F Michael Misa - Saginaw Spirit, OHL (2025 Draft)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Misa is not a 2C. He projects as a 1C or too winger. Don’t get it confused because you have Celebrini. Misa has all the capability in the world to turn Celebrini into the 2C
Never say never (Misa could explode post-draft to another level) but having watched them both extensively in their draft years (and being a huge fan of Misa), there's just no argument for Misa over Celebrini as prospects, and Mack has exceeded all expectations as an 18 year old #1C in the NHL.

It would be more of a Crosby-Malkin 1A-1B situation at center.
 
Misa is not a 2C. He projects as a 1C or too winger. Don’t get it confused because you have Celebrini. Misa has all the capability in the world to turn Celebrini into the 2C
In my limited viewings, I don’t see Misa supplanting Celebrini as 1C. And as I said above I am not just look at Celebrini, but rather looking at Celebrini as the 1C and Smith as the presumed future 2C. With that, I am not sure there is as much marginal value to adding Misa as there would be adding Schaefer.

In a vacuum I would take Misa over Smith, but again adding a marginally better top 2 C while passing over a potential #1 D just doesn’t seem optimal given the broader construction of the Sharks prospect pool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan
Never say never (Misa could explode post-draft to another level) but having watched them both extensively in their draft years (and being a huge fan of Misa), there's just no argument for Misa over Celebrini as prospects, and Mack has exceeded all expectations as an 18 year old #1C in the NHL.

It would be more of a Crosby-Malkin 1A-1B situation at center.
Well said. That’s where I was going with it. But I’m a bit higher on Misa having watched him extensively. Kid has it all offensively.

If that's the case, he should be the clear 1OA and one of the strongest 1OAs in recent history. Because Macklin was clearly 1OA and is proving to be a strong one so far.

If Sharks are lucky to pick him, he could be an amazing 1W or an elite 2C who would be 1C on many teams, and that's an envious lineup.

I really like Misa at 2 and maybe even pushing for 1, but I'm not sure I see him as that good that he would clearly make Celebrini into the 2C.
All I was saying is that he had the. Capability to do it. Macklin is great, but so is Misa is where I was going with it.
 
Well said. That’s where I was going with it. But I’m a bit higher on Misa having watched him extensively. Kid has it all offensively.


All I was saying is that he had the. Capability to do it. Macklin is great, but so is Misa is where I was going with it.
I mean, you could make the argument that anyone could be better than anyone because technically anything could happen. A meteor could take out 99.99% of the planet and then I might be one of the best 700 hockey players in North American and get to play in the NHL. The odds of Misa becoming better than Celebrini are not that dramatically slim, but the chance he makes Celebrini the 2C in SJ seem pretty small to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan
Misa is just as if not more dynamic than Celebrini, but Celebrini’s game translates better to the pro game. Misa feasts on lower competition and there will be a big learning curve for him to deal with at the NHL level. Not that Misa is unlikely to handle the curve, but he’s not likely to walk-in to the show and become a 30 goal/near PPG player at 18. Schaefer is similarly high end and looks a bit safer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JotAlan
If he was, he'd be a unanimous 1st overall, over a defenseman who has played like 30 games.

And he should be.
Man, Schaeffer is good, but I really see a lot more hype than I should. The guy played 30 games coming off a not-so-good last season. I don't see that Makar/Hughes level talent.
The funny thing is that I feel like Misa's hype didn't explode due to his underwhelming last season, because he's currently on track for the biggest U18 season in the last 30 years. What he's doing is insane and he has it all. Great finisher, great shot, good playmaker, high IQ, great defense, has size, elite skating. I really don't understand. He should be the 1OA consensus these days, imo.
And I say this with a pain in my heart, because I'm a big fan of James Hagens and I believe he has the greatest potential in this draft.
 
Last edited:
The other two were also 1st overall picks. Considering Schaefer has like 15 games played, Misa might end up surpassing him between now and June.
While I would take Schaefer the difference between him and misa is so small and NHL teams are generally pretty conservative could see a few taking Misa at #1.
 
And he should be.
Man, Schaeffer is good, but I really see a lot more hype than I should. The guy played 30 games coming off a not-so-good last season. I don't see that Makar/Hughes level talent.
The funny thing is that I feel like Misa's hype didn't explode due to his underwhelming last season, because he's currently on track for the biggest U18 season in the last 30 years. What he's doing is insane and he has it all. Great finisher, great shot, good playmaker, high IQ, great defense, has size, elite skating. I really don't understand. He should be the 1OA consensus these days, imo.
And I say this with a pain in my heart, because I'm a big fan of James Hagens and I believe he has the greatest potential in this draft.
I think we all agree it depends who ends up with the 1st pick. While Schaefer might be a risky pick, some of these teams might take the chance on him, considering they don't know if they'll get the chance to grab a defenseman with his potential at the top of a draft again.

You can't really use the mindset "we'll just draft a defenseman first next year"...because who knows what can happen in 12 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wetcoast
Exactly how I think. There's a desperation for Schaeffer, and okay, he's good. But he didn't play more than half the season, I would light a yellow flag and the hype for me is overrated. Plus, there's a great D vintage on the horizon with 2026 Verhoef, Rudolph, 2027 Dupont. I would choose Misa, I wouldn't look back and I would spend everything on bringing good D.
Celebrini-Misa wow, +Smith this is pure insanity for the next 10 years.
I don't think that the Sharks will be in the race for dupont in 2027 anyways, no matter who they draft this year.

If they are then a lot of their prospects will have failed miserably.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad