Ten spots higher than that. The number of players his age to score 50 goals is very small.
people were saying the same thing about Eeli Tolvanen before his D+1 season ended. Luckily pro scouts aren’t that volatile.
Ten spots higher than that. The number of players his age to score 50 goals is very small.
I can't speak to the 2019 draft class specifically but here's the factual data we have so far:
He's on track to finish with the best GPG rate in decades among U19 players in the OHL. Also on pace to actually hit 60 goals despite missing 16 games. As others have mentioned he's doing this through elite finish AND insane shot generation/volume.
Assuming that kind of "elite finishing talent + elite shot generation" likely translates to 30+ goals consistently in the NHL...then that probably makes him a Top 5-10 pick in most drafts.
people were saying the same thing about Eeli Tolvanen before his D+1 season ended. Luckily pro scouts aren’t that volatile.
As mentioned previous, this kid was 4 days away from being in the 2020 draft. What he is doing is pretty impressive. He most definitely would be a top 10 pick in a redraft. Had he been born 4 days later he would be a top 10 pick in this draft if this was his draft year, and it is a much stronger draft than 2019.
to be fair it is a little weird how often you seem to get obsessed with homer comments from a handful of Leaf fans.So to you people who say he is “definitely” a top 10 pick, who are all the players you’re removing for him to be in there?
As already pointed out, to non-Leaf fans players like Hughes/Dach/Kakko/Seider/Byram/Cozens/Turcotte/Poulin/Pelletier/Kaliyev/McMicheal/Heinola/Bjornfoot/Newhook/Zegras/Caulfied are obviously ahead of him (not to mention many others with very strong arguments)
So which of them has he now easily surpassed?
I know I’ll get plenty of “LOL Leaf hater” comments from leaf fans because apparently saying a prospect “only” jumps from the 50s to the 20s, but this is the same as others freaking out over Tolvanen. Great prospect having a great season, but some are getting carried away
people were saying the same thing about Eeli Tolvanen before his D+1 season ended. Luckily pro scouts aren’t that volatile.
to be fair it is a little weird how often you seem to get obsessed with homer comments from a handful of Leaf fans.
So to you people who say he is “definitely” a top 10 pick, who are all the players you’re removing for him to be in there?
As already pointed out, to non-Leaf fans players like Hughes/Dach/Kakko/Seider/Byram/Cozens/Turcotte/Poulin/Pelletier/Kaliyev/McMicheal/Heinola/Bjornfoot/Newhook/Zegras/Caulfied are obviously ahead of him (not to mention many others with very strong arguments)
So which of them has he now easily surpassed?
I know I’ll get plenty of “LOL Leaf hater” comments from leaf fans because apparently saying a prospect “only” jumps from the 50s to the 20s, but this is the same as others freaking out over Tolvanen. Great prospect having a great season, but some are getting carried away
So to you people who say he is “definitely” a top 10 pick, who are all the players you’re removing for him to be in there?
As already pointed out, to non-Leaf fans players like Hughes/Dach/Kakko/Seider/Byram/Cozens/Turcotte/Poulin/Pelletier/Kaliyev/McMicheal/Heinola/Bjornfoot/Newhook/Zegras/Caulfied are obviously ahead of him (not to mention many others with very strong arguments)
So which of them has he now easily surpassed?
I know I’ll get plenty of “LOL Leaf hater” comments from leaf fans because apparently saying a prospect “only” jumps from the 50s to the 20s, but this is the same as others freaking out over Tolvanen. Great prospect having a great season, but some are getting carried away
I personally dont think he would be top 10 in a redraft but a lot of those players are not "obviously ahead of him"
He's having a similar season offensively to most of those guys on your list and he has no glaring weaknesses other than size. If he was drafted in the early 20s, calling him a top 10 in a redraft wouldnt be much of a reach but there is some issues with it based mostly on pedigree.
For example, why is Pelletier "Obviously better"? He is the same size, has fewer points in 10 more games, isnt leading his league in goals, and isnt even leading his team in scoring.
And, Q scoring is less transferable to NHL scoring according to pretty much all studies I've seen on how scoring translates, and Robertson is 6 months younger, which isn't huge but is sizable for a non-elite top of the draft players.I personally dont think he would be top 10 in a redraft but a lot of those players are not "obviously ahead of him"
He's having a similar season offensively to most of those guys on your list and he has no glaring weaknesses other than size. If he was drafted in the early 20s, calling him a top 10 in a redraft wouldnt be much of a reach but there is some issues with it based mostly on pedigree.
For example, why is Pelletier "Obviously better"? He is the same size, has fewer points in 10 more games, isnt leading his league in goals, and isnt even leading his team in scoring.
Where id disagree with this, is re-drafts usually look at what a player has done since being drafted, not just pedigree.When you include the past seasons for these players as well it would be very hard to put him ahead of guys having similar offensive seasons this year.
Where id disagree with this, is re-drafts usually look at what a player has done since being drafted, not just pedigree.
I cant honestly say I know much about most of the guys people are spouting off as the top 15/20. Im a OHL season ticket holder so ive seen a fair bit of those guys on the list over the last few years, which I think is more than most people on these boards.
I doubt anyone on these boards has any real understanding of how these guys are doing in their respective leagues, how they look outside of the stats categories, etc. No one can honestly say they know how an 18 y.o kid in a European B league playing 10 mins a night on a 3rd pair compares to a kid in another league ripping it up. People who do it for a living have a hard time.
Saying all of this, as a Leaf fan im pumped to have him. Goal scoring, speed, some swagger and a fair bit of grit are all good.
Should he be a top # pic, who cares!
As already pointed out, to non-Leaf fans players like Hughes/Dach/Kakko/Seider/Byram/Cozens/Turcotte/Poulin/Pelletier/Kaliyev/McMicheal/Heinola/Bjornfoot/Newhook/Zegras/Caulfied are obviously ahead of him (not to mention many others with very strong arguments)
That’s really over-doing it.
Think of it critically for a second:
There’s a 0% chances he’s being picked before Hughes/Dach/Kakko. Full time NHLers who have massive upside.
Byram and Seider are also obvious no-go’s
So top 5 is obviously out of the question.
Tomasimo, Cozens, Poulin, McMichael, Pelletier and Kaliyev are putting up similar PPG while all having higher pedigree and much better previous seasons.
Then you have players with NHL experience where they did very well in Heinola/Bjornfoot.
Add in the other early picks that are hard to compare like the NCAA guys/Europeans
There’s really 0% chance GMs are as reactionary as fans and would all of a sudden view him as a top 5 to 10 player after a D+1 when he’s still in Junior.
As another has pointed out, posters went nuts when Tolvanen had a big D+1 and claimed he would go top 5 in a re-draft and that obviously would have been an awful choice.
people were saying the same thing about Eeli Tolvanen before his D+1 season ended. Luckily pro scouts aren’t that volatile.
This is an excellent candidate for the Bookmark feature
I enjoyed this:
Toronto may have finally found their "Pastrnak/Kucherov" type steal. A later pick that has 1st line potential.
Should be a very interesting year for him. We've only seen him against his teenaged peers, so we will get a much better feel when we gets some time in against pros.
This is an excellent candidate for the Bookmark feature
Toronto may have finally found their "Pastrnak/Kucherov" type steal. A later pick that has 1st line potential.
I feel like Kucherov/Pastrnak is extremely ambitious. My hope is someone like Joe Pavelski or Jeff Skinner. If he exceeds that then that is exception.
Re-drafts a year out are a waste of time. Robertson looks really good. Far out-reached the expectations of many to this point.
Let's be happy with what he looks like he might be. To suggest he's a 'Kucherov/Pastrnak' is outrageous at this point in time.
With every Leaf fan over-valuing him, there are just as many non-Leafs fans undervaluing him. It's funny to see the same posters in every single thread about a Leafs prospect.
sure - might want to bookmark your own comment as well comparing Robertson to 2 of the top 10 players in the league.