Finland: Nation of Domination

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Not really, as you yourself mentioned, we've discussed it in other threads already, those numbers aren't fully reliable due to the different methods each federation counts registered players. E.g. Russia doesn't include juniors under the age of 10 or in some areas players outside the first team and I 'm not sure they count rec players either (Sweden doesn't). Russian posters evaluated that their actual figure of people playing some form of organized hockey to be around 300K.
And how did they came up with that 300K? Kind of ironic to shoot down the official figures for being unreliable but then at the same time think of some guestimation as more reliable number.
 
I think Finland is up for a decline. 2017 might go without a finn in top 10, 2018 without a finn in first round. If it continues for long Finland might start dwindling down when goalie development goes dry and Laine, Barkov, Risto, and Pulju start retiring..
What the actual...? There are already likely top 10 2017 names or at least one and then you're already talking about retirement of current undrafted Laine, Pulju etc. You realize this is 15+ year timespan and if anything, the indication is that quality stays the same for upcoming years or keeps getting better, as it has now gotten better literally every year. It does not mean a new Laine every year, and there are going to less good draft years but overall the standard keeps rising, and lots of future players are going to be late bloomers anyway.

Even if a better year would be there, there won't likely ever be another goalscoring prospect like Laine in our lifetime. Finland just doesn't produce enough legenda like Sweden/Canada for that to happen.
Yes, doesn't produce because it didn't produce in the past. Is this an argument? Things have now changed and proof is infront of your eyes. One could say someone like Granlund or Barkov made it despite of the system but clearly it can not be anymore the case when promising names are appearing left and right.
 
Last edited:
No we're not. Canada's still the favorite.
Even if not the very first favorites, I kinda doubt that next year Finland gets to enjoy a "dark horse" status regardless. After all, between some returning names from this year (if not our brightest stars) and new additions from the gold-winning U18 class, a lot of those names will be recognized, and (finally?) given the respect they deserve.
 
If we take look about ouer U20 teams from 2012 and 2016 next names are notables:

2012 pos. 4th
Aittokallio
Gibson

Määttä
Pokka
Ristolainen
Hakanpää

Armia
Barkov
Donskoi
Granlund
Granlund
Pulkkinen
Salomäki
Hännikäinen

2013 pos 7th
Laurikainen
Korpisalo
Juvonen

Lindbohm
Määttä
Pokka
Ristolainen

Armia
Barkov
Granlund
Hännikäinen
Lehkonen
Salomäki
Teräväinen

2014 gold
Husso
Saros

Honka
Lindell
Pokka
Ristolainen
Vainonen

Lehkonen
Teräväinen

2015 pos 7th
Husso
Kähkönen
Saros

Honka
Lyytinen
Lintuniemi

Aho
Kapanen
Lehkonen
Puljujärvi
Rantanen

2016 pos: gold
Kähkönen
Vehviläinen

Juolevi
Saarijärvi

Aho
Kapanen
Laine
Puljujärvi
Rantanen
Saarela
Lammikko

And this years U18 team:
2016 U18
Luukkonen?

Jokiharju
Niemeläinen
Vaakanainen
Välimäki

Puljujärvi
Tolvanen
Vesalainen

We can see that our 2012 U20-team was very good, especially forwards were good, defence was super talented, but talented guys were two year underages. Coaching wasnt so good so we didnt get medal thought it was very close. On 2013 our teams forwards were also very good, but now the coaching was almost unclassified and position was poor. On 2014 we had good 1st center, good defence and goalies and excellent coaching, results was gold despite that there wasnt depth on forwards. Again last year our coaching wasnt so good and no depth on defence or forward, results were not good. This year goalie were good, we had super-line and also forward depht was good with good first pair defenders and also very good coaching.
Our that years U18 team is widely high talented and names what are mentioned are only top of iceberg and i could make optimistic predict that over half of team will play on NHL.

I was at the 2014 finals, my god was Husso(?) in net so calm and good, and every time Teravainen had the puck, you knew something was going to happen. Imo Sweden had the upper hand, but Dansk in net was so insecure every time the puck was in Swedens zone, he either covered it when he could have played it, or let out a dangerous rebound. That gold was Teravainen-Ristolainen-Husso tangibles all the way.
 
I still think Sweden is the most impressive nation when it comes to producing and developing hockey talent combined with tactical knowledge and coaching. I honestly do.
 
And how did they came up with that 300K? Kind of ironic to shoot down the official figures for being unreliable but then at the same time think of some guestimation as more reliable number.

I think that was a popular estimation among people who know about the actual situation. Until they start keeping proper records, we won't know for certain.
 
I still think Sweden is the most impressive nation when it comes to producing and developing hockey talent combined with tactical knowledge and coaching. I honestly do.

Gotta agree with that. I'm just glad we're closing the gap.
 
And Liga clubs have only finns? Please....

If we are so weak, why did we win Euro Hockey Tour last year and this year?

Nobody told you that euro hockey tour is a not really a meaningful thing at all? I bet Finland has won that **** the most since it was introduced, but nobody would ever bring EHT dominance up as an argument for the nations hockey dominance.

Those are try out teams for world championship hopefuls.

And why even mention clubs when it comes to this topic? That may belong in the discussion about which league is better (and sweden would have a slight edge in my opinion), but not in this discussion.
 
Thing is...Euros ( you too perhaps? ) tend to downplay the World Cup/ old Canada Cups for similar reasons...it's become a never ending pissing contest...

It was a good best on best tournament before. Now it's ruined with these harlem globetrotters teams that they introduced but before it was close to olympics in significance. They just cheapened it into a NHL hockey show, not a genuine international tournament country vs country.

WHC matters more than WJC, better quality of players and better hockey. It's the "best available" for adults, WJC is "best available" for juniors.
 
It was a good best on best tournament before. Now it's ruined with these harlem globetrotters teams that they introduced but before it was close to olympics in significance. They just cheapened it into a NHL hockey show, not a genuine international tournament country vs country.

WHC matters more than WJC, better quality of players and better hockey. It's the "best available" for adults, WJC is "best available" for juniors.

But a bigger portion of best players from U20s are coming to WJC. Only high end NHL ready prospects dont come which is like 5 players from the whole tournament all together per year. I am very excited about this years tournament though as Finland has almost all of their best forwards coming!

I wouldn't be surprised if USAs U20 team could beat that roster they are going to ice in WHC.
 
Me too.

I like how our young guns have developed, but Sweden has been seriously impressive.

What I find most impressive about the Swedes is the development of their Dmen. In my view, the Swedish D will keep them ahead of the Finns in best on best for the next several years.

Karlsson, OEL, Hedman, Lindholm, Klingberg, and Hjalmarsson holding it down as the defensive Dman of the group, sets Sweden apart.

Swedens generation of defenseman is an elite group, probably 1a & 1b with Canada for the best Dmen group in the world.
 
I still think Sweden is the most impressive nation when it comes to producing and developing hockey talent combined with tactical knowledge and coaching. I honestly do.

Definitely, I live in Sweden and it's really well organised here. A good style of a lot of coaching mixed with not killing too much of the creativity in players (which helped us develop good offensive forwards here).

I would say a part of Finlands recent success is the country had a lot of ridicolously naturally talented prospects who were just bound to succeed especially now that Finland got more patient with developing the bigger prospects rather than small speedy ones.

Finnish development on lower levels feels more layman to me, Sweden is very organised.
 
Finnish development on lower levels feels more layman to me, Sweden is very organised.
There's certainly plenty of organization and guidelines here in Finland as well, believe me on that.

However, how strictly they actually watch those methods being implemented is whole another thing. An individual coach certainly has quite a bit of leeway in that regard.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad