Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Why would he? Doesn’t usually happen for players going to play college hockey, unless there’s a good reason.Any chance he leaves and comes to the WHL?
Why would he? Doesn’t usually happen for players going to play college hockey, unless there’s a good reason.Any chance he leaves and comes to the WHL?
16+33=49 points in 35 games. He’s 3rd in the USHL in points and only two behind the leader. Has a higher PPG than both ahead of him. Very real chance he could lead the league in scoring having missed five games.
Still won’t be picked first two rounds because he’s too short. If he somehow shows up to the combine and measures in at like 5’9.5 instead of 5’7, that might elevate him like two full rounds from third to first. I think that’s the only thing keeping his stock so low.
Don’t you think hockey sense and vision are plus tools? Or you are not counting those as tools?Swanson really doesn't have plus tools. If he did, there would be more intrigue with him. Like a good chess player, his game is built on thinking one or two steps ahead and breaking down a defense. It's all quick plays, finding soft areas, small area stuff. Very good vision and hockey sense. As smart of a player as you'll see. Everything else though is a question mark. He's small. He's not an explosive skater. He's not fast. Doesn't have game breaking skill. Doesn't have a heavy shot.
He won't be a center in the NHL. Simply doesn't have the skillset. He pretty much has to be a 40+ assist type from the wing to make it.
I'm a hockey sense over tools guy, but there has to be some baseline. You can know what to do, but it doesn't matter if you can't create any space for yourself because your neither big enough or a good enough skater.
Edit - Tools, I'm more talking size and individual skillset. How well you skate, how you shoot the puck, etc.Don’t you think hockey sense and vision are plus tools? Or you are not counting those as tools?
These are both not the same. Poirier has some legit power in his game. He's thick. I think Swanson has a much harder time making the league. Think TJ Tynan. Poirier is more like debrincat. One of the top dogs in his draft yr in a top 3 CHL team.Mac Swanson and Justin Poirier are two intriguing guys like that for this draft.. skill level and tools wise they will be picked behind a lot of guys they shouldn't be because of how small they are.
When was he last measured?Still won’t be picked first two rounds because he’s too short. If he somehow shows up to the combine and measures in at like 5’9.5 instead of 5’7, that might elevate him like two full rounds from third to first. I think that’s the only thing keeping his stock so low.
He’s a complete surgeon out there on the ice. He’s always aware of where everyone is on the ice, and if you leave one of his teammates slightly open in the offensive zone he’ll find them. For a 5’7 player, he’s not afraid of going to the net, but has obvious limitations. Not afraid to shoot it. His playmaking is better, but he’s not only a perimeter playmaker. I think he skates pretty well. He’s not high effort. He’s more methodical, so he slows the game down, and plays a lot of east to west hockey. It can look like he’s playing slow, but I find when he really needs to play fast he has solid speed. He’s about average defensively for a smaller forward. He’s played some center, but I think he profiles a lot better on the wing. The hockey sense and playmaking is elite, as is the pure scoring totals. With the right coach that trusts in him, you’ll get a top six winger. But if he finds himself in the wrong situation, he might never get the chance due to his size. I don’t see that much of a difference between the risk associated with him and someone like Caufield (who went mid-first round), so I think any later than early second you’re getting a steal.