kelsier
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2013
- 4,280
- 1,741
Seems as if you have a broken crystal ball stashed up somewhere. You always make definite statements in regards to who's too young to get in and what not. Like seriously? Then when you get it wrong (lets say for instance Räty makes the team) that's yet another piece gone from the credibility. Is it so hard to add in "in my opinion", that would at least leave you a window open when things went "sideways". Though I think I'm beyond the point of taking these comments anywhere close to serious after seeing that latest reply of "where's Lundell" from the "Huck's top 10: Not yet drafted prospects", that covers all the prospects from all of the future age classes (as if he should be anywhere close up with the best of them). Almost brought it up there but then thought what's the point. A short while later someone else did instead as was expected.
Oh and for the record I absolutely think at least Räty will make the U20 team, similarly to Lundell last year, where the former is much better prospect at the same age. Lambert displayed some magic in the Hlinka and if they fixed the box scores / player stats, he finished up with PPG I think. Even he has a small chance to make the team, it'll just require HIFK (FEL team) to use him from the get go. Not granted, but not out of the realms of possible scenarios either.
Ps. wasn't your previous nick TheFinnishHockeyFan (or something)? The writing style as well as how you construct/composure of these statements are almost exact the same.
