I am toxic
. . . even in small doses
Why is Westhead breaking this news? I thought some guy in Montreal was always a step ahead of him? /sarcasm
I said that would be the best thing, not the only thing. There should obviously be imprisonment for a reasonable period of time, but not in any jungle like brutalizing conditions but in our Nordic style civilized circumstances. With actual possibility of rehabilitation.Eye for an eye, is never good. Although the desire for same in heinous cases is indeed understandable and quite human.
That said, the price for such inhumane treatment of another human being should be severe. Far far beyond being required to show real remorse.
There is actually an urban legend over 15-20yrs in Hong Kong(bc I have never seen it and only heard it among friends) that if you get caught getting a prostitute in China, the police will stamp Punter in their passport.If it were my daughter I’d vote 1 then 2 in that order. If they were on fire I wouldn’t waste my piss on them, personally.
They’ve already been radicalized by something so I think that‘s double jeopardy.
That and all the details available. At best, they displayed some pretty deplorable behavior that would have them out of my circles, guilty verdict in court or not.Innocent until proven guilty but it is so hard not to take side with the woman bc everyone post here understands or at least know the hockey culture with teens….
All these kids have been getting away with pretty much everything since they were kids bc they are good at Hockey. Not saying all of them are entitled but it just wouldn’t surprise me if this indeed happened.
They should ask the other three major sports how their teens become such upstanding citizens.at least know the hockey culture with teens…
What might be the fallout if players/management who aren't charged with a crime but testify in court as witnesses and it comes out that they knew of the crimes before, during and/or after the fact, but did nothing to stop the activity nor mitigate the situation in any fashion?
I know there's no legal requirement to be a "Good Samaritan" in a technical sense, but might there be outrage from fan bases against persons for not doing the right thing from a moral perspective? Basically, Player X knew Player Y was engaging in criminal behavior, but Player X did not use any influence to stop Player Y nor reported the incident to anyone.
Will we see any witnesses take the 5th (I know it will be a Canadian case--just using the expression) on the stand to avoid possible legal action either criminal or civil?
Many in the Chicago-Kris Beach situation were punished for knowing about the abuse and refusing to stand up to it and stop it or just ignoring the wrong-doing altogether.
My Best-Carey
Take a look at the thread about Dube requesting a leave of absence, zero talk of 2018 until after the news broke. People keep saying that it was obvious, yet at the time they said nothing.It's definitely a pretty minor sin compared to this whole story, but I'm surprised to see people defending the Flames PR. It seemed so obvious at the time this was likely connected to the London sexual assault innocent. It would have been so easy for the Flames to say "Dube is on leave from the team - we will offer no further comment".
I didn’t say the other cultures are Saints. Or they are better than Hockey Culture.They should ask the other three major sports how their teens become such upstanding citizens.
Take a look at the thread about Dube requesting a leave of absence, zero talk of 2018 until after the news broke. People keep saying that it was obvious, yet at the time they said nothing.
It wasn't until after that it became obvious.
IMO Dube likely told him it was a mental health problem and the Flames took him at his word on it. They didn't ask for specifics because, that's not their business, nor do they have a right to know exactly what is wrong.
We cant' back date what we know just because we now know it was BS.
The thing is, the player you described could be Makar as I believe he was on that team.What might be the fallout if players/management who aren't charged with a crime but testify in court as witnesses and it comes out that they knew of the crimes before, during and/or after the fact, but did nothing to stop the activity nor mitigate the situation in any fashion?
I know there's no legal requirement to be a "Good Samaritan" in a technical sense, but might there be outrage from fan bases against persons for not doing the right thing from a moral perspective? Basically, Player X knew Player Y was engaging in criminal behavior, but Player X did not use any influence to stop Player Y nor reported the incident to anyone.
Will we see any witnesses take the 5th (I know it will be a Canadian case--just using the expression) on the stand to avoid possible legal action either criminal or civil?
Many in the Chicago-Kris Beach situation were punished for knowing about the abuse and refusing to stand up to it and stop it or just ignoring the wrong-doing altogether.
My Best-Carey
No, it was obvious. HFBoards just banned anyone from saying it was connected until 2018 as it was "speculation".Take a look at the thread about Dube requesting a leave of absence, zero talk of 2018 until after the news broke. People keep saying that it was obvious, yet at the time they said nothing.
It wasn't until after that it became obvious.
IMO Dube likely told him it was a mental health problem and the Flames took him at his word on it. They didn't ask for specifics because, that's not their business, nor do they have a right to know exactly what is wrong.
We can't back date what we know just because we now know it was BS.
Take a look at the thread about Dube requesting a leave of absence, zero talk of 2018 until after the news broke. People keep saying that it was obvious, yet at the time they said nothing.
It wasn't until after that it became obvious.
IMO Dube likely told him it was a mental health problem and the Flames took him at his word on it. They didn't ask for specifics because, that's not their business, nor do they have a right to know exactly what is wrong.
We cant' back date what we know just because we now know it was BS.
Keep in mind there was a ban on any speculation... Also keep in mind that that post had an obscene amount of deleted posts.
But for posterity;
We knew. These 5 names have been widely known since 2022 when the civil case and original hockey Canada case came to fruition.
No, it was obvious. HFBoards just banned anyone from saying it was connected until 2018 as it was "speculation".
Have you considered teaming up with an add blocking company? Sell blockers on one hand and show ads to those too cheap to buy one on the other. You'd win the internet.Good luck getting money out of us - too many people using ad blockers these days.
If that's the case why does that thread not have any warning about speculating? I'm not saying you're wrong but I find it odd that the moderators didn't say anything about it, just deleted everything and said nothing and then locked it.No, it was obvious. HFBoards just banned anyone from saying it was connected until 2018 as it was "speculation".
And I mean - it was speculation - just really and obvious speculation.
Have you considered teaming up with an add blocking company? Sell blockers on one hand and show ads to those too cheap to buy one on the other. You'd win the internet.
Well, I must say ad blocker <redacted> has been working great for me.Our secret contract with our ad blocking company prohibits me from...ah, shit.
No, we haven't considered that.
Yah the mods deleted a whole bunch of posts early in that thread of anyone connecting the dots between Dube's LOA and the rape scandal. My post got deleted [mod]Did it have deleted posts before all the other guys started requesting LOA's? I don't remember it, if it did. Even the Reddit post was from a week ago, not 10 days ago when Dube requested the leave of absence.
I could be way off but, I don't remember anyone saying anything about Dube at the time of the leave of absence, it wasn't until the others all started too, that it became clear it was BS
No, it was obvious. HFBoards just banned anyone from saying it was connected until 2018 as it was "speculation".
And I mean - it was speculation - just really and obvious speculation.
When did you connect those dots? Before or after Hart asked too?Yah the mods deleted a whole bunch of posts early in that thread of anyone connecting the dots between Dube's LOA and the rape scandal. My post got deleted
They have this on another forum I'm on. You have to have X amount of posts/"service time" and it's not found in a Google search. They don't charge for it, but it's a smaller board, so less costly to run.in all seriousness, I and I bet many others would be cool with some sort of premium pkg, maybe access to a hidden subforum or something