HTFN
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2009
- 12,165
- 10,686
That had better be the payoff or I'll be a little irritated, that's still just a crazy review process and not even particularly conclusive.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
That had better be the payoff or I'll be a little irritated, that's still just a crazy review process and not even particularly conclusive.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
I wouldn't mind seeing Lindgren try for a goal.Even better. Hopefully an Ovie ENG now.
Definitely not, that's literally never been the way they call it until tonight. Carlson has had 2 of those taken from him.Looks like they got the call right in the end
OV EN please
I still remember the "goaltender interference" in...'08? against these Flyers where a defender just fully shoved a Cap into the goalie and that was enough, and then the Caps also getting f***ed on the same call for the next 5+ years every single timeDefinitely not, that's literally never been the way they call it until tonight. Carlson has had 2 of those taken from him.
Protas is a beast!!
They contradict themselves in the same game sometimes, it's insane. They need to just make the rule any contact with the goaltender before the puck crosses the line negates a goal, unless he initiates it or the player is pushed in. All ambiguity needs to go away.I still remember the "goaltender interference" in...'08? against these Flyers where a defender just fully shoved a Cap into the goalie and that was enough, and then the Caps also getting f***ed on the same call for the next 5+ years every single time
par for the course