#FIRECHIA

Status
Not open for further replies.

Soundwave

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
74,165
30,355
Still want him fired if no playoffs. Fair enough. It's not an opinion borne out of one or a handful of games.
 

Chet Manley

Registered User
Apr 15, 2007
3,647
1,827
Regina, SK
IMO Toronto and Calgary rebounded quickly because they had promising young defence setup before their star forwards arrived. Similar to Chicago's rebuild with Keith and Seabrook being in place before acquiring Kane and Toews. Defenceman take longer and having them in place before the high pick forwards works out pretty well. Thankfully Calgary's forwards aren't Kane and Toews type talents and it'll stop them short of getting anywhere in the playoffs. AKA suck it Flames.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,702
64,112
Islands in the stream.
That trade? That team was already a Stanley Cup champion before he got there. Phil Kessel did dick all in Toronto turning them into a competitor. The Penguins gifted him two Stanley Cups, same as Schultzy. I'm not saying the trades didn't help or that the players were non factors, but comparing their situation to ours is apples and oranges.

Also the Richards trade continues to pay dividends for Philadelphia. LA may have the championships, but Philly still has the player(s).



The poster was mentioning that the Kings had obtained Carter and Richards. Carter, you may note, still plays with the Kings.

In anycase I would take the payoff in LA anyday. There never will be payoff in Philly in a badly run org that unloaded Brayden Schenn. The Flyers are a ship of fools. They've unloaded so much talent through the years and never benefit form any of it. What benefit is a player if the team is pathetic.

Kings just curb stomped the Flyers once again just pummeling them tonight.

The Kings being two time cup winners already and among the leaders in a conference. The Flyers are a big bag of nothing.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,623
23,328
Canada
The poster was mentioning that the Kings had obtained Carter and Richards. Carter, you may note, still plays with the Kings.

In anycase I would take the payoff in LA anyday. There never will be payoff in Philly in a badly run org that unloaded Brayden Schenn. The Flyers are a ship of fools. They've unloaded so much talent through the years and never benefit form any of it. What benefit is a player if the team is pathetic.

Kings just curb stomped the Flyers once again just pummeling them tonight.

The Kings being two time cup winners already and among the leaders in a conference. The Flyers are a big bag of nothing.
You're also completely stepping over the point that LA was already an established contender prior to the trades being made with Philly and CBJ. The defense was set, the goaltending was set and their offense just needed the veteran adds to push them over the top. We are in our infancy as a 'contending' hockey team. Getting Connor McDavid didn't suddenly establish us in 2015. Legwork was needed to turn that roster into a well-rounded, financially stable roster.

And again, the Carter trade was an even bigger win for Philly--getting Jake Voracek and Sean Couturier? I'm still talking to the same guys who said we got cleaned out in the Hall trade, right? Philly is laughing with the pieces they got from those trades still. Why? Because 'winning trades' doesn't necessarily equate to winning championships. Winning those requires you to build a well-rounded, competitive hockey team.
 
Last edited:

BigBadBruins7708

Registered User
Dec 11, 2017
14,568
19,987
Las Vegas
Still want him fired if no playoffs. Fair enough. It's not an opinion borne out of one or a handful of games.

yeah, stupid Chia...how do you not have a plan for losing your #1 defenseman and starting goalie.......

I get the angst and all, but can you guys please stop acting like your Oilers have had their complete roster?
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,621
45,515
NYC
much of what your post did is simply offuscate that halfway into his tenure the team is back to where he started from. Except now with far less tradeable assets, far less wingers (players like Hall and Eberle are certainly not easily obtained, you know, except for dealing with guys like Chia in which case he'll fire sale anything that came before him.

If one is actually looking at Chia's body of work to this point theres been more harm than profit to the longterm future of this club.

You say Chia learned something in Boston about his trading but I fail to see what that is. He sold assets on sale in Boston and he's doing tht here.

The devils and Islanders, two teams that were lost in space, now laughing all the way to the bank, and playoffs.

Not only is Chia trading talent, he's trading exciting players that people pay to see. Eberle is among the favorites already in NYI. Hall is absolutely the favorite player in Jersey. So people buying tickets to see improved clubs, and the new faces, and in markets that really needed something positive.

But hey, we got Strome, Jokinen, Camm, Malone, Auvitu, Walker. That's what we get.

That's lumps of coal under the Xmas tree, that's all that is.

Besides the Reinhart deal, which deal in particular has harmed the long term team outlook?

Who cares about exciting? The Oilers needed lineup balance and better defense. McDavid and Drai aren't enough excitement? Puljujarvi? People don't pay to see Eberle, they pay to see McDavid. Furthermore, the Oilers don't need to hoard skilled players to keep a fanbase interested.

I can understand criticizing Chia for losing value in a trade or not addressing needs this offseason but to get on him for dealing players because they were exciting seems like an odd complaint especially considering that the Oilers have the most exciting player in the league.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,621
45,515
NYC
In context why would they? The Hall contract is the best hockey contract in the league as far as production value. Devils got an instant Marquee player and best player on the team and marketable name that sells hockey tickets for 6M. That's an out of the park 4 run homerun.

Up until this season, he basically had 4 straight seasons of Eberle level production so I think you're overstating how good the contract is in relation to his raw production. Hall is having a great season but he hadn't been a marquee player for a long time prior to this season.
FTR, I love watching the Devils play (seen them play in person twice this season), they might be my second favorite team as far as "must watch TV" is concerned so I have no bias against Hall and that team.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,702
64,112
Islands in the stream.
You're also completely stepping over the point that LA was already an established contender prior to the trades being made with Philly and CBJ. The defense was set, the goaltending was set and their offense just needed the veteran adds to push them over the top. We are in our infancy as a 'contending' hockey team. Getting Connor McDavid didn't suddenly establish us in 2015. Legwork was needed to turn that roster into a well-rounded, financially stable roster.

And again, the Carter trade was an even bigger win for Philly--getting Jake Voracek and Sean Couturier? I'm still talking to the same guys who said we got cleaned out in the Hall trade, right? Philly is laughing with the pieces they got from those trades still. Why? Because 'winning trades' doesn't necessarily equate to winning championships. Winning those requires you to build a well-rounded, competitive hockey team.


Good reply, and believe me I get it. LA team was already being build out, just that they needed certain ingredients, and not others. I could get into more complexity on why they didn't need the two players they gave up. But they needed a Jeff Carter, the needed a Richards. I could be off on this but afairc they had also obtained Williams. Those are the types of quantities they required to build from where they were. So I understand the prototype involved, and can go into a lot more depth.

Know as well that I predicted the 2012 LA Kings SC W during the first round of their playoff series with the Vancouver Canucks. I knew that it was coming together at the best moment for that Kings team who had all kinds of confidence, belief, and the ingredients to get it done. I made that prediction on this board, and the LA board. I had an intimate understanding of that team, sometimes it happens.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,702
64,112
Islands in the stream.
Besides the Reinhart deal, which deal in particular has harmed the long term team outlook?

Who cares about exciting? The Oilers needed lineup balance and better defense. McDavid and Drai aren't enough excitement? Puljujarvi? People don't pay to see Eberle, they pay to see McDavid. Furthermore, the Oilers don't need to hoard skilled players to keep a fanbase interested.

I can understand criticizing Chia for losing value in a trade or not addressing needs this offseason but to get on him for dealing players because they were exciting seems like an odd complaint especially considering that the Oilers have the most exciting player in the league.
Fair comment good sir. But STILL, the NHL is an entertainment, and a gate driven league. You missed my point. The Oilers didn't need those entertainers at the gate, selling tickets here is next thing to guaranteed. But DEALING players that just happen to be prolific, productive, entertainers, to teams like Jersey, and NYI, OUGHT to have been able to engage more leverage.

I'm all about the art of the deal. Its not always that you are dealing from a position of weakness. If you're dealing quantities like Hall or Eberle I was just citing that theres more at work than JUST what the players bring on the ice. Some players are entertaining enough to sell tickets to. Both Jersey, and NYI happen to require that more, would love obtaining players like that and did. For them it was win win in so many ways. I wasn't being flippant when I said laughing all the way to the bank.
 

Drivesaitl

Finding Hemingway
Oct 8, 2017
49,702
64,112
Islands in the stream.
Up until this season, he basically had 4 straight seasons of Eberle level production so I think you're overstating how good the contract is in relation to his raw production. Hall is having a great season but he hadn't been a marquee player for a long time prior to this season.
FTR, I love watching the Devils play (seen them play in person twice this season), they might be my second favorite team as far as "must watch TV" is concerned so I have no bias against Hall and that team.

A talent like Hall doesn't forget how to be a PPG player. The talent and ability doesn't typically evaporate. In some cases the competitive juices need to be fully awakened in better situations. But the thing is that better situation could have been here with McD, or Drai, or in Jersey. The Oilers were a team transformed. In effect the team was turning into a competive future that Taylor required to be at his best. Taylor Hall got eventually brought down by endless seasons of non competive hockey here. Because he is a competitor and winner, and spent too long in a situation where the team had no win prospects. But now the team did. That's where we differ.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,621
45,515
NYC
A talent like Hall doesn't forget how to be a PPG player. The talent and ability doesn't typically evaporate. In some cases the competitive juices need to be fully awakened in better situations. But the thing is that better situation could have been here with McD, or Drai, or in Jersey. The Oilers were a team transformed. In effect the team was turning into a competive future that Taylor required to be at his best. Taylor Hall got eventually brought down by endless seasons of non competive hockey here. Because he is a competitor and winner, and spent too long in a situation where the team had no win prospects. But now the team did. That's where we differ.

I agree that the losing got to him, I was just posting in response to you saying that his contract is the best in the league relative to production. It really isn't when you look at his numbers the 4 seasons prior to this one, his production was remarkably similar to Eberle's actually.

He's an elite possession player but he hasn't been an elite scorer for many years up until this season and it's not like he has played with junk linemates. I've always felt like his production didn't match up with his talent outside of those two high level scoring seasons.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,621
45,515
NYC
Fair comment good sir. But STILL, the NHL is an entertainment, and a gate driven league. You missed my point. The Oilers didn't need those entertainers at the gate, selling tickets here is next thing to guaranteed. But DEALING players that just happen to be prolific, productive, entertainers, to teams like Jersey, and NYI, OUGHT to have been able to engage more leverage.

I'm all about the art of the deal. Its not always that you are dealing from a position of weakness. If you're dealing quantities like Hall or Eberle I was just citing that theres more at work than JUST what the players bring on the ice. Some players are entertaining enough to sell tickets to. Both Jersey, and NYI happen to require that more, would love obtaining players like that and did. For them it was win win in so many ways. I wasn't being flippant when I said laughing all the way to the bank.

The thing is that the Devils and Islanders needed those players a lot more than the Oilers did. With Draisaitl taking on a more prominent role and Puljujarvi close to making the NHL jump, it made those players expendable.

It can be argued that Chia should have gotten a pick in addition to Larsson to get Hall but I still feel that the Oilers need a Larsson a lot more than they need a Hall.
The Eberle trade was almost entirely cap driven to free up cap space for the potential Draisaitl offer sheet (as faint as that possibility was) and potential trade deadline acquisitions and I still maintain that Eberle quietly requested a trade. Chia probably figured that the combination of Puljujarvi and Strome would make up for the loss of Eberle's production and to be honest, it's not far off. Still doesn't excuse the lack of value he got in return for Eberle though, no argument there.
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,156
14,275
Might as well add Walker to the list of Chia failures.

Isn't this a little petty?

A waiver wire claim (more than one team wanted him) that was designed to shake up the complacency of the bottom 6.

Seems to have worked.

Are we going to count the Davidson claim as a success then?
 

Pressure

Real Talk
Aug 11, 2005
2,366
42
Edmonton
Let's be real here. We're not making the playoffs. It's not happening. We have to play at a winning % of around 60-65 to get into the wild card...This years team does not have the mental fortitude to do so. They have been playing better, but the hole is much too big to climb out of.

Chia did not address any issues on the fly. He's let a season go down the drain because of it. #firechia
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,156
14,275
Let's be real here. We're not making the playoffs. It's not happening. We have to play at a winning % of around 60-65 to get into the wild card...This years team does not have the mental fortitude to do so. They have been playing better, but the hole is much too big to climb out of.

Chia did not address any issues on the fly. He's let a season go down the drain because of it. #firechia

It's not going to happen. He'll probably get a chance to make a coaching change first. If that doesn't work then maybe the spotlight will turn to him.
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,541
7,037
Besides the Reinhart deal, which deal in particular has harmed the long term team outlook?

Who cares about exciting? The Oilers needed lineup balance and better defense. McDavid and Drai aren't enough excitement? Puljujarvi? People don't pay to see Eberle, they pay to see McDavid. Furthermore, the Oilers don't need to hoard skilled players to keep a fanbase interested.

I can understand criticizing Chia for losing value in a trade or not addressing needs this offseason but to get on him for dealing players because they were exciting seems like an odd complaint especially considering that the Oilers have the most exciting player in the league.
How do the Hall and Eberle trades not harm the Oilers long term? Taylor Hall is the franchise player on a team with a very good shot at making the playoffs and should basically destroy any notion that the dude's a loser or whatever. Adam Larsson is a good player, but not the type of player that can tilt the ice in a way someone like Taylor Hall can, and goes as far as the rest of the team goes. Jordan Eberle is better than Ryan Strome at every aspect of hockey and even in his worst season last year, he still bested Ryan Strome's most productive season. One of the Oilers' main issues has been scoring from our wingers which is why we're rumored to be paying out the *** for Mike Hoffman, a Jordan Eberle level player. You know what would have been easier than acquiring Hoffman? Keeping Eberle. Moreover, even if Taylor Hall and Jordan Eberle weren't in the Oilers long-term plans, trading them for less than what they're worth means we can no longer use them as bargaining chips.

Losing trades to "fill needs" is fine when you're making minor moves, not when moving franchise cornerstone pieces. You never know when a player is going to go down to injury, or a player is going to break out. You trade key wingers for lesser players to fill a need, and all the sudden in 2 years time, you franchise's weakness is scoring off the wing. Heck, like another poster mentioned in this thread, Ryan Rishaug freaking tweeted that the Oilers were about to "lose a trade", and he's an Oilers mouthpiece. Meaning Peter Chiarelli knew exactly what he was doing. Good GMs try go extract as much value as possible out of a trade, Chiarelli caves to everyone's demands. That's the sign of a lazy bum with no negotiating capabilities (see: him getting taken to the shed in the Seguin, Boychuk, Hall, Eberle, Barzal trades, or the Smith, Lucic, Seidenberg, Russell, Draisaitl, and Lucic again contracts).

We talk about Hall and Eberle being part of a losing culture here under the Tambellini/MacTavish regimes. How about the losing culture Chiarelli has cultivated? Not only is our team near the bottom of the standings, despite starting with far more pieces to work with in his first season than Tambo/MacT had during their entire stints. And moreover, he's also established the fact that "the Oilers will cave if you play hardball", and every GM in the league and every agent in the league can see this. So when they negotiate with Chia, they're going to squeeze every ounce of value out of him. He's managed to piss away assets like Hall, Eberle, and Barzal, with only Adam Larsson and Ryan Strome to show for it, and managed to somehow botch the salary cap situation during McDavid's ELC. That's a fireable offense.
 

bobbythebrain

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
14,091
13,926
The poster was mentioning that the Kings had obtained Carter and Richards. Carter, you may note, still plays with the Kings.

In anycase I would take the payoff in LA anyday. There never will be payoff in Philly in a badly run org that unloaded Brayden Schenn. The Flyers are a ship of fools. They've unloaded so much talent through the years and never benefit form any of it. What benefit is a player if the team is pathetic.

Kings just curb stomped the Flyers once again just pummeling them tonight.

The Kings being two time cup winners already and among the leaders in a conference. The Flyers are a big bag of nothing.

You forgot to mention that Philly also traded Vinny Lecalvier and Luke Schenn to LA for a 3rd and Jordan Weal
Now that's how you cap dump properly
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,621
45,515
NYC
How do the Hall and Eberle trades not harm the Oilers long term? Taylor Hall is the franchise player on a team with a very good shot at making the playoffs and should basically destroy any notion that the dude's a loser or whatever. Adam Larsson is a good player, but not the type of player that can tilt the ice in a way someone like Taylor Hall can, and goes as far as the rest of the team goes. Jordan Eberle is better than Ryan Strome at every aspect of hockey and even in his worst season last year, he still bested Ryan Strome's most productive season. One of the Oilers' main issues has been scoring from our wingers which is why we're rumored to be paying out the *** for Mike Hoffman, a Jordan Eberle level player. You know what would have been easier than acquiring Hoffman? Keeping Eberle. Moreover, even if Taylor Hall and Jordan Eberle weren't in the Oilers long-term plans, trading them for less than what they're worth means we can no longer use them as bargaining chips.

The Oilers needed a Larsson more than they needed a Hall. The emergence of Draisaitl made Hall expendable. It might take some time for Drai to anchor his own line as a high level line driver but I have no doubt that he will get there and soon. This is McDavid's team, Hall wouldn't have worked well as a 2nd fiddle, you could already see evidence of that at the end of his tenure here. I'm not going to sit here and say that the trade was fair valuewise but this is not going to be a trade that will hurt them long term. I think this is a case of the need justifying the loss in value.

Eberle? Come on. It can be argued that his presence is slightly missed this season but long term? Nah, they'll be fine without Eberle. Not that I'm happy with the return of Strome, but this is not the franchise crippling move that some are making it out to be. It'll be looked at as hardly a blip on the radar in a couple of years.

I'll reiterate, as I have throughout the thread, that Chia has made some mistakes. The Reinhart trade, too much term on a few contracts, the backup goalie situations, not addressing needs this offseason but the amount of "damage" that some think he has inflicted on the organization is grossly overstated IMO.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad