Kerfoot is weak,costs to much for a third line center and costs you the puck on a defensive zone faceoff is not ridiculous. Its fact. Who cares about a adv stat when i say fact like that. I’m not being ridiculous saying that. The person pushingbthe crap stat is wrong, but they keep harping on. Thats annoying and thats what causes disinterest
It was a example thats true. Did i say you said it. You just didn’t like it because it’s true likely. This is a hockey site dude. It's not court. Yer out to lunch. Go shake yer pillow
You thinking something for no apparent reason does not make something a fact.
The stats themselves are results and facts. How we interpret them is where you may see bias. For example, tyson barrie is in the 79th percentile in controlled exits. If someone says that he oftenly leaves the zone with the puck on his stick (or passes it to a teammate who is able to get past the center line), That is an unbiased fact.
It’s probably based on a decades worth of raw data of where people score, but even a one inch deviation does make a difference. If a shooter is one inch left of the high danger zone, it’s harder for the shooter to score as the goalie can block off angles.
When a human is compiling the data it’s always going to be prone to error, bias.
He is to costly for third line center,softbon the puck,weak when he gets there and loses many more faceoffs than he wins. He was not good. Now all the talk is he is goung to kill penalties haaa. He will lose most defensive zone draws. Oh yeah he’s awesome
You should write this statement 1000 times every day and read it atleast once yourself there Son
Except the positions I take are backed up by actual facts. Your substantiation just seems to be that you think it.
I read his faceoff stats dude. They are crap. 46% Are you pretending now you never seen them before. Not much of a stats guy after all are you. He’s junk on the dots. Thats a fact.
First off, you claimed more than just about his face-offs, and you substantiated none of it. Second, he was about 47% on faceoffs last year, but was actually 56% the year before, putting him at almost 52% over the last 2 years. So no, he is not "junk on the dots". The more likely answer is that wearing a full facemask probably impacts faceoffs. Third, faceoffs aren't really the most relevant or impactful stat. All faceoffs do is determine initial possession, but possession is constantly changing; it's much more important what you do after the faceoff. A 47% faceoff percentage means that Kerfoot lost one extra faceoff every 3 or so games... It has very little relevance to his overall quality and impact as a player, and it's not a reason to get rid of somebody. Especially when we now have one of the best face-off players of the last generation as an assistant coach, to help teach that aspect of play.
48.4 career on faceoffs. If you think thats good. I proved enough for whoever reads that. Exposes you somewhat I’d say. He is a third line center making $3,500,000 and thats another thing i said that you are contesting. He’s as good as gone as soon as he can be moved. He is weak and knocked off pucks easy i also said. You contest that too d ya. Oh sweet. Yeah he’s a real ox out there. Starting with the puck is key. Starting with the puck in the defensive zone is paramount. This guy supposedly killing penalties next season and losing more than he wins in the defensive zone faceoffs isn’t important to you either. Ohhhh yeah very interesting. You just corner yourself every letter you hit.
| Season | Age | Team | Lg | GP | G | A | PTS | S | BA | MISS | TSA | SThr% | FOW | FOL | FO% | HIT | BLK | TK | GV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | 23 | COL | NHL | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 63.6 | 26 | 29 | 47.3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 2018-19 | 24 | COL | NHL | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 9 | 10 | 36 | 47.2 | 14 | 16 | 46.7 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| 2019-20 | 25 | TOR | NHL | 5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 55.6 | 15 | 31 | 32.6 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 4 |
| 82 Game Avg. | NHL | 82 | 7 | 21 | 29 | 103 | 50 | 46 | 200 | 51.8 | 196 | 271 | 42.0 | 71 | 64 | 21 | 50 | ||
| 2 yrs | COL | NHL | 18 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 12 | 11 | 47 | 51.1 | 40 | 45 | 47.1 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 10 | |
| Career | NHL | 23 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 29 | 14 | 13 | 56 | 51.8 | 55 | 76 | 42.0 | 20 | 18 | 6 | 14 |
48.4 career on faceoffs. If you think thats good. I proved enough for whoever reads that. Exposes you somewhat I’d say. He is a third line center making $3,500,000 and thats another thing i said that you are contesting. He’s as good as gone as soon as he can be moved. He is weak and knocked off pucks easy i also said. You contest that too d ya. Oh sweet. Yeah he’s a real ox out there. Starting with the puck is key. Starting with the puck in the defensive zone is paramount. This guy supposedly killing penalties next season and losing more than he wins in the defensive zone faceoffs isn’t important to you either. Ohhhh yeah very interesting. You just corner yourself every letter you hit.
His three season zone starts % is 59 in the offensive zone and 41 in the defensive zone. The man is very sheltered defensively and thats a a $3,500,000 3rd line center you think is squate money for that role. Anyways there is so much more negative but you wouldn’t want to understand. I don’t have time to teach you either.
NHL Playoffs Extra Stats (All)
He won 32% faceoffs in playoffs wow eh
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Season Age Team Lg GP G A PTS S BA MISS TSA SThr% FOW FOL FO% HIT BLK TK GV 2017-18 23 COL NHL 6 2 0 2 7 3 1 11 63.6 26 29 47.3 2 2 1 2 2018-19 24 COL NHL 12 0 3 3 17 9 10 36 47.2 14 16 46.7 10 6 4 8 2019-20 25 TOR NHL 5 0 3 3 5 2 2 9 55.6 15 31 32.6 8 10 1 4 82 Game Avg. NHL 82 7 21 29 103 50 46 200 51.8 196 271 42.0 71 64 21 50 2 yrs COL NHL 18 2 3 5 24 12 11 47 51.1 40 45 47.1 12 8 5 10 Career NHL 23 2 6 8 29 14 13 56 51.8 55 76 42.0 20 18 6 14
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TFOOT] [/TFOOT]
How about the fact Dubas seemed to change his approach with the signings of Thornton, Bogosian, Simmonds, and Brodie. When you look at their height it goes against the theory he only wants small and fast players.
