It's not just last game. There has been a consistent lack of structure, consistent lack of preparedness and consistent lack of accountability. I firmly believe that when this team is playing well, it's simply because the players are taking over the game and making things happen. They can do that now because of the skill. But that skill level is hard to bring night in and night out due to fatigue etc. So that's when you rely on structure and players being worried about being held accountable. I have been watching DJ for years now and I just don't see that. It really isn't a cop out. I wholeheartedly disagree.
But you are right that it isn't that simple and blaming DJ and replacing him isn't the panacea that people think it will be. The players are on the ice, not DJ. I'm sure he isn't telling them to coast and screw around and not complete their checks. Better hockey minds than mine need to take charge.
I think this could even possibly be a good situation where an experienced coach is brought in to help DJ. Another voice, not just some dinosaur but a real hockey mind to help with the structure and communication on accountability with the players.
Wow.
The skill level is the one thing that is there night after night. You don't lose skill playing the back half of a back to back or on the first game of a road trip.
What's not there consistently is the determination to win. This team is led by young talent that hasn't yet learned the determination to win needs to be present because without it there's 20 guys on the other bench that, although you might have more skill than them, are trying to win also and if there determination is higher in any given game...well, we see what happens
The poster boy for this imo is Chabot. He looks great some nights and other nights it looks like he is playing pond hockey with his buds and smoking a cracker between periods.
Too much skill is actually a problem we are battling. We've got a ton of it in our top 10 players. And when we couple that skill with a determination to win, to adhere to how we should play, we usually get the result we're looking for. And when we don't....we see what happens
I'm neither pro or against DJ (I couldn't judge coaching if it hit me in the face), but couldn't this also be interpreted in favor of him, in that he is able to exploit home ice advantage very well?
Yes it could be. It could be interpreted that he doesn't have the horses to compete without being able to control the matchups. In fact I'd consider that the most logical conclusion looking at DJ's tenure here