HTFN
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2009
- 12,186
- 10,733
That had better be the payoff or I'll be a little irritated, that's still just a crazy review process and not even particularly conclusive.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerThat had better be the payoff or I'll be a little irritated, that's still just a crazy review process and not even particularly conclusive.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
I wouldn't mind seeing Lindgren try for a goal.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
Definitely not, that's literally never been the way they call it until tonight. Carlson has had 2 of those taken from him.Looks like they got the call right in the end
OV EN please
I still remember the "goaltender interference" in...'08? against these Flyers where a defender just fully shoved a Cap into the goalie and that was enough, and then the Caps also getting f***ed on the same call for the next 5+ years every single timeDefinitely not, that's literally never been the way they call it until tonight. Carlson has had 2 of those taken from him.
Protas is a beast!!
They contradict themselves in the same game sometimes, it's insane. They need to just make the rule any contact with the goaltender before the puck crosses the line negates a goal, unless he initiates it or the player is pushed in. All ambiguity needs to go away.I still remember the "goaltender interference" in...'08? against these Flyers where a defender just fully shoved a Cap into the goalie and that was enough, and then the Caps also getting f***ed on the same call for the next 5+ years every single time
par for the course