Boom Boom Apathy
I am the Professor. Deal with it!
- Sep 6, 2006
- 50,239
- 113,363
The trend toward individualism is, IMO, driven a lot by employers. Over the past 30 years, they've chipped away at the things that helps keep an employee loyal, only to help their bottom line. Vacation time, medical benefits, retirement benefits, employee stock plans, etc..I wonder how much of this is owing it to the fans and loyalty to the fans rather than to the team.
It is true, it is a two way street, and employers can get rid of employees anytime, regardless of performance. Business needs will trump employee loyalty.
That said, I do think there has been a prevalent move in society towards individualism, and the lack of perseverance or resilience is not what it once was. To stay with an employer (or employee) during lean or difficult times. One may then can ask how long of a difficult time constitutes endless waiting. What if the employee stays and commits through thick and thin, only to have the employer pull the rug out under them.
Those actions have driven employees to be more individualistic, because unlike years ago, the company isn't going to be there for them long term.
I get that sports are different because of the fan involvement so it's more complicated, but I do feel that players need to look out for themselves, because teams will do that. My team did that with Calvin de Hann. Signed him as a UFA and then turned around and traded him for cap reasons a year later. We've also had players do it to the team (Adam Fox refusing to sign, Rantanen not wanting to sign after the trade, etc... I don't hold ill will to the team or players for doing what's best for them.
I Look at NTC/NMC differently. In many cases, it's because the player WANTS to be loyal to the team he signed with, and also have the team be loyal to him. He doesn't want to be traded elsewhere, where he may not want to go, without his permission.Still, the amount of players signing with a team only to dictate NMC / NTC seems to signal the player's desire to commit to himself first rather than show loyalty to the team that wanted them in the first place. But I get it, it's easy to argue one side, but it does take two to tango...
In this case, Brady is telling Ottawa upfront that once this contract is up, he's not re-signing. That's not being disloyal, it's telling them up front so that if Ottawa wants to trade him for some assets, they have time to do it. He could have just done like Tavares and played out the final two seasons in Ottawa and left as a free agent.

