GDT: FIN vs. AUT May 16, 2024

[swissdude]

I'm just able to finally tune in, and I must say, these AJ adverts on the refs are really brutal on the eyes.

that's the least of the problems i have with the refs

 

[Artorius Horus T]

Kapanen has scored 43% of our goals...

 

[tobu]

Why would you challenge that? It was obviously the right call

I'm confused on how this rule works. The current rulebook says this:


69.1. INTERFERENCE ON THE GOALKEEPER This rule is based on the premise that an attacking Player’s position, whether inside or outside the Goal Crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking Players are standing in the Goal Crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if:
I) an attacking Player, either by their positioning or by a "relevant contact”, impairs the Goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within their Goal Crease or defend their goal; or
(II) an attacking Player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a Goalkeeper, inside or outside of their Goal Crease.

Maybe I missed the entire replay, but has the attacking player impaired the goalie? I did not see a contact.

 

[FinPanda]

We suck. Austria is playing very well too and I wouldn't be surprised if they tie it.

 

[OKR]

Pretty soft goalie interference, yeah his skate was in the crease, but it didn’t impair Säteri one bit.

 

[tobu]

Pretty soft goalie interference, yeah his skate was in the crease, but it didn’t impair Säteri one bit.

I agree, if we go by the current rulebook, not by rules years ago, this goal should have counted.

 

[stv11]

I'm confused on how this rule works. The current rulebook says this:


69.1. INTERFERENCE ON THE GOALKEEPER This rule is based on the premise that an attacking Player’s position, whether inside or outside the Goal Crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking Players are standing in the Goal Crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if:
I) an attacking Player, either by their positioning or by a "relevant contact”, impairs the Goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within their Goal Crease or defend their goal; or
(II) an attacking Player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a Goalkeeper, inside or outside of their Goal Crease.

Maybe I missed the entire replay, but has the attacking player impaired the goalie? I did not see a contact.

That's the key bit here, the goalie couldn't move forward to cut the shooting angle. Whoever made the call to challenge has to know that.

 

[jj cale]

Austrians doing it again, good show boys.

 

[Summer Rose]

Go Austria!

 

[FinPanda]

Austria is definitely talented on the offensive zone,, little problems in their own zone.

 

[trust no one]

Baumgartner looks like Makar with MacKinnon's nose....

 

[swissdude]

go rot-weiss-rot now make sure you reward yourselves and get the 3 points

 

[Old Man Jags]

Very, very impressive by Austria! Wow.

 

[tobu]

That's the key bit here, the goalie couldn't move forward to cut the shooting angle. Whoever made the call to challenge has to know that.

Alright , I may understsand that angle, but even in this case this was borderline debatable. The goalie didn't seem to have tried moving forward, I saw just side to side movements, otherwise he'd have contact with the attacking player. Anyway, it is what it is, this rule has been called inconsistently this tournament and that's why we see teams challenging it, so I am not even surprised. Just look at the German goal that stood in game vs Slovakia

 

[OKR]

That's the key bit here, the goalie couldn't move forward to cut the shooting angle. Whoever made the call to challenge has to know that.

”goals scored while attacking Players are standing in the Goal Crease may, in
appropriate circumstances be allowed”

Säteri never even made a attempt to move forward, despite there being space between him and Austria player. Thus i don’t see how his movement was impaired in anyway.

If we go with your definition of impairing, goals with player in the crease should all be waved off automatically.

 

[Svedu]

Scandalous reffing. Good goal Kapanen.

Austria will now win. Deserved perhaps but that call was nothing but BS and you know that.

 

[jj cale]

Effective p.k

 

[NyQuil]

Austria gotta Austria.

 

[Svedu]

F*CK THIS FINNISH SHIT ROSTER. CONGRATS AUSTRIA. WELL DESERVED.

 

[SwissFan12]

OMG

 

[Summer Rose]

Holy heck. Hope that counts.

 

[Jussi]

Oh ffs...

 

[Albatros]

Good goal.

 

[swissdude]

the guy on austrian tv is going nuts lol, well deseverd neighbours

 

[jj cale]

Holy shit!!!!!