A few observations on last night's game, which was very entertaining and well-played (exceeding my expectations):
I'd be inclined to give Hill the start on Saturday night vs. the U.S. I thought Binnington looked a little shaky.
Cooper seemed to shorten the bench a bit in the 3rd, playing Point with Hagel and Cirelli. Didn't see much of Jarvis, Konecny or Marchand. With respect to the bottom-6, I thought Jarvis, Marchand and Hagel all had very strong games. Point as well. Konecny looked like he was trying too hard to impact the game. Cirelli looked overmatched. Bennett should draw-in for the U.S. game. I'd sit Cirelli, but it'll likely end up being Konecny. I personally think Konecny has more upside on this team if he can find his groove, but Cooper is likely to go with his TB player. Let's see how it goes.
McDavid needs some puck retrieval on that 1st line. Him and Marner don't seem to mesh. I'd move up Hagel and get Reinhart back on his right side at RW. Leave the 2nd and 3rd lines intact. Marner drops down to the 4th line, and drives offense on that line. Cooper will likely play his 4th line more so than Babcock did (probably for a variety of reasons), so Marner shouldn't receive significantly less ice time than he would playing with McDavid. I'd do this:
Hagel - McDavid - Reinhart
Crosby - MacKinnon - Stone
Marchand - Point - Jarvis
Konecny - Bennett - Marner
Really unfortunate about Theodore. I think that's a significant loss for Team Canada. Sanheim is a good d-man, but it'll be interesting to see how the forwards adapt to one less elite PMD on the back-end. Doughty is looking his age, unfortunately. And we need a little more on Makar, who seems deferential to the big starts up-front (that's my take anyway).
There are two big holes in this team, relative to prior best-on-best Canadian teams:
(1) Canada is relatively weak on faceoffs. The 3rd Swedish goal was a direct result of a faceoff loss by Cirelli (on his weak side) then a defensive breakdown. Yes, hard to avoid having that line (and centre) out there after an icing, but its a pervasive issue. Cirelli, our supposed shutdown centre, is right around 50% on the dot this year (and under 40% for his career), so he's not a guy we're going to want out there taking critical faceoffs in the d-zone while protecting a lead. Crosby is elite on the faceoff dot, but gone are the days when we had Toews and Bergeron, two players who hovered in the high-50%/60% range during their careers, in the faceoff dot. We should have taken Robert Thomas (RHS, 56% this year for exactly this reason.
(2) We lack size on D and at forward. Hagel, Konecny, Marchand, Jarvis, and Cirelli are excellent forecheckers, but they're certainly not big, nor intimidating physically. It seemed like other than the first half of the 1st period, Canada wasn't able to sustain pressure on the forecheck and cycle and any chances that were created were done so out of pure skill and talent. Too late to change that now obviously, but certainly a point for consideration for 2026.