Twisted Sinister
Living in Your Head Rent Free
- Oct 8, 2014
- 2,072
- 3,143
Then why did every other NHL team also pick “lesser players” (passing on Hutson, many multiple times)?I'm definitely not asking the habs to bat 1000, only saying that Mesar was a bad pick at the Time and hindsight's got nothing to do with it. He simply didn't have an argument to go ahead of a number of players.
That we picked Hutson is, of course, awesome. But the team should ask themselves why they passed on Hutson for clearly lesser players.
Then why did every other NHL team also pick “lesser players” (passing on Hutson, many multiple times)?
#1 - NHL wide belief Hutson’s size would relegate him to a PP specialist, therefore not a regular 20TOI+ top-4D.Probably for similar reasons we did.
Why did we rank Mesar of all players ahead of Hutson? I didn't. What was the argument?
Why do we write every player off immediately?
Literally the only player in laval that has the talent to jump into a top 6 role next year
Now that Dach is out the habs will do well to give him a shot.
May I know why we shouldn't have drafted Kulich ? Ya, I remember that a lot of us here wanted Kulich back then. My mind was on Hutson. At that time, I was upset that we didn't take Hutson in the first and early 2nd round.Good thing they didn't draft Kulich like everyone was screaming at them to do...
#1 - NHL wide belief Hutson’s size would relegate him to a PP specialist, therefore not a regular 20TOI+ top-4D.
Hutson was ranked 40OA on Bobby Mac’s final list, which has been the gold standard for decades now, as it’s a survey of scouts, Slaf 1OA, Mesar 30OA (went 26OA), Beck 33OA (exact spot he was selected)
Right, size. It's not clear to me what Mesar was ever going to do in the NHL, and he's also small.
There are at LEAST half a dozen forwards I'd give NHL time to before Mesar. Dude should be be in the ECHL.Literally the only player in laval that has the talent to jump into a top 6 role next year
Now that Dach is out the habs will do well to give him a shot.
There are at LEAST half a dozen forwards I'd give NHL time to before Mesar. Dude should be be in the ECHL.
Easy. Barre-Boulet, Dauphin, Roy, Davidson, Farrell, Xhekaj. Mesar and his 1 point over his last 11 games shouldn't see another minute of AHL time. Dude is a total bust. He hasn't shown anything to deserve AHL top 6 minutes, never mind NHL top 6.Give me 1 guy
Easy. Barre-Boulet, Dauphin, Roy, Davidson, Farrell, Xhekaj. Mesar and his 1 point over his last 11 games shouldn't see another minute of AHL time. Dude is a total bust. He hasn't shown anything to deserve AHL top 6 minutes, never mind NHL top 6.
Farrell, if he plays like he is currently, and Xhekaj if he keeps improving are ahead of Mesar. That could change if Mesar can stay healthy and put up some points. And, yes, next up should be Roy and Davidson.What's the purpose of trolling like this?
Barre-Boulet is a 27 year old professional AHLer. At Mesar's age was an overeager in the Q. He gets his points by being on the top lines and PP units. Similarly with Dauphin.
They deserve brief call ups in the sense that it may be a good managerial move to occasionally reward AHL vets with brief call ups. There's an argument for that, sure.
I do think that Roy and Davidson are the most likely and most reasonable call ups.