HabbyGuy
Registered User
David Savard would have made no difference. He has lost two steps and isn’t the guy he was last year. My lord, only in Hab land would a 5/6 get anointed into some pillar of defense. What they would have lost 8-2.
We are talking David Savard not Serge Savard, ffs.
How does one reason with these type of ridiculous takes? Noone's calling David, Serge. The fact that you wash out any context of this situation that our D finds itself in just further shows your silly bias.
The team is the youngest D in the league, we had one veteran on the ice last night patroling the blue line. Every Dman last night sans two I think, had to play on their wrong side, due to lack of depth at RHD position.
You may scoff at the idea of calling Savard a "pillar" of defense (which I totally get), but unfortunately for us, with his leadership, experience, and natural RD position, he is by default just that on this green young D. Sad isn't it?
Which just goes to further show you what the coaching staff is having to deal with.
Last edited: