 22-23 but Fox was surely a better a hockey player top to bottom. That's a difficult resume to surmount even with all the potential in the world.

Classic HF being reactionary over a few games that just happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phrasing
Machinehead said:
I understand that Faber is a young player but everyone he's getting compared to in this thread was already a superstar at the age he is now.
Click to expand...
The only ones who dont think he is a star is you and the chart crowd. Watch him every night and he’s significantly better than advanced stats darling Spurgeon, to name one example.
 
Machinehead said:
Oh, by far.

Werenski, Morrissey, McAvoy, Forsling who everyone just forgot about because it didn't happen yesterday; he's having a good year.

Just scratching the surface here.

Look, I don't wanna sit here and just shit on this kid. He's 22 years old and clearly has some talent. He has the chance to really be something. I just think we're forgetting the caliber of players we're comparing him to here.

Fox, again, already won a Norris at that age and he really should have two. I understand how special Karlsson's production was in 22-23 but Fox was surely a better a hockey player top to bottom. That's a difficult resume to surmount even with all the potential in the world.

Classic HF being reactionary over a few games that just happened.
Click to expand...
Good lord. Didn’t I just say Faber has been a stud since the moment he made his debut? Stop being an East coast shit head, my dude.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Regal
ref19 said:
Nope. Let’s be serious here


Questionable. Hughes is better on the PP
Click to expand...
It’s not questionable, but my early prognosis is correct, you can’t be reasoned with. Unsure if you are an actual hockey fan if you have this little knowledge. Objectively speaking Faber isn’t top 3. Fox and Hughes are better.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ref19
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom