Speculation: Fire Glen Sather

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
If the draft pick or prospect goes bad or is traded than its given to Slats but if a 7th round pick makes it big years later than its somebody else.

Calm down, they're only talking about the 2000 draft, and how much input Sather may or may not have had. This is not a referendum on Sather's entire draft history.
 
Sather did inherit a major mess in 2000.

His mistake, and possibly the biggest one he made here, was running the team the exact same way that led them to that mess.
 
Even so, it's common knowledge Sather did not draft Lundqvist, so Sather did inherit something to build around. A future hall of famer.

Right, a future hall of famer. To say Sather had something to build around in Lundqvist from the start is just hindsight speaking. When he was drafted, he wasn't the Lundqvist he is today, and he wasn't the Lundqvist he was almost 10 years ago when he came into the league. He was a 7th round goalie who might be able to fight for a spot to backup the other future hall of famer Dan Blackburn.
 
we always talk about 2000 not being Sather's draft, but in a way, wasn't it? He did have a job in the NHL at that time. He did take a job in the same field and presumably took a job with a team in which he felt comfortable operating. He did have an ability to bring in others to run a draft, or whatever the role may be. In the end, I'm guessing he did decide and dictate a drafting strategy (bpa, needs, ets.) and worked hard in the months leading to the draft going over current personnel, what's out there, Rangers' needs, how the prospects are graded, etc. So I assume he did something (and if he didn't, that's on him, but it was his job to work hard and prepare). So wasn't it his draft? I can't blame him for not getting to the playoffs in year one because it's difficult changing around an organization whose farm system had been decimated, who did not have a #1 pick in the 2000 draft and whose product on ice was less than stellar, but the UFAs he signed were his and perhaps the draft, too, should be consider his. Good, bad and indifferent, and perhaps he should be taking his bows for listening to whoever banged the table on Lundqvist (although we know who that was) instead of opting to take Tim Eriksson, who was still available and taken right after him.

I could swear that I've read that Sather wasn't running the draft table that year. But that doesn't necessarily mean he didn't have input.
 
Right, a future hall of famer. To say Sather had something to build around in Lundqvist from the start is just hindsight speaking. When he was drafted, he wasn't the Lundqvist he is today, and he wasn't the Lundqvist he was almost 10 years ago when he came into the league. He was a 7th round goalie who might be able to fight for a spot to backup the other future hall of famer Dan Blackburn.

Totally agree. Was just saying a lot of what success Sather has had here is based on someone who pretty much landed in his lap.
 
Calm down, they're only talking about the 2000 draft, and how much input Sather may or may not have had. This is not a referendum on Sather's entire draft history.

I'm totally calm. Had a nice lunch. Took care of some errands. It does not change my opinion that Slats often gets blame but not credit for things like this.
 
Dolan is not firing Slats so the haters can either get over their hate or go root for Torts in Vancouver..... or wherever.

Too bad you can't "win" this discussion without going over the top. I've been a fan as least as long as you have and can still see the other side of the argument. You can be a fan of this team and still hate Sather.
 
thought I may have read it too, tawnos, but I cannot remember if it was from in here or from the lion's mouth. Also, you'd think a guy who's taking over a taking organization in a big market would be involved. That's my point.
 
I could swear that I've read that Sather wasn't running the draft table that year. But that doesn't necessarily mean he didn't have input.

I think we had a huge thread about this at some point, and with the help of links we came to the conclusion that Sather was 'around' the 2000 draft and may have had input, but did not drive that draft for the Rangers or make the actual selections.
 
Too bad you can't "win" this discussion without going over the top. I've been a fan as least as long as you have and can still see the other side of the argument. You can be a fan of this team and still hate Sather.

That may be true but all kidding aside I fear all your hate of some players and Slats probably takes away from your enjoyment of the team. I used to be you in a away. I could not stand James Patrick after some years and I found myself having mixed emotions when he did well. The only one my "hate" ended up hurting was myself. Keep in mind that holding on to hate is like taking poison and waiting for the other person to die.
 
That may be true but all kidding aside I fear all your hate of some players and Slats probably takes away from your enjoyment of the team. I used to be you in a away. I could not stand James Patrick after some years and I found myself having mixed emotions when he did well. The only one my "hate" ended up hurting was myself. Keep in mind that holding on to hate is like taking poison and waiting for the other person to die.

I have no idea what you are talking about and you have no idea which players I like (or for that matter dislike--although those players are few and far between: just don't bring up the gutless puke, who thankfully retired years ago).

And do you think I spend what little free time I have watching the Rangers only to moan and groan about Sather?

You have no clue, please don't assume this crap about me.

PS: I really liked James Patrick--followed him his whole career--very underrated defenseman.
 
I have no idea what you are talking about and you have no idea which players I like (or for that matter dislike--although those players are few and far between: just don't bring up the gutless puke, who thankfully retired years ago).

And do you think I spend what little free time I have watching the Rangers only to moan and groan about Sather?

You have no clue, please don't assume this crap about me.

PS: I really liked James Patrick--followed him his whole career--very underrated defenseman.

Actually you are right in this case because I confused you with another poster. My bad. Sorry.
 
What difference does it make who personally scouted and lobbied for Lundqvist?

Anybody who knows anything about Sather knows that he is not a passive, nominal GM. He is hands on. No pick is agreed upon until Sather is allowed to do his due diligence, especially the first draft as Rangers President and GM.

Regardless of who was responsible for discovering Lundqvist, there were about 25 other GMs with egg on their face
for missing the chance to draft him.

Sather is the guy who tells the coach who is getting called up and who is scratched.

Sather decided when Girardi, Callahan, Staal, Dubinsky, Hagelin, Stepan and Kreider were ready for the NHL.

Sather has faults and I think it's time for him to step aside but I don't get the bashing.

The Rangers had the 2nd best record in the NHL from late December to seasons end, and they're in the CF.

Time will tell if not having a 1st rounder 3 years in a row will hurt the franchise. I think it will hurt a bit.
 
The Rangers had 2 players on the roster when Smith took over in 89 that were still on the team that won the cup in 1993-94

Inherited such a great team that he kept just 2 of them.

The 1992 team had 10 regulars Smith inherited. That team won the President's Trophy.

There is no way you can remotely equate the 1989-90 Rangers Smith inherited to the 2000-01 Rangers Sather inherited.
 
If not for Jan Gajdosik we'd all be watching some bad baseball hoping for Football season to get here.

I doubt Sather had much input on a 7th round tender he knew nothing about other than a great report put together by a Euro scout Neil Smith hired.
 
If not for Jan Gajdosik we'd all be watching some bad baseball hoping for Football season to get here.

I doubt Sather had much input on a 7th round tender he knew nothing about other than a great report put together by a Euro scout Neil Smith hired.

I doubt Sather had much input into any draft pick, ever. He doesn't even seem to be familiar with the players already in the NHL.

That said I doubt there are any GMs who are familiar with 7th rounders. I would be extremely surprised if Smith or Sather ever saw Hank play in person. He didn't even debut in the SEL until after we drafted him.

The guy who actually discovered Hank playing in a lower level in sweden was probably some scout assistant there to watch someone else.
 
Wasn't it Rockstrom?

Rockstrom typically gets credit. He was likely the one that told Maloney to draft him when they hit the later rounds.

But I doubt he was the first to follow him for the Rangers. Rockstrom reads reports too.

Either way I never bought the "so and so hired the guy who did this so he gets the credit". It's lunacy. Smith hired Maloney. Maloney ran the draft where the Rangers took Lundqvist. Great. Maloney is also the reason we drafted Jessiman. Does Smith get credit for him? How many scouts were left over from Patrick/Esposito years during Smith's first (and only very successful) draft when we took Weight, Zubov and Nemchinov?

There is only one way to do it: if you are sitting in the seat when the player gets taken, you get credit. Smith was fired months before we took Lundqvist. Sather was the GM but due to his involvement in the Oilers draft was not in charge of Rangers draft. So neither of them should get credit.
 
Rockstrom typically gets credit. He was likely the one that told Maloney to draft him when they hit the later rounds.

But I doubt he was the first to follow him for the Rangers. Rockstrom reads reports too.

Either way I never bought the "so and so hired the guy who did this so he gets the credit". It's lunacy. Smith hired Maloney. Maloney ran the draft where the Rangers took Lundqvist. Great. Maloney is also the reason we drafted Jessiman. Does Smith get credit for him? How many scouts were left over from Patrick/Esposito years during Smith's first (and only very successful) draft when we took Weight, Zubov and Nemchinov?

There is only one way to do it: if you are sitting in the seat when the player gets taken, you get credit. Smith was fired months before we took Lundqvist. Sather was the GM but due to his involvement in the Oilers draft was not in charge of Rangers draft. So neither of them should get credit.

It's even easier to justify minimizing the credit for this one particular thing. it was in the 7th round. A guy that deep in the draft isn't predicted to do too much. It's all time luck. For a related example Bill Belichick admitted as much about drafting Tom Brady. There's credit to be had but not too much for sure.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad