He wouldnt be the compliment he hits his ceiling and he is the best player on that team and organization. I think some people are severely underplaying Slafkovskys skill set. His physical attributes along with his motor and puck skills are extremely rare. There is no doubt he has the highest ceiling in the draft. If someone has scouted him alot and is confident in his on going progression I dont see anyone passing on him.
I don't know the future.
His hype is heavily dependent on the Olympic tournament. Except that if he does not repeat the world championship, people will see him less strong.
He has made great progress this year. Usually Nemec was always better than him. At HG, his talent was eclipsed by another player, a year younger.
I have no doubt that Slafkovsky can go 89-90 on the scale of an NHL game.
The level of elite talents is often very close. Who is better between Eichel, Rantanen, Aho, Marner or Kaprizov? It does not matter. The real difference is made on the contract signed after 3 years of experience and on the complementarity compared to the other players.
I have no doubt that Slafkovsky will do just fine for New Jersey. But Montreal is first looking for a top 6 center to support Suzuki. NJ already has those players there.
After if Wright is going to make Hischier's career... I don't know. People say that in relation to the point average. The NHL reality will be something else. Montreal fans are hoping for a complete center.
If it was written that Slafkovsky will be Rantanen and Wright will be Hischier it would be known. Drafting is not an exact science.
There will most likely be a group of players of a very close level.
Projections are bullshit. Each player is cited as an example (Rantanen, Aho, Kaprizov, Bergeron, O'Reilly, Hischier) whereas if the evolution of these players had been determined in the year of their draft, they would have been selected at a different rank.