Boocowski
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2025
- 16
- 19
Oh ffs. Okay Mr. Specificity Hutson WON'T BE Makar. Is that better? That is my point. Has absolutely nothing to do with Homerism. It has to do with how they score, what they do, special moments. True, I have not seen as many of Hutson's games as Michkov's but I've seen enough to see the special moments.Your comments are illogical and are ignorant of basic fact. There is more evidence now that Hutson will be in the top tier of his position than there is for Michkov. Hutson offensively is already in the top tier of his position offensively. You're also conflating situations such as saying that currently Hutson is not Makar or Hughes and then when it comes to Michkov, it will be who he will be as good as in the future. Which is simply conjecture. You have a disease called homerism. It remains to be seen how each player ultimately long term develops. However you have no basis in fact to state that Hutson has not shown himself to be special while Michkov has. As if as a rookie being 2nd overall in your position in assists and in the top 4 in overall scoring in your position in the entire league, not just rookies, isn't a sign of being special.
It remains to be seen if Hutson is a rookie flash in the pan or if he will sustain it. Wouldn't be the first D man to have a flashy first year and then struggle in his second as he tries to learn to actually play good D. That's why I made the Ghost comparison. He could turn out to be really good but he could also end up inconsistent and defensively questionable.
I guarantee you that Michkov will be a perennial all star and ten years from now he will have many more appearances than Hutson and more scoring stats too. I will bet my falling stock portfolio on it (probably worth nothing by the end of this presidency anyway so I can't lose)