GDT: Four Nations Face-Off II - NO Politics!

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sweeney's defensemen philosophy showing on team Canada tonight. Makar goes out and Morrissey is their only natural puck mover (at this caliber of player). Harley was the next best and wasn't even a roster selection.
Bad goal by Binnington.
But the problem is Canada scored one. One goal. Can't win against a well balance US team with one goal.
 
That was a great game. It had 1st round of the playoff health and desperation combined with all-star talent.

USA Defense and goaltending is on another level from any other nation IMO. As a Canadian, I was quietly cheering for McAvoy. I actually think he played one of the biggest roles in turning momentum. Lighting up McDavid made my day. Again, why you don't trade 26/27 year old defenseman hitting a wall for the first time in his career after several successful seasons as a #1D and Norris candidate.

From the Canada side. Some interesting selections. That's all I have to say.
 
Sweeney's defensemen philosophy showing on team Canada tonight. Makar goes out and Morrissey is their only natural puck mover (at this caliber of player). Harley was the next best and wasn't even a roster selection.
He also lost another puck mover in Theodore. Not really sure how you plan for losing Makar and Theodore in back to back games when building a national team.

The job is a joke tbh, I think people are way too concerned about Sweeney’s “building” of Team Canada. It’s mostly obvious superstars and some popularity contest choices, the few players on the fence aren’t gonna make or break them. Anyone could have picked this team.

They have average goaltending and like a lot of superstar national teams the guys don’t seem to know how to play together yet or haven’t figured out who defers to who.
 
McAvoy got McDavid 2×
This is how he played G5 Panthers last year. Those are his two best games in the last 60 games he has played.

I was going to say why doesn't Charlie play like this all the time??? :dunno:
I would be fine with 20 games against top teams a year like this, but no one can do it all the time.
 
Bad goal by Binnington.
But the problem is Canada scored one. One goal. Can't win against a well balance US team with one goal.
Can't win without transitioning defense to offense. MacKinnon, McDavid, Marner are the best in the world with speed through the neutral zone but they weren't receiving anything
 
  • Like
Reactions: KWbruin
Can't win without transitioning defense to offense. MacKinnon, McDavid, Marner are the best in the world with speed through the neutral zone but they weren't receiving anything
I agree with you.
But....
Marner IMO was bad, especially on the empty netter.
Crosby with either 29 or 97 is not efficient.

But that does not change the fact, that they score one goal. Not on Binington.
 
Even better play by Boldy. Real quick transition by him off the turnover.
Was a nice pass by Boldy but that was a nice shot by Larkin. I wasn't happy they relegated Larkin to L4. Glad to seem him on L3. Maybe send a message to Matthews and either put Hughes at Center and Matthews to Wing. Larkin
is such an underrated hockey player. Has wheels and I wouldn't have an issue
with dropping Matthews down and elevating Larkin.
 
Sweeney's defensemen philosophy showing on team Canada tonight. Makar goes out and Morrissey is their only natural puck mover (at this caliber of player). Harley was the next best and wasn't even a roster selection.

I mean, their original plan was two guys who could move the puck (Makar, Theodore) paired up with their NHL teammates. By game two, 3 of those 4 are not available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff
Not even remotely surprised these three morons pre planned their fights.
I think its brilliant.....Completely got everyone focused on the task at hand

Hughes was more noticeable than Matthews and Matthews is his center, dragging him down. I would flip them or elevate Larkin. Matthews sucked worse than any Bruins PO game.
I was saying that during the Finland game.....If you're gonna play Hughes and Matthews together, Hughes should be C and Matthews should play on the wing.
 
Did really need to do much
He made some key stops. Bennett came in in a 2 on1 and he made important stops in close like when Crosby kept chopping him after. To me it should have been

1) Hellebuyck
2) Larkin
3) McAvoy or Slavin.

yeah Guentzel scored two with one an empty bet, but those three were the most impactful for the US.
 
Canada has 2 right shots with McDavid and not the right one in my humble opinion.Hyman should have been there.He brings sandpaper in front with good hands.Then give him that LH option.How many times we see him set up Draisaitl? .A Tom Wilson would be huge to because he would be throwing heavy heavy hits on the opponents D men + can pot a few.This is not excuses either, I just think the powers that be made some mistakes for Canada.Anyhow they still have alot of great players & lost to a fantastic team.Thats hockey.
 
Tell McDavid to shoot the puck and get more traffic in front of the net. And give Marchand more time. Can’t hurt. Doughety was strong on D.

We need a better goalie too
Try will work the Finland D over if time. It will be 6-1 like US\Finland. Still the favorites to me. I am glad Finland won so its a meaningful game for Finland.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TP70BruinsCup

It kills Canada that the US challenges them for a Championship. Use to be Soviets\Russia was all they cared about and US for good reason was the little brother. So every 8-10 years US puts together a team capable of edging Canada
in a best-on-best game.

Still expect a Canadian win by no AP and Theodore are big losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TP70BruinsCup
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad