LaP
Registered User
It's okay to draft players who project as bottom 6. It's even okay to draft player who project as 4th line. I think there's value in having as many drafted players as you can in your team and have an inflow of ELC coming in during a cup window. Starting in the 4th round it's very rare that a player will become a quality top 6 player. So if you can grab someone who will be a high quality bottom 6 guy you do it.
The problem in the past is this team had the attitude that anyone drafted by it would either need to be the 2nd coming of Guy Lafleur or bust. Better examples of that are Tucker, Beauchemin and even Hainsey (who had a decent career despite everything). Basically if one of our kid was not good enough for the top 6 it was bust and bye bye. Hopefully our new management will have a different attitude toward the kids we draft and will accept them as they are and try to find a role for them.
There's a lot of value in ELC contracts in this league. Either in trade values or in cap management value. As long as we're not afraid to set aside depth vets who are asking for too much and replace them by good kids i think we should target kids who project as quality depth players and develop them as such. He's a project but i think he's an interesting one. Not mad about using a 4th on him. We just need to tamper expectations and let him grow.
The problem in the past is this team had the attitude that anyone drafted by it would either need to be the 2nd coming of Guy Lafleur or bust. Better examples of that are Tucker, Beauchemin and even Hainsey (who had a decent career despite everything). Basically if one of our kid was not good enough for the top 6 it was bust and bye bye. Hopefully our new management will have a different attitude toward the kids we draft and will accept them as they are and try to find a role for them.
There's a lot of value in ELC contracts in this league. Either in trade values or in cap management value. As long as we're not afraid to set aside depth vets who are asking for too much and replace them by good kids i think we should target kids who project as quality depth players and develop them as such. He's a project but i think he's an interesting one. Not mad about using a 4th on him. We just need to tamper expectations and let him grow.
Last edited: