GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,831
- 44,559
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
I too, thought that may have been one of his better games. Seemed more aggressive than what I’d seen for the most part. He definitely needs to be jumping up in the play and play less tentative to be effective.
A legend in his own mind. Most of these guys wind up not living up to the hype they get.Hobey finalist. Didn't even lead his team in points.
Hobey finalist. Didn't even lead his team in points.
Maybe they take into account each teams' developmental abilities.Cutter went from being viewed as a one trick pony to future NHL legend just by changing teams
Can we at least entertain the possibility that keeping the trade request a secret meant nothing and the Flyers rushed into a trade on January 8th, with 18-20 suitors, for a player with development time missed/spoiled, attaching themselves to the superficiality of a former 6th overall RHD profile at the advice of Bob Murray?
(I'm still very okay with Drysdale's season getting a mulligan. But the risk-reward was always misconstrued at both ends and the narratives story hour.)
Adding talent for their deep playoff run.
Didn’t they hype the fact that they got ”already established” player?You won't convince me the idea of adding a player this season, for the immediate gratification, didn't factor in.
I mean...Button is kind of a moron. Theres not a chance in hell Gauthier is a better prospect than Michkov.
Michkov has a better chance at scoring 120 points in the NHL than Gauthier has at 80.
You won't convince me the idea of adding a player this season, for the immediate gratification of an over-performing team, didn't factor in.
I think this is one of the most important value trades in recent years, and the process was so horribly terribly botched. For the "Briere has done so well" people, this was the major trade so far with any difficulty setting beyond Easy or Normal.
You have think they saw a bump for the PP as a big plus. Pretty sure the PP got worse.
You won't convince me the idea of adding a player this season, for the immediate gratification of an over-performing team, didn't factor in.
I think this is one of the most important value trades in recent years, and the process was so horribly terribly botched. For the "Briere has done so well" people, this was the major trade so far with any difficulty setting beyond Easy or Normal.
The playmaking element he displayed his first couple weeks totally evaporating is what I want answers to......he devolved into Radko Gudas with his shot selection. Except Radko is less passive activating.
Visually, pre-injury, he pretty clearly looked like the most dynamic PP presence up top. The PP is so grossly mismanaged, I'm in write-off territory, besides prior evaluations.
I said this with York every time pre and post-draft: I never saw PP1 QB skills. My threshold is very very high. And he's underperformed my conservative offensive projections, if anything! Drysdale has more weapons. Is he a PP1 guy? He'll get every opportunity, so there's that.
reminds me more of the Jedi council and we know how that turned outThe fact that people think Briere is doing well is a testament to how intensely awful the failson Fletcher was.
Nonetheless it was a committee. They kept the committee.
It's not a mystery. Flyers get an offensively minded dman and they feel the need to teach them old fashioned defense. The way it has always been. It's a deep seated need
You won't convince me the idea of adding a player this season, for the immediate gratification of an over-performing team, didn't factor in.
I think this is one of the most important value trades in recent years, and the process was so horribly terribly botched. For the "Briere has done so well" people, this was the major trade so far with any difficulty setting beyond Easy or Normal.
I agree with you with past cases, but in this instance, they gave a young offensive minded player a long leash with set-in-stone usage independent of results, didn't overly harp on the defense (as he was often burned), and hyped him as a rover. I'd love to rip the team, but I don't think they did nothing wrong with Drysdale in his 21 games. Hell, I applaud them for it. But I think it's a shiny new outlier based on how much they invested in him. The thing with Drysdale is he actually needs to showcase his offense.
Injuries don't necessarily define a player but you would imagine after the Nolan Patrick and Ryan Ellis injury sagas the Flyers would be a bit more cautious about trading for a player that already missed a season due to an injury. Not the same injuries at all but sheesh.
Just looking at Cutter's raw point totals it looks like he finished his college season strong. Where was the potential upside for this trade for the Flyers? Nowhere that I can tell.
imagine what this board would post EVERY day if we traded Drysdale after this season for someone like cutter. They would build a stature for Briere already! Twitter would never stop salivating over this trade!You won't convince me the idea of adding a player this season, for the immediate gratification of an over-performing team, didn't factor in.
I think this is one of the most important value trades in recent years, and the process was so horribly terribly botched. For the "Briere has done so well" people, this was the major trade so far with any difficulty setting beyond Easy or Normal.