So, they finally traded knight, you say?
View attachment 985116
I’m more surprised that they’d retain 25% with 5yrs remaining on that deal and not even having to give up Samoskevich OR our ‘26 1st rounder. Sounds like we have the freedom to trade that one still if we want to if I’m reading the details correct.
The good thing about jones too over say someone like Karlsson is 1) his age 2) he’s got size and strength 3) can still score goals and produce, helping to fill the void that montour left 4) locked in for another 5yrs at a better cap hit 5) IF Ekblad doesn’t re-sign, we have someone who can feasibly fill his shoes on the top pairing alongside Forsling. I certainly wouldn’t want Karlsson on my 1st pairing. 2nd pairing sure, but we had no backup plan in case we can’t keep Ekblad
I’m very happy with this deal especially given the retention. I still believe, including this upcoming run, that bob has 3-4 more runs in him of solid play and we’ll cross that bridge when we eventually get there. I never liked the idea of shoehorning knight in if bob was still playing at a respectable level. Spend that cap space elsewhere, you’re taking a bigger gamble holding on and hoping he pans out vs moving him, ride bob for several more years, and use the cap space on the roster